Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP eyes 'shutdown' of Senate over judges (Southwick postponed)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:30 AM
Original message
GOP eyes 'shutdown' of Senate over judges (Southwick postponed)
Source: Wash Times

June 8, 2007


Republican leaders yesterday threatened a "total shutdown" of Senate business if Democrats keep holding up President Bush's appointments to the federal bench.

"It could cause major meltdown," Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott, Mississippi Republican, said after Democrats postponed a committee vote on the nomination of Leslie H. Southwick to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.

Mr. Lott said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, was "very mad" about judicial appointments and could bring the narrowly divided chamber to a standstill if Democrats don't speed up the confirmation process.

"It could be total shutdown here pretty soon."

Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican and member of the Judiciary Committee, said the delay on Mr. Southwick, a former Mississippi state appellate judge, was par for the course.



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070607-113730-6432r.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Uh oh. Somebody call the waaaaaaaaambulance!
The Repukes are gonna throw a temper tantrum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Here it is!
http://www.smugmug.com.nyud.net:8090/photos/9413235-S.jpg


I personally would tell them that it is in their best re-election interest if no more of Bush's nominees make it. Less chance of an embarrassing meltdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. ROFL!!!!
Just in the nick of time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bring.It.On nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Let them shut it down.
Everyone will know who caused the shutdown, and why. That horrible choice for judge will get more publicity.

Remember how they stonewalled Clinton's judicial appointments? Someone needs to remind them of that. Crybabies. Assholes. Call their bluff, Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. Will they hold up the defense budget?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thank god we've got Harry Reid to stand tough against those nasty Republicans
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. heh heh heh
Harry should threaten to use the "NUKE" option... :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Excellent-Another Republicon ass display
Just keep it up, boys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. Perhaps We Should Give them a Down-or-Down Vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Shut down the whole darn town as far as I am concerned. Send them all to time out.
To do some soul searching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Doesn't work if you don't have a soul.
Sorry to be so sarcastic, cassie. But sometimes I really wonder about Congress and other members of the government. It all seems to be about THEM these days, not about the good of the country and the good of the people. Very very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yes I agree, If they have souls, they are baby souls. Always about themselves.
And what they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yup.
You and I are old souls, I think. Not these folks. Barely have their feet wet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Earth is a one room school house, with many levels of development.
We have to let everyone learn at their own pace.
But it is frustrating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yes it is, my friend.
Yes it is. Especially for an "I want it, and I want it NOW!" person such as myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. I guess our lesson is to learn patience :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. What is this patience of which you speak?
:shrug:

You know I kid. Perhaps you are right, my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. LOL..... A foreign concept I know.... not my strong suit either.
Edited on Fri Jun-08-07 05:05 AM by cassiepriam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well
There is no major threat there. Shut it down.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smtpgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. Oh, are we now re-living the infamous shutdown of Congress
Edited on Fri Jun-08-07 03:54 AM by smtpgirl
from 1995. when Newty the "speaker" had a tantrum with the Big Dog!!!!


After the Republicans in Congress shut down the government in 1995 in a showdown with President Bill Clinton, Gingrich's popularity plunged, never to return to the heights of 1994. By 1996, nearly six in 10 voters had an unfavorable opinion of him. Some of his top lieutenants even plotted a coup against him, but Gingrich, ever the survivor, managed to keep his job.

Gee history REALLY repeats itself!!

Times Change, PEOPLE DON'T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. shut it down--no more con judges please. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. Bastards have no fugging shame
They filibustered large numbers of Clinton's judicial appointments (mainly because they hated Clinton), threatened to remove the filibuster, worked out a compromise that essentially said Democrats could have the filibuster as long as they promised to never, ever use it (or it would be straight back the the nuclear option) and now, they want the Dems in control of the Senate to pretend all that didn't happen and just rubber-stamp Chimpy's extreme-right-fringe nominations?

No, fuck them. These are the same guys who maintained their duty to take a through, long-winded look at nominations when Clinton was in office. It's not fairness they want, it's everything tilted in their favour. Wait until they lose the Whitehouse and watch them go straight back to obstructionism and manufacturing an impeachment scandal. They don't understand concepts like fairness, dignity or responsibility any more. All they care about now is momentary political advantage.

The bastards are fucking around with teh rule of law so let's see teh Dems hang this around their necks like a noose (except they won't, teh Dems still haven't learned to go for the throat).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. Not exactly
I agree with most of the post, but the Republicans didn't filibuster Clinton's judicial nominees. They didn't have to, because they just didn't hold hearings on them. Or if they held a hearing, they never put the nomination to a vote. After a year of screwing around, Clinton would withdraw the nominee's name, and try again with someone else, who would be subject to the same treatment.

So when Trenty gets out on his front porch and starts yelling at the kids on his lawn, I think the only reasonable response is to point and laugh at the clueless old fart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
23. Oh no! Not the nuclear option!
They didn't like it when the Dems threatened to use it but it's ok now that the the GOP has the WMD. Go figure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
24. Do it!
make it clear once and for all - that whether you (GOP senate) are in the majority or in the minority - you are willing to threaten to shut down the senate (remember the "nuclear option" per GOP majority in the senate?) - make it clear that you, the GOP in congress, are LESS concerned about doing the peoples' business than you are about pushing a radical judicial agenda. That will have a nice echo effect during the next elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
25. Shut it down. It's not like they do anything worthwhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
26. Shut it down. Shut down all of D.C. Keep it shut down until the end of 2008.
Edited on Fri Jun-08-07 06:50 AM by onehandle
Nothing would be better for us than that.

The only down side is that public prosecutions and questioning of Bush administration lackeys would come to a halt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
27. Shut it down. The Republicans vote down any good legislation anyway. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jollyreaper2112 Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. call their bluff
Wrestle these asshole republicans to the mat and geld them with pinking shears. Oh, wait, what am I saying? This is the Cave-on-Everything Congress. Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. I wonder if Heather Poe and Mary Cheney would like to take a stand on Southwick.
That's what I'd really like to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
32. I know- let's politely ask them to "keep their powder dry" like we were nice enough to always do.
Surely they will listen to us if we speak ask them nicely, in a hushed, lispy voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. Go ahead, make my day!
They've obviously forgotten how good it make the Rethugs look the LAST time they shut down the government...

:evilgrin:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
34. Sounds like the Republicans are playing to win
any bets on whether the Dem "leadership" rolls over... again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
35. Good. Shut it down and no war funding after Sept!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appleannie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. Good reason not ok that idiot
As a judge on the Mississippi Court of Appeals for over ten years, Judge Southwick
amassed a record that favored business and insurance interests, at the expense of workers,
consumers and other victims. In fact, he voted for those interests 89 percent of the time in 180
published split-decision torts and state employment law cases. Moreover, his decisions
involving racism in the workplace, the qualifications of gays and lesbians to be parents,
women’s property rights following the dissolution of a marriage or relationship, and allegations
of racial bias in jury selection, raise questions about his commitment to equal dignity and equal
justice. This report addresses specific cases which raise concerns about Judge Southwick’s
suitability for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench.

http://www.independentjudiciary.org/resources/docs/PreliminaryReportSouthwick.pdf A typical Bush choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgervan Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
37. Shut 'er Down, Good 'Ol Boys....
... dig yourselves deeper into that miles deep hole that you are already in. Amazing how these bushie clowns, with less than 30% approval from us, simply will not admit that they are wrong, and continue to do the exact opposite of what we, the vast majority of Americans, want them to do. I have a strong feeling that the November '08 elections will relegate the repubs to obscurity for a long, long time. Pompous fools. Keep on digging, boys - and say goodbye to power and the good life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
38. Let them.
The public will punish them. Bush is caca in the public's eyes right now. Let them yoke themselves to that sickly ox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
39. Shut it Down! Call their bluff! Use that damn "power" ya got kept dry!
Prediction: Dems will cave yet again...

HELP WANTED: Spines in urgent need for transplant IMMEDIATELY! Send to: Democratic Party Leadership, US Congress, Washington DC...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. You're right that the Democrats
will cave. It's so sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
40. Nuclear option? Shutting down the government? What is the GOP, the party of toddlers?
We don't get our way, we smash your tricycle?

My only worry is that Liebershit might go along with this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
41. Looks like they don't see a need to keep their
ammunition dry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC