Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOJ Official Ignored White House Guidance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:37 AM
Original message
DOJ Official Ignored White House Guidance
Source: ABC News

Testimony Contradicted Gonzales in U.S. Attorney Matter, Sparked Controversy
Related Stories

March 26, 2007 — The firestorm over the fired U.S. attorneys was sparked last month when a top Justice Department official ignored guidance from the White House and rejected advice from senior administration lawyers over his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The official, Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty, ignored White House Counsel Harriet Miers and senior lawyers in the Justice Department when he told the committee last month of specific reasons why the administration fired seven U.S. attorneys — and appeared to acknowledge for the first time that politics was behind one dismissal. McNulty's testimony directly conflicted with the approach Miers advised, according to an unreleased internal White House e-mail described to ABC News. According to that e-mail, sources said, Miers said the administration should take the firm position that it would not comment on personnel issues.

Until McNulty's testimony, administration officials had consistently refused to publicly say why specific attorneys were dismissed and insisted that the White House had complete authority to replace them. That was Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' approach when he testified before the committee in January.

But McNulty, who worked on Capitol Hill 12 years, believed he had little choice but to more fully discuss the circumstances of the attorneys' firings, according to a a senior Justice Department official familiar the circumstances. McNulty believed the senators would demand additional information, and he was confident he could draw on a long relationship with New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, in explaining in more detail, sources told ABC News.


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2983066&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Did she counsel him to lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Lie" is such an ugly word. She was just guiding the witness so as to make sure the
answers were worded in such a way as to answer the question without volunteering any information that wasn't asked that might only serve to generate additional difficult questions. I am sure that is what Harriet was doing and nothing more.:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Why is the white house counsel participating in ANYTHING to do with the Justice Dept?
She's the personal lawyer to the president, not a member of the justice department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-27-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. 'guidance'!!!! what a nice word for 'lie your ass off'
sounds to me like mcnulty has some integrity or at least was aware enough to know that HAD he gone up there and lied and then been caught at it cheney and pals would have happily tossed him to the wolves. that said, cheney and pals are trying to demonize him now, but its empty posturing gladly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC