Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton's Letter to Bush: No Permanent Bases in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 07:09 PM
Original message
Clinton's Letter to Bush: No Permanent Bases in Iraq
Source: Talking Points Memo

November 27, 2007

The Honorable George W. Bush

The White House

Washington , D.C. 20500


Dear Mr. President:


I write with great concern over the text of the Declaration of Principles for a Long-Term Relationship of Cooperation and Friendship Between the Republic of Iraq and the United States of America that the White House released yesterday. I am particularly concerned that this document did not contain any explicit reference or language that indicates that the United States will not seek and will not maintain permanent military bases in Iraq. Moreover, the document's failure to note any intent to begin the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq is a missed opportunity to pressure Iraq's leaders to make the compromises necessary to achieve political reconciliation in Iraq.

As you know, in 2006, Congress explicitly passed a restriction on the use of any funds to establish any military installation or base for the permanent stationing of United States Forces in Iraq. However, the Declaration of Principles that you signed with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki does not explicitly rule out permanent U.S. bases in Iraq. Rather, the Declaration instead calls for agreements between the two governments "with respect to the political, cultural, economic, and security spheres" to be achieved by July 2008. Indeed, press reports indicate that Lieutenant General Douglas Lute, your coordinator for Iraq policy, stated, "It's too soon to tell" what shape and size the future U.S. military relationship with Iraq would take. Given the express will of Congress and the American people to oppose permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq, the failure to include express language addressing this issue in the Declaration of Principles with the Iraqi government is deeply troubling. To be clear, attempts to establish permanent bases in Iraq would damage U.S. interests in Iraq and the broader region, and I will continue to strongly oppose such efforts.

Furthermore, the Declaration of Principles does not reference any agreement to reduce the number of U.S. troops in Iraq. When you first announced the escalation of U.S. troops earlier this year, the ostensible purpose was to provide the Iraqis with the "breathing space" to achieve political reconciliation. By any meaningful measurement, that political reconciliation has not yet occurred. The absence of any reference to a redeployment of U.S. troops from Iraq in the Declaration of Principles is a missed opportunity to put pressure on the Iraqis to engage in the compromises necessary for political reconciliation.

I urge you to clarify the Declaration of Principles with the Iraqi government to confirm that the United States does not plan to place any permanent bases within Iraq and instead plans to begin the phased redeployment of U.S. troops. Such a clarification would make clear to the citizens of both nations that the U.S. military presence in Iraq is temporary and encourage Iraqi political leaders to make greater efforts towards political reconciliation.

Thank you for your consideration


Sincerely yours,


Hillary Rodham Clinton


cc: The Honorable Condoleezza Rice

The Honorable Robert Gates

The Honorable Stephen Hadley

Lt. General Douglas Lute

No link yet.



Obama and other Democratic candidates have issued the same type of statements insisting on no permanent military bases in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good.
Recommended :kick: #1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fool_Me_Once Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. She has some nerve....
to call these people Honorable.

The Honorable Condoleezza Rice

The Honorable Robert Gates

The Honorable Stephen Hadley

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good move Sen. Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. just where does she expect to keep her 70,000 troops
Edited on Tue Nov-27-07 08:49 PM by leftchick
she wants for "training Iraqi troops and fighting al-qaida" in Iraq for the next twenty years? In the Embassy? give me a fucking break. She really does believe we are STUPID!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. They're not her troops, or any president's troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well that is a surprise.
I was specifically asking where our candidates where regardin Bush pushing bases in Iraq just yesterday.... I like it ... Good move Hillary... I may have to start relooking at you as a potential real DEMOCRATIC candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why does she not
make any mention of the protection of maliki against any internal coup? Why not the mention of preferencial treatment of American contractors?

It is good as far as she went. She does mention permanent bases. She does not mention long term bases. What is the difference?

Why don't I trust her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. What about this?
If the U.S. is ultimately leaving Iraq, why is the military building 'permanent' bases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Because were not leaving.. .at least in my lifetime... I guess its all a
political game of semantics.... Depends on the meaning of the word permanent... in context do we have permanent bases in Germany or Cuba or Korea... The answer simply is no... the only place we have permanent military bases is in the U.S. again contexting the word permanent...

Now Hillary can have it all ways from any spin she wants... I opposed permanent bases but built temp bases that lasted for 80 years....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. ssssshhhhhh
she thinks we are stupid and do not know about them. sssshhhhh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushLiesDaily Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. nice posturing Hillary...
wake me when it's over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. Oh, so she thinks we should redeploy in 75-100 years.
But none of that permanent stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-28-07 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. Jr. to Clinton----talk to the hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC