Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Moore's 'Sicko' Leaked Onto Web

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 10:52 AM
Original message
Michael Moore's 'Sicko' Leaked Onto Web
Edited on Fri Jun-15-07 10:54 AM by seriousstan
Source: adage.com

LOS ANGELES (AdAge.com) -- Michael Moore's new documentary "Sicko" has been pirated and is now widely available for download on peer-to-peer content sites like www.thepiratebay.org.

Canada stash
Last week, the Oscar winning director announced that he'd decided to stash a copy of "Sicko" in Canada, in case the Federal government decided to impound it over an apparently unauthorized trip to Cuba made during its filming. As it turns out, the hard part won't be getting the film released, but getting audiences to pay to see it now that its available for free.

If the breach is as wide as it appears -- and this reporter downloaded a copy and watched it late Thursday night with ease -- Moore, and his distributor, The Weinstein Company, have a every film maker's worst marketing nightmare on their hands -- how to persuade people to go to the theater to see a show that's available free on the Internet. (Officials at the Weinstein Company were unavailable for comment late Thursday evening.)

---cut---

While it remains to be seen if that is simply Moore's famous showmanship and posturing, or actually true, what is clear is that the blogosphere isn't reacting to the leak with anything approaching apolitical neutrality: One pirate link encouraged potential downloaders to view the film online saying," Watch this free copy and keep $ out of that fat f-cks hands."

"Sicko's" general release date is June 29.


edited for another link

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/15/the_skinny/main2933538.shtml


Read more: http://adage.com/article?article_id=117350
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, I wonder what sort of person would say
"Watch this free copy and keep $ out of that fat f-cks hands."

Wasn't the download link published at Druge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. And ya gotta wonder who put it out there on the web, too?
I dunno if we can write this off as your typical "anarchist asshole" type stunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. NSA at work?
My chronic case of terminal cynicism suggests this is a Rovian-type leak to hit Mr. Moore in the pocketbook. Hope he and Weinstein will discover who leaked/posted it. Nothing is too rotten for these administration bastards.
Impeach the entire lot!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I am with you on that. No matter, though. The message will get through
and I suspect Moore will survive financially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Naw....I'm thinking some ideologue/true believer/tighty rightie who saw an opportunity
and took it. For "the CAUSE" of course. Some idiot who thinks that MM is all things evil because of F/911.

Here's the irony, though. My understanding is that this film gets raves from left, right, far right, and center. Even wingnuts pay too much for health insurance. Even wingnuts have trouble affording prescriptions. So, the wingnuts who might refuse to pay to see the film, but who watch the film online may just find out, to their shock and awe, that they AGREE with this guy they regarded as a nemesis.

The effort may have, as efforts often do, unintended consequences!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Almost every release is on the Net
**Every** movie that has come out this summer hit the Net's free movie sites within days of coming out in the theater. Pirates, Disturbia, Oceans, Knocked Up, Hostel II. Not just clips, but the whole movie. I'd be more surprised if Sicko didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. No kidding...
I first saw it listed 3 days ago as DVDrip (not a CAM) and I didn't think it was news except folks like Matt Drudge
:shrug:

I stopped counting after 17 different torrents...one has nearly 4000 seeds!

I saw Spiderman 3 like moments after it was released, but it sure didn't hurt it's box office.

Same with Disturbia -- that's a big sleeper hit, but I noticed copies of that weeks ago. If anything, for smaller movies like Sicko, the usually scaled down torrent version (.avi) of a movie is a Preview....people want to make sure they are not wasting their money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. 4000 seeds doesn't happen for even Star Wars Movies

Obviously there are some Freep-types willing to break the law to seed this film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Yes it does
The huge number of seeds are fairly typical of a highly anticipated film by a controversial director, especially when it's leaked weeks before the release. Remember, torrents have gained in popularity as well over the years. And torrent sites are in large part international. Moore has a huge international fan base.

I see no RW conspiracy. The seeds are actually indicitive of the interest his films have, which by this measure is a good sign. I don't think pre release leaks onto torrent sites will really hurt the film's box office receipts either. H

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. and how many people here will be willing
to break the law so they can get a preview? You wont hear me complain because I, like many others, are living in a glass house when it comes to this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. currently there is 1340 seeders for sicko at 6:am GMT


Why is someone claiming that there is 4000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeighAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. What's wrong is the fact the Drudge linked to it
Sure, people who pirate movies would have been able to see it, but Drudge made sure everybody knew that they could watch it for free, to try to f-up MM's box office sales. Hope he gets sued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck that! He's getting my money! Well deserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nomad559 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. :- )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. How is this a surprise? Just about every bit of film and audio ever recorded...
...is out there and reachable by anyone with a computer.

Non-news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xilet Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Standard Practice
Most films (as well as albums) are leaked the same day, and in some cases weeks before they are released to the general public. It only takes one insider to leak a copy of the film, or even a screener then the entire world gets it. This is par for the course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. yep
If Moore's movie had not been leaked out to the net it would have been an exception to the rule.

Love MM's work and hope makes some nice $$ but just about any movie you want is available on the net if you know where to look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. I will happily pay to see it at my local theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LifeDuringWartime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. After seeing it I definitely will.
I wasn't sure if I wanted to pay to see the movie. I wasn't a big fan of Bowling for Columbine or Fahrenheit 9/11, but Sicko is really a great film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rottenmac Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'm sure it was...
an 'anarchist asshole' or maybe a student obsessed with the P2P system, or maybe just some kid who had nothing better to do with his time. P2P doesn't mean significantly less profits for many movie studios. Xmen, Spider-man, and many others (aside from Spider 3, which was horrible...) will do fairly well regardless of how much it is shared.

Watching a film in a theater is a wholly different experience than on your tiny monitor at crap resolution with bad sound.

That said, whomever made the comments is probably a minor who has no idea of how something like this affects him/her directly. If he was over the age of 25 in his own crap apartment, with a minimum wage job, he might feel differently.

Or maybe not.

Let's not dive into the deep-end of the conspiracy pool just yet folks. There are enough of those people 'out there' already. Pun intended.

/rant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LifeDuringWartime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. doubtful
Moore has said in the past that he cares more about people seeing the films. The files online are ripped from DVD screeners, which are distributed to reviewers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I always wondered how the MPAA etc could justify
going after people who download the screeners, when it is the studios themselves putting the screener DVDs in the hands of the reviewers.

Doesn't that seem a bit... well, counterproductive? Why aren't they showing the films to reviewers in special closed theater sessions? It's as if they're inviting their own reviewers to put it up for download or something....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #31
42. This was a big issue with 'Roger and Me'
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 08:40 AM by Tuttle
Moore refused to let a reviewer, Pauline Kael have a private copy of the film for a preview-review session: he insisted she watch it in a theater, like everyone else. So she boarded a bus, on a snowy afternoon in Great Barrington, Massachusetts and rode to NYC and there, she gave birth to the Michael Moore Bashing phenomena by panning it and pronouncing it "all out of sequence". This, then excluded the film for consideration as an Oscar nominee, to the chagrin of Moore and to the delight of the right wingnuts in the late 80s.

Tut-tut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LifeDuringWartime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #31
46. This is actually commonplace sometimes.
If there's a big movie that hasn't been leaked before release, that's probably why.

I remember reading an article a few years ago about major music labels sending portable CD players glued shut to reviewers so they couldn't rip the disc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sounds like an act of Right Wing Corporate Espionage. They can't refute the message, so they kill it
Moore's movie being leaked is likely the result of right-wing activity. They so hate him and his message that they will do anything to damage his ability to make a profit and turn out more TRUTH TELLING films.

I could easily download the film, as could others here, but I say that we should make it our mission to see it in the theaters to rob the right-wing assholes of any espionage victory.

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Not really... This is nothing new
I mean, I'm failing to see why this being "leaked" is any different than every other movie that seems to get leaked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. It is not different...
But people here always love a good conspiracy theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. I don't think this will hurt box office receipts.
People will not watch streaming two-hour movies. I've tried it multiple times, and it does not hold my attention. I can watch a streaming video for maybe 10-15 minutes. The eye perceives monitor images differently from how it perceives an image projected onto a screen.

This will turn out to be a gift of free publicity - and I've heard there's no such thing as bad publicity in the movie business.

Hell - I wouldn't put it past Moore to approve putting this out there himself. It's information that must be shared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. People like theaters, I agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tunkamerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. People do all the time.
Hundreds of sites for that singular purpose. I doubt they would exist if people didn't use them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. I'll assert they're not a significant proportion of the movie-going population. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Agree
I've been watching some of PBS's Frontline on the Internet. Luckily they break it down into roughly 10 minute segments. I watch one segment a night.

I've sampled the odd film and teevee series via streaming to see if I'd be interested in buying partially blind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayWhatYo Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Also, how many people will watch the whole thing from the net
then go to the movies to watch it, or at least rent or buy it when it comes out on DVD? I know I do that a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
44. Me either. Part of the fun of a MM film is seeing it with a large group
the audience reactions are sometimes as memorable as the film.

Like you, I can't sit at my Mac for a two hour movie. And I think it would be a bit savvy of Moore to leak it to the pirates ahead of time; creates a real buzz, and ensures that it's OUT there! (Not that I endorse piracy. I've worked on a number of major motion pictures myself and box office is what paid my salary)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. Watched it from the net today, but will buy a copy and/or see it in the theatre
when it is released.

I wouldn't put it past Moore to release it undercover himself, especially if there was distribution difficulty.

The quality is DVD... it isn't a theatre screener.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fazoolius_2006 Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. I too saw it
today and I must say, I really was not impressed. It never really hits home like some of his other work. The whole thing seemed to just drag on and on. Anyway, I am surprised that this is even an issue as just about every single movie hits the web before it is in theaters.

Best of luck who go and see this in the theaters, I am going to see Die Hard 4 so that I can numb my mind and escape the insanity that is the world today.

Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronopio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
55. SiCKO has a gentler and more serious tone, but it's more immediate and scary.
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 04:48 PM by OmelasExpat
People looking for the entertaining, and entirely justified MM stunts like bringing a group of ex-smokers with tracheotomies to sing "Jingle Bells" in the lobby of R.J. Reynolds might be disappointed.

The health care fiasco is an act of slow, deliberate corporate genocide for profit and it directly affects everyone. Most people will make a more personal connection to this movie than Moore's previous films. I don't know how Michael could have taken a "TV Nation" tone to it without slighting the topic, and the moviegoers in a personal way.

It will be very scary to many people because it deftly alludes to something far more fundamental than even the health care fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm not real sure Moore cares
he wanted people to download/pirate Fahrenheit 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. It is adorable that people think this is news
Someone above mentioned that the theater experience is vastly different from the pirated at-home experience. You bet it is: privacy, cold beer in my hand, volume not at ear-splitting levels, clean floor, ability to stop and start film at will, screen I can see all of at once. Yep, vastly different quality levels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. A lot of movies are pirated before the release and a lot of people still go see it nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
27. Attention RIAA -- Claude Brodesser-Akner is daring you to fine him
Edited on Fri Jun-15-07 02:04 PM by KurtNYC
He admits to breaking the laws listed below and he is ancouraging others to do so in order to "keep $ out of that fat f-cks hands"

Well Claude congratulations you investigative genius. You just qualified for:

up to five years in prison and $250,000 in fines. Repeat offenders can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. Violators can also be held civilly liable for actual damages, lost profits, or statutory damages up to $150,000 per infringement, as well as attorney’s fees and costs.

Wow that was an expensive little article to write eh? I'm just glad he wasn't investigating how easy it would have been for OJ to kill his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
32. Either way, Michael wins!
Edited on Fri Jun-15-07 03:34 PM by Lisa
The pirate who was urging people to view it for free, out of spite, doesn't seem to realize that those who might not otherwise see the movie could well be swayed by its arguments!

Anyway, watching a Moore film while huddled over your computer is just not the same as seeing it in a big theatre, and hearing the audience's laughter and gasps of outrage. I'm hoping that many of the downloaders will go to a public screening once the movie is released, to experience the full effect.

In fact, I am planning to donate DVD copies of "Sicko" to the local library, once it's released. People with restricted incomes, and those who have to stay at home due to health issues or small kids to look after, will have a chance to view it then. I have done this with his other films ... I checked with Michael when he was in Vancouver several years ago, and not only did he approve, he wrote a special note to my favourite librarian!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. Right wing conspiracy theory? LOL
Really c'mon. This is just another summer movie, meaning it WILL be pirated.

Seriously though, almost all movies are pirated now. Has anyone been to a torrent site and seen how many movies are available? Want F 9/11? Bowling for Columbine? Roger and Me? They're all there...

What about the summer's biggest hits? Spiderman 3, Pirates, Oceans, etc. EVERYTHING IS AVAILABLE. Now the question is, would you rather see a copy at home or in the theater, possibly hearing audience reactions? It might be an interesting experience.

And this movie is not solely about making a profit. Moore wants as many people to see as possible. It's about a message. My hope is that the distribution is also wide, which will get it good enough box office receipts though I'm sure even on a smaller scale it will do well financially. Moore knows he's financially set. The success of this film won't determine whether or not he'll continue to make movies that go after the powerful and greedy.

So the RWers are idiots if they think by pirating this, it will hurt it in the box office. All the above summer films have been pirated and have made a ton of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Well geez,
Edited on Fri Jun-15-07 08:11 PM by durtee librul
now the RW'ers can all watch it in the privacy of their homes....well ok, they might have Agent Mike watching too while they download it.....but really, this way they don't have to go 'public' to see the movie so their rw neighbors see them at the cineplex.

Wonder if Georgie has one of his email hacks downloading it for him?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
40. something like HALF of what is out there is a bullshit freeper virus-ridden trojan
be careful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #40
53. That's the thing about downloading this stuff...you don't know what ELSE...
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 02:25 PM by Triana
...you're downloading with it.

We had an idiot come in the other day with TWENTY THREE damned spyware programs on his system, TWO keyloggers and several viruses.

WHY? Because he was downloading films at BitTorrent.

He was told to save his data and format the disk and start over.

What an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. Easier to wait til everything gets to one of the free sites
Ahem, least that is what I hear....every release makes it there, sometimes within **hours** of the first theater showing.

Allegedly directs to you another site that lets you allegedly watch it without downloading..it just streams the video, like you would watch on YouTube or sometimes it is full screen.
Usually good quality...from what I have heard, that is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. I love my Mac. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
43. Well, *I* for one will see it in the theater when it opens amid the cornacopia...
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 08:44 AM by KansDem
of high-fructose corn syrup based soft drinks, artificial popcorn butter, and artificially favored and colored snacks.

Mind you, I won't be consuming any of this crap, but I thought the irony would be delightful!

on edite: overpriced irony at that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroubleMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
45. This happens to every single movie that comes out....nothing special about this.

This is really a non-issue. Every single album, video game, movie, and computer program is available for download from as early to a month before it comes out (sometimes it doesn't come out until the day of release).

This has never affected movies before and it won't affect his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpikeTss Donating Member (308 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
47. He will get my money, I'll go to the cinema to see it

I like his films, but I would also do it just to show the rightwing nutjob,

who tries to damage a progressive filmmaker,

that this kind of action results in exactly the opposite

of what he intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
48. Story is interesting, Sicko is not WIDELY available
This story seems to be ahead of itself. Usually pirated movies show up first in either IIRC or Usenet binary groups. Usenet doesn't have it at all, if it was WIDELY available it would be there. I haven't looked on IIRC but the fact that its no where to be seen on Usenet leads me to believe that this was leaked with the authors knowledge and is an attempt to get it widely distributed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Bittorrent
Someone either in this thread or another on the same subject said that there were something over 4000 seeds. That's the widest availability I've ever seen; even the pay content via Azureus has only a few hundred seeds at best.

I should point out that the download bitrate of Usenet has in my experience always been slower than the rate of my HTTP and FTP connections. I suspect they intentionally dial it down to prevent exactly that use.

Bittorrent has made Usenet a bit... irrelevant for handling large files.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuttle Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. It's on alt.binaries.movies.xvid
also alt.binaries.multimedia and
alt.binaries.xvid.movies

http://www.newzbin.com/search/query/p/?q=sicko&Category=-1&searchFP=p

The advantage that usenet has over the torrents is how users will flame a posting with malware/spyware attached.

Tut-tut

PS: search for other blockbusters at newzbin: if you know the right lingo, they are all there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. It's on Youtube now, actually.
Edited on Sun Jun-17-07 07:41 PM by rainbow4321
In 13 different parts. Video is like 15 seconds ahead of the audio but still watchable/understandable.


I will still go see it in the theater, though..same reason I bought 2 of the Dixie Chicks CD (their movie soundtrack) instead of burning one of them...one for my daughter who listens to it in the house, and one for both of us to listen to in the car. Cuz I am more than happy to give $$ to artists who expose the current US regime for what they are...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
49. Yeah, cuz everyone has high speed internet access, and the
Edited on Sat Jun-16-07 12:45 PM by Coventina
software & knowledge to do peer-to-peer sharing.
And everyone would prefer to sit hunched in front of their computer, listening to their crappy little speakers rather than in a theatre with dolby or THX.

whatever.

:eyes:

If that were the case, all the movie theatres would be closed long before now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakeguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
51. bah, this happens with many movies...
anybody who hates moore enough to 'encourage' others to download illegal copies won't watch the movie anyway. neither will his or her friends that actually listen to the creep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
52. I will PAY to see this film thankyouverymuch....
...AND I will BUY a legit copy of my own when it is available for sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-16-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
56. "Nobody" would see Bowling For Columbine or Fahrenheit 9/11, either
We live in a small rural town. I went to the DVD rental place the morning "Fahrenheit 9/11" was out on DVD. We'd seen it in the theater, we wanted to see it again, and I wanted to buy a copy. The employee there firmly told me that "nobody" would be interested in that movie, that they wouldn't be stocking it, and why did I want to see "lies," anyway? I'm happy to say that the employee must have had to eat her words, because the owner told me they couldn't bring in DVD's of "Fahrenheit 9/11" fast enough, and they were continuously rented for six months after release.

My husband and I have a date on June 29th to see the movie in the theater. We're more than happy to spend $20 to see one of the more important films of the year.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-17-07 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
57. Anyone who thinks that the RW
would leak this film is freakin nuts, roflmao. They certainly do not want this movie being spread far and wide.

Moore has handed out free copies of his movies in the past and has leaked his own movies in the past. He's a real smart guy. This could only be good for him. Why on earth do you think he would pick a town of 1000 people to premiere the movie if all he was after was record box office sales?

Like I said, he's a smart guy. It's one of those things where no one has to do anything, the players just play their natural parts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC