Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush administration seeks secrecy for Supreme Court proceedings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 02:38 AM
Original message
Bush administration seeks secrecy for Supreme Court proceedings
The Bush administration asked the Supreme Court to let it keep its arguments secret in a case involving an immigrant's challenge of his treatment after the September 11 attacks.

Mohamed Kamel Bellahouel wants the high court to consider whether the government acted improperly by secretly jailing him after the attacks and keeping his court fight private. He is supported by more than 20 journalism organisations and media companies.

<snip>

Lucy A Dalglish, executive director of The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said she was disappointed by the government's request.

"The idea that there is nothing that could be filed publicly is really ridiculous," she said. "It just emphasises our point that we're living in frightening times. People can be arrested, thrown in jail and have secret court proceedings, and we know absolutely nothing about it."

source: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/01/06/1073268010767.html
________________________________________________________________

This request was filed by none other than our old friend, Ted Olson. When Ted Olson is on something, it matters a great deal to the Neocons. What's being hidden now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe Ted bought his wife's plane ticket after Condi warned him n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 02:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. that's insane
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. This entire Constitution be kept secret! Because if terrorists ever
learned about the Bill of Rights, our entire way of life would be threatened!

"On the bright side," Bush stated, "terrorists don't have any reason to hate us anymore."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. There are so many stories that we should be seeing ad naseum
Edited on Wed Jan-07-04 12:33 PM by lovedems
all over the news! It continues to boggle my mind though I remain unsurprised at the utter complacency of the media. Secrecy is bad, it means there is something to hide. I watched nightline last night and there were clips of the chimp and his hencemen talking up Saddam before the war. My husband and I sat there in disbelief that their pre-war comments weren't played over and over again to remind the people WE WERE LIED TO! (Ted Koppel totally kicked ass IMO) It just surprises me that stories like this (pre war intelligence, 9/11 stonewalling, Plame investigation, crappy medicare and energy bills, ETC. ETC. ETC) aren't all over the place now that we are officially in an election year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. The secrecy of this administration is unbelieveable!
Who the fuck do they think they work for??? This attitude is a slap in the face of every American who believes in good, transparent government!

"We expect there to be transparency. People who have something to hide make us nervous."
Actual Bush quote - Anchorage, Alaska, Feb. 16, 2002

Yeah... right!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. And "Open Government" is what makes America Great
"They hate us for our freedoms" the Bush* Cabal that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "They hate us for our freedoms"
Edited on Wed Jan-07-04 02:58 PM by kayell
Shouldn't the terrorists be sending us some flowers and candy right about now?

* has been working so hard to make them love us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Well shouldn't they stop hating us so much, since the bushies
are curtailing our freedoms more and more by the day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. grrrrrrrr
What will they do though if the Supreme Court says, sorry open proceeding?!?!?
It's not outside of the realm of possibility.
True conservatives (strict constructionists) have this strange tendency to believe in old fashioned things like habeas corpus, the bill of rights etc.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Hope you are right
But I ain't holdin' my breath. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I'm just an optimist
for some strange reason.
I hope I'm correct too.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. see also:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. Didn't there used to be something similar called a "Star Chamber"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Don't YOu Mean Starr---Ken Starr Chamber? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC