|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 01:05 PM Original message |
First 2 sputum tests for TB man prove negative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. Curiouser and curiouser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 01:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. They are just makin a play to curb more freedoms with this stunt. The fucks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiechick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. I disagree ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 03:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. tuskegee experiment...I could go with that. I couldn't figure out why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 04:29 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. Well, never mind his own daughter would be at risk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hippiechick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 07:03 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Please, I don't happen to think it's "ridiculous". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hlthe2b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Actually, no.... repeated negative sputum tests |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
triguy46 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. This is standard practice for TB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 08:13 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. He's got XDR-TB, not MDR-TB. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 03:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. This is one set of "freedoms" I'm willing to curb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StateRed (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 01:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. one of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 01:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. He'll then be "relatively non-contagious" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 01:14 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. relative to what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 01:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Let's put it this way - twice now they have sampled the mucus from deep in his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. The smear negative patients with active TB are still contagious, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
barb162 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 02:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Hell if I know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SlipperySlope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. The whole thing is a set-up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StateRed (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 02:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. you want |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 03:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Why would anyone mind it if they're not going to catch it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 03:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Well, here is the study. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
8. They do not specify WHICH sputum test is coming back negative...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 02:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yes, it's probably the smear that's testing negative. The culture may take as long as 6 weeks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. IIRC, they had already done the smear (it was neg) prior to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 03:04 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Yes, they have known already he was smear negative. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingyouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Thanks for this info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. He's at low risk and probably will be just fine. But he MUST get those |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
triguy46 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 07:52 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. More important, this guy needs to be on DOT: Directly observed therapy... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 08:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. If you are talking about Andrew Speaker, the problem is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kagemusha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 05:41 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. Thank you - VERY informative as to what went down here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 03:17 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. where did you get the "tennis ball" sized mass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingyouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. It was in another thread here (I think it was yesterday) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
triguy46 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 07:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. Generally, aren't they doing an acid fast stain and searching... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-04-07 08:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. He is smear negative. Which we were told before this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC