|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 10:25 AM Original message |
House vote on illegal images sweeps in Wi-Fi, Web sites |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
1. isn't it grand how they can unite to pass unconstitutional laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trogdor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 12:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Kiddie pr0n isn't protected by the First Amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 12:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. true, but otherwise 'obscene' images are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Doctor. (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:18 PM Response to Reply #19 |
126. Describe 'obscene'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 09:35 PM Response to Reply #126 |
141. holy crap! kitty porn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 12:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Kiddie pr0n isn't at all what this is about- here are my suspicions: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:06 PM Response to Reply #22 |
44. Excellent post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BadgerKid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:31 PM Response to Reply #22 |
54. Tend to agree. One more thing: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swagman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
74. this is NOTHING to with child porn-it's about control of the free |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:55 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. Well said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:01 PM Response to Reply #74 |
85. I'll second that. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:49 PM Response to Reply #74 |
114. Gonzo said that?!?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
heliarc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #22 |
76. The internet.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
84. you have got it exactly right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:34 PM Response to Reply #22 |
96. but, but - the children? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
100. First step in control using the kiddie porners as an excuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:30 PM Response to Reply #22 |
104. This is the library Internet access issue all over again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
110. My bet is the money issue is first and foremost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:17 PM Response to Reply #22 |
124. BINGO! The child-porn excuse is just a pretense folks, a RUSE (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NBachers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
135. Pimping out Kiddie Porn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 01:55 PM Response to Reply #16 |
28. ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trogdor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #28 |
49. Ouch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
50. Read the definition in the statute before you make that statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU9598 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
55. This only addresses kiddie porn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
86. Don't you recognize the slippery slope here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
95. including "obscene" cartoons and drawings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
146. But This IS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DissedByBush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
149. Don't Panic! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #149 |
150. that's where it always starts... it's a slippery slope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DissedByBush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 12:59 AM Response to Reply #150 |
152. Paranoid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 06:34 AM Response to Reply #152 |
157. Don't you ALREADY have a responsibility to report a crime? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 07:16 AM Response to Reply #152 |
161. Paranoia is simply a heightened sense of awareness, as the saying goes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 08:54 AM Response to Reply #152 |
162. And how exactly are you supposed to determine what 'it' is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brrrp (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 02:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
168. No more child porn at Starbucks? Sigh. :) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 10:44 AM Response to Original message |
2. Smells like commercial broadband providers trying to hobble free wifi n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:14 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. My impression too. Why was wifi specifically chosen as opposed to all internet connections? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xxqqqzme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
66. exactly my first thought. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trogdor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 12:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
17. Think about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 12:23 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. What the hell is an illegal cartoon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 01:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. Google "Hentai" with the family filter off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chovexani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:41 PM Response to Reply #27 |
77. All hentai is not child rape |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xithras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:15 PM Response to Reply #77 |
91. Ah, I wouldn't know. I don't look at it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chovexani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 09:23 PM Response to Reply #91 |
140. It's not really my cup of tea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:27 PM Response to Reply #27 |
128. "I'm on the fence as to whether or not it should actually be illegal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 06:45 AM Response to Reply #27 |
158. Thank you, your description is enough, I'm not going to view |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:45 PM Response to Reply #18 |
98. good question ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 06:55 AM Response to Reply #98 |
160. Think what is the real target here? It's the free wi-fi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 05:44 AM Response to Reply #18 |
155. ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:08 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. One big problem with wireless network monitoring... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalArkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:48 PM Response to Reply #29 |
80. You have hit it.. The person using that open wap is not paying.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:21 PM Response to Reply #80 |
92. They obviously hate the people that provide free wifi too. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shipwack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:31 PM Response to Reply #29 |
105. These things don't have to be enforced... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 09:57 PM Response to Reply #105 |
142. In other word, it can be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 10:05 PM Response to Reply #17 |
143. In reality that just menas that mcdonalds can't have wifi anymore, because they can't possibly check |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 10:06 PM Response to Reply #143 |
144. So this actually legitimizes illegal spying. Which is the big FISA argument right now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
3. As usual... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikeytherat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Puritanism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:11 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Mencken... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shipwack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:37 PM Response to Reply #6 |
106. Mencken thoughts,,, The first is most relevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B3Nut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
5. How can they report what they cannot even see? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. And there's not even one Democrat in Congress who opposes this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. But anyone voting against this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flashl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. This is how they shutdown the ma and pa ISPs who didn't comply with the government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:56 PM Response to Reply #23 |
134. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
111. Its hillariously assinine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
112. Damn, dude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:55 PM Response to Reply #5 |
116. You are exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 10:09 PM Response to Reply #116 |
147. change+MAC+address |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 01:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
166. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
9. more justification for telecom immunity and FISA? They HAVE TO track every |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
10. You mean obscene images like this one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:10 PM Response to Reply #10 |
45. They should amend the bill to require reporting obscene images like this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
57. Agggggrrrrrhhhhh My eyes! My eyes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dethl (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
12. Incentive for Wi-Fi operators.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
115. DING! There it is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rockybelt (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
13. You will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 01:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
26. SwampRat will be in for some major trouble. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
145. EXACTLY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
14. "the Democratic leadership rushed the SAFE Act to the floor under a procedure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wellst0nev0ter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
15. Ah, I See The Hard Won Committee Chairmanships Are Working As Expected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
20. Ron Paul? Where was Dennis K? I sure as hell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dethl (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 12:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Nope. He was there...and voted FOR it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pokercat999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 06:50 AM Response to Reply #21 |
159. Mine too, this is just a bill to enable the phone company to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
24. How the hell would you do that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yodermon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
25. complete bullshit. This technically impossible to accomplish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:37 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. A Congressional Christmas present to the corporate broadband cabal. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:43 PM Response to Reply #25 |
36. They'll "discover" that it doesn't work down the road.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
43. How about this little nugget? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BronxBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
109. Actually you are not stretching things at all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:29 PM Response to Reply #25 |
52. Here's a thought on how to 'enforce' that law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MetaTrope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:32 PM Response to Reply #25 |
72. In a nation where the only "terrorists" caught so far have been malcontents given uniforms by FBI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmicdot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
30. Senate version of the bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #30 |
59. co-sponsors: Sen Clinton, Hillary Rodham - 3/20/2007 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
31. Nucking futs once again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
32. "It's for the children!!!!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brokensymmetry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
33. So a cartoon of a certain Beloved Pretzeldent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mrspeeker (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
35. Ah the Democratic Congress at work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaineYooper (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
37. I believe every image of Pat Robertson is obscene- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
38. So what constitutes as an obscene image, exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Psephos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 02:56 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Oh, don't worry, just leave it to the police n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:00 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Slipping away? they are gone. The concept of freedom is that we have a say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brokensymmetry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:03 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. Is that image obscene? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. LOL. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:39 PM Response to Reply #38 |
107. This was the first obscene image that came to my mind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:05 PM Response to Reply #107 |
122. HA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
41. Is this about copywrite protection for Japanese anime and manga? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chovexani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:44 PM Response to Reply #41 |
78. I don't think politicians even know fandom exists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nealmhughes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
46. That will be nearly physically impossible to imeplement. Web servers rely upon self-policing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
47. And this paragraph, reminds me of the the Republican head of the FCC's tactics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happygoluckytoyou (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
51. IM OKAY SO LONG AS WE COVER WHAT IS IS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:30 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Must you scream? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BronxBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:45 PM Response to Reply #51 |
113. You do know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 08:56 AM Response to Reply #51 |
163. so trusting and all caps too. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kimmylavin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
56. The SAFE act? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
58. So, it follows that: If I put WEP or WAP encryption, I do not have an "OPEN" connection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatholicEdHead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:02 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Ideally WPA (or even better WPA2), as WEP can be cracked in 10min |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. Not MY fault : ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElboRuum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:29 PM Response to Reply #61 |
129. Ahh. Yes... BUT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 09:15 PM Response to Reply #58 |
139. How much you want to bet, if you asked all of the MOC who voted for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
60. Define "obscene" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
62. America the police state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoddessOfGuinness (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
63. What is obscene? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
California Griz (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
65. Moronic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mountainman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
67. I'll tell you, this Democratic controlled congress sure hasn't been the body I expected it to be! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllyCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
68. My personal anecdote why I think this has NOTHING to do with kids |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:32 PM Response to Reply #68 |
73. that's because the courts are clogged with accusations during ugly divorces. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllyCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #73 |
75. You make a good point, but wouldn't they want to see it just to be able to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
69. Hmm...let's say I have WiFi at my house |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rAVES (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
70. Big Brother is watching you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
71. I applaud any efforts to stop Child Pornography, this just seems unworkable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:36 PM Response to Reply #71 |
97. "any efforts"? really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:57 PM Response to Reply #71 |
118. Sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
79. They just keep chipping away at any freedom you have left. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FiveGoodMen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #79 |
88. Never occurs to anyone that the children grow up into a crappy world because of our "protection" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
81. Any way this garbage can be Constitutionally challenged? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
83. It seems we have elected a dem congress more repuke than the repukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sui generis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
87. always pandering to the lowest common denomator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sss1977 (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
89. for fucks sakes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caoimhe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
90. over-extending and unconstitutional |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gonnuts (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
93. gulp, gulp, gulp ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
94. How big is the problem this is allegedly trying to address? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #94 |
108. Me thinks as widespread an epidemic as rampant D&X procedures. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:59 PM Response to Reply #94 |
120. It isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heywood J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 01:18 PM Response to Reply #120 |
165. Pretty much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
santamargarita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:47 PM Response to Original message |
99. Fascist Pigs Hate the Internet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 05:59 PM Response to Original message |
101. What is interesting is how the bill has not been viewable to the public... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
102. V |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
103. 409 members of Congress have no clue how "the tubes" work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BronxBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:56 PM Response to Reply #103 |
117. And that is the fucking scary thing..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Akoto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 06:58 PM Response to Original message |
119. How can the requirements of this bill possibly be met? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BronxBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:03 PM Response to Original message |
121. Hold on... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:48 PM Response to Reply #121 |
131. Those appear to be different bills |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BronxBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 08:00 PM Response to Reply #131 |
137. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:06 PM Response to Original message |
123. Is it any wonder why congressional approval ratings are so low? The mfs sold us out again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
populistdriven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:27 PM Response to Reply #123 |
127. our government |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
125. There are going to be a lot of pissed off Windoze owners. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
moggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 06:27 AM Response to Reply #125 |
156. There always are n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FatDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
130. Another reason this is technologically unfeasible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heywood J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 01:31 PM Response to Reply #130 |
167. Don't forget the steganography and the like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BronxBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
132. Jeezus Fucking Christ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
guruoo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 10:31 PM Response to Reply #132 |
148. Broken link, fixed: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madeline_con (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
133. "... would cover individuals...that provide Wi-Fi. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BronxBoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
136. My Bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fredda Weinberg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Dec-06-07 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
138. BOGUS ALERT!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #138 |
151. How so? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 01:06 AM Response to Reply #151 |
154. see this link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lvx35 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 01:06 AM Response to Reply #138 |
153. BOGUS ALERT CONFIRMED!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conspirator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Dec-07-07 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
164. fucking fascists, the excuse is child pornography |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC