Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Outrage at India menstrual form

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:44 AM
Original message
Outrage at India menstrual form
Source: BBC

Women civil servants in India have expressed shock at new appraisal rules which require them to reveal details of their menstrual cycles.

Under the new nationwide requirements, female officials also have to say when they last sought maternity leave.

Women civil servants say the questions are a gross invasion of privacy. One told the BBC she was "gobsmacked".

Annual appraisals and health checks are mandatory in India's civil service. The ministry was unavailable for comment.

Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/6545115.stm



I can see this could be a question that a doctor would ask in a general health check. But for it to be something on an official form that is recorded, and presumably available to some other employees, does seem an incredible intrusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Another invasion by male pigs
Probably so they can "properly" schedule their trysts while on the job....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. From the Aggie Sex Test
A menstrual cycle has three wheels (T/F). The people who thought this up must have passed that test.

What would be the point of such a thing when (as I understand it) many women are irregular?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. It is and it smacks of prurience on the part of some male boss
This is the kind of thing that should be discussed with an OB-Gyn during a visit. If it's abnormal, s/he makes a note of it in the patient's chart along with the treatment, if any.

It also sounds like they're trying to determine which women are going to become pregnant so they can fire them now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Realtors and employers in this country used to be allowed to ask women all sorts...
of private questions.

It wasn't that long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Indian women better fight back and keep their govt. out of their bodies


give the men an inch and they will move into your womb and begin telling you what you can and cannot do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarenS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. well,,,, back in the bad old days,,,,, 1969
Part of the application form for a large company asked ~ 1. are you pregnant? 2. date of your last menstrual cycle. I was only 18 then and hugely embarrassed that I needed to answer these questions. It was indeed an intrusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Companies trying to avoid maternity leaves?
I'm guessing so.
Welcome to the world of free-trade, where the CEO's compensation package is job 1.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gen. Jack D. Ripper Donating Member (547 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. This is what I never got about capitalism
or, at least objectivism. The whole Ayn Rand, Laissez-faire mentality. Isn't it supposed to be individualism? In the modern American iteration it seems to be individualism for a very select few, the rest of us subjugated to roles of subservience so the fore mentioned few can test the limits of self satisfaction and indulgence.

Those "Free Capitalists," who spout on about how wonderful it is to live in a land where anyone can achieve prosperity if they only work hard enough, are so full of shit they should have it beaten out of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yep. One tenth (1/10th) of the American people have the
right to privacy and property and whatever else goes along with the 'myth' of being an American citizen. The rest of us just have the right (and it's mandatory) to pay for that upper 10% 'rights'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Capitalism is a Ponzi scheme it benefits only the top of the pyramid
the majority are crushed by the weight of supporting everything on top.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otherlander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. They broke their backs lifting Moloch to heaven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. It's what laissez fair capitalism has in common
with Marxism. In theory, a good idea, in practice, impossible.

They both fail to account for human nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. The correct answer to that question would be "MYOB" ... Using the
telephone key pad, the date would be 6-9-62...let them figure it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Rhythm Employment Method
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is not so strange.
In India, women are asked to not enter temples, when they are on their cycle. They are considered to be unclean at that time.

Also Yoga centers throughout India, will not allow women to do yoga exercises during that time of the month.

This is not new, but the concept of asking at the work place seems new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That is all outrageous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. you totally lose your center of gravity during your menstrual cycle, or
at least I find that I do (during karate exercises and stuff). mebbe that has something to do with the yoga stuff. not sure about the temple thing, tho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Interesting.
I'll try to find out WHY the Temple priests have said this in the past. I never could figure that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Not all of us do. As an adult figure hobby figure skater I still land jumps
and do spins. I don't notice a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. I do yoga 5 x per week - and I don't find that to be the case for me...
...there is little if any diff in my ability to balance when it's that time as opposed to when it isn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. I wonder if they'd get paid time off during their cycle if they are "unclean"? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. I once heard a story...
and I think it took place in India, that an electronics manufacturing plant was noticing that every month their product came off the assembly line completely useless for a few days. As it turned out, all line workers were all women and had synchronized their menstral cycles (I forget what that's called). So apparently the normal hormones involved slightly changed the pH of their skin, which chemically doped the electronics that they handled, making them useless.

Not that that has anything to do with this.

They better have a hell of an excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
22. Do they ask men when was the last time...
...they ejaculated? Why NOT? Or, when the last time was they impregnated someone (that they KNOW of). Why NOT? It's as inappropriate and invasive.

This is just more of a patriarchal, mysogenist society sticking their noses into women's bodies in order to maintain control. I swear male-dominated societies see women's uteruses as puppet strings and straightjackets. Why must they try to imprison women inside a uterus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. the world is so full of a number of things ...
and google can find most of 'em for you.

I was interested in the comments on women and temples in India in this thread.

http://www.chennaionline.com/columns/variety/2006/07sabarimala.asp

... Should we be bothered when we see, even in the 21st century, a woman being prohibited from doing certain things, like becoming ordained or entering a temple, just because she is a woman?

But why does the temple board tell her so? It gives a smorgasbord of reasons: The 8 km trek to the temple along dense woods is arduous for women; Ayyappa is a bachelor God and his bachelorhood will be broken if he sees a woman; the 41-day penance for the pilgrimage, where one must live as abstemiously as a saint, cannot be undertaken by women - they are too weak for that; men cohorts will be enticed to think bad thoughts if women joined them in their trek; letting women into the temple will disrupt law and order; women's menstrual blood will attract animals in the wild and jeopardise fellow travellers; menstruation is a no-no for God.

And so the list of lame reasons grows. Don't think that no one has ever questioned the inanity of those reasons. Several Indian feminists have fought, and keep fighting, with the temple board in favour of the women devotees. But the temple board remains implacable. It is backed by enormous political clout, and poor Indian feminists, like feminists almost everywhere, must fend for themselves. It doesn't help that many Indian women are disinterested in any feminist struggle. They think that it is presumptuous for women to defy established customs. It is hard to rally them, especially when it involves flouting tradition or religion.

Nevertheless, many brave and, sometimes, distressed women, boldly try to go where no young woman has gone before. ...

We women have our own local fights to fight everywhere you go. (I gather that the temple in question, Sabarimala, is just about alone in not admitting women, and is also publicly funded, and there is a bit of a brouhaha going on in India about the whole thing.)

Menstruating women have been barred from doing all sorts of things in just about every culture throughout history and geography; some of the bans have extended to all women in the menstruating age bracket, just to be on the safe side. Menstrual blood is regarded as unclean -- it pretty much epitomizes all that is nasty and weird about women, who are of course just generally nasty and weird anyhow.

I would imagine that the current employment form question does have more to do with stupid stereotypes about women's health status than about our nasty and weird nature.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/storypage/storypage.aspx?id=f96299a4-954b-43e2-9933-2d42d2e890fa&
State Principal Secretary (Health) Chandra lyengar said: "Health problems or aberrations are generally mentioned to assess the officer's physical fitness. But information on menstrual cycles is irrelevant." Other senior women officers termed the queries "insensitive".

They have decided to send a protest letter to the Centre, if required. Additional Chief Secretary (Personnel) Chitkala Zutshi said she would seek clarifications from the Centre. A senior officer at the Prime Minister's Office, who declined to be named, was shocked when HT informed him about the new appraisal format.

"We will check on this," he said. Satyanand Mishra, secretary in the Ministry of Personnel at the Centre, said he had not received any complaint. He said the queries were based on advice from the Ministry of Health. "We sought the ministry's help to draw up a health-history format. I assume this will help evaluate the officer's fitness," Mishra said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. Maybe some women having hysterectomies
Edited on Wed Apr-11-07 07:07 PM by Ilsa
should mail in their old uteruses to the Indian Ministry of Labor or whatever it is, since those people want to take control over them anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. Indian govt. drops this ridiculous idea.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Order_on_womens_intimate_details_nixed/articleshow/1895073.cms

NEW DELHI: An embarrassed Centre has decided to withdraw its controversial circular which stipulated that women bureaucrats provide personal health details like menstrual history and date of last pregnancy in their annual performance appraisal reports.

Government on Wednesday decided to scrap this new clause even before it got any reports from female officers in the controversial format. “A decision to this effect has been taken considering the sensitivity of the issue. A fresh notification deleting those female-specific clauses will be issued shortly,” said a top government official.

The decision came on the day when some Maharashtra women bureaucrats openly expressed reservations over sharing such details in the proforma attached to the All India Services (Performance Appraisal Report) Rules 2007, which was notified on March 14, and decided to lodge a formal complaint with the ministry of personnel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC