Source:
TIMEAs if President Bush and Alberto Gonzales didn't have enough trouble dealing with the continuing attorney firings controversy, a whole new front has opened up in the emerging battle between Congress and the Justice Department over executive branch authority.
Thursday evening Henry Waxman, the California Democrat who chairs the House Government Oversight committee, sent the Attorney General a letter asking for all kinds of records concerning the Bush Administration's handling of a recent federal case against the tobacco industry. The letter followed a Thursday morning front-page story in the Washington Post, which claimed top political appointees in the Justice Department had pressured the lead prosecutor in a recent federal case claiming the tobacco industry had conspired to lie to U.S. smokers, forcing her to ease off on cigarette-making executives and their companies. The prosecutor, Sharon Eubanks, said the interference had undermined her ability to "zealously represent the interests of the American public." (The U.S. District judge ruled against the companies, but rejected the monetary penalties requested by the government, and the case is currently being appealed.)
After a proper enough start to the letter — "Dear Mr. Attorney General, The Oversight Committee requests information..."— Waxman got down to brass tacks, demanding: "All communications between the White House and the Department of Justice related to the Department's suit against the tobacco industry; All notes, in any form, kept by political appointees at the Department related to White House involvement in the tobacco litigation; An accounting of all contacts between the White House and the Department of Justice related to the tobacco litigation..." And so on. The White House has not yet responded to Waxman's request, and has had no comment on the charges of interference detailed in the Post story.
Waxman has a long history criticizing the tobacco industry. He ran the 1994 hearings where top cigarette makers serially denied any knowledge that smoking could be addictive or cause disease. He then organized further hearings that proved some of their companies had suppressed research showing both things. He has sponsored numerous bills regulating tobacco use. And he has issued several letters voicing concern about the case Eubanks was prosecuting.
Read more:
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1602410,00.html