Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Plan Would Let Seniors Work to Pay Taxes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:24 AM
Original message
Plan Would Let Seniors Work to Pay Taxes
Source: breitbart.com/AP

Audrey Davison lives alone, gets a $620 Social Security check each month and worries about the sharply rising taxes on her four-bedroom house. Davison, 76, raised her family there and after 43 years, she really doesn't want to leave Greenburgh.

Greenburgh doesn't want her to leave, either.

The town is pushing a program that would let seniors work part-time, for $7 an hour, to help pay off some of their property taxes.

"People shouldn't have to sell their house, move away to a place with less taxes, leave behind their family and friends," said Town Supervisor Paul Feiner.

He envisions retired doctors mentoring schoolchildren, retired accountants helping with the town's finances, retired lawyers offering their services for a discount. But there are plenty of less-skilled jobs that need doing, he said.



Read more: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8TOKT9G1&show_article=1



To me this sounds more like indebited servitude. I'm of the opinion that in many cases people are penalized by the insane housing market and for doing their best to keep up their property. And I can't blame seniors who would like to stay in the house in which they raised a family and holds their memories. Property taxes should be better tied to ability to pay and I hate this idea that seems to be becoming ingrained in this country to have to work till the day you're sent to the nursing home or die. I think you should be able to work if you want to, or enjoy your senior years if you want, or hopefully if able you'll be able to be financially secure and volunteer your time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Another effect of the Bush tax cuts for the rich.....
increased property taxes for the middle class. The money taken from these municipalities to support Bush's tax cuts has to come from somewhere and lately it's been in the form of increased property and school taxes.

Yes, let's send our elders back to work for $7.00 an hour so Bush's rich pals can have and keep their tax cuts they so richly deserve. :sarcasm: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. What about the disabled and
others not able to work off their indebtedness to the government?

Ohio has a "homestead exemption" plan for elderly homeowners which reduces the tax burden and which was recently expanded thanks to the efforts of our new Democratic governor Ted Strickland.

Seems a more fair system than this work-till-you-drop plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. This is practically criminal extortion.
You impose impossibly high taxes on people's property which bears no proportion to their income, and then, you offer them the "opportunity" to pay you back at what will soon be about minimum wage. Ms. Davison is disabled, and her property taxes are out of bounds:

Davison, who suffers from arthritis and sciatica and needs a walker to get around on her bad days, said she pays about $12,000 a year in property taxes — perhaps $2,000 to the town — and has already taken out a reverse mortgage to pay her bills.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/mochila/Plan_would_let_seniors_work_to_pay__12252007.

Offering a job to a senior citizen like Ms. Davison is a cruel joke. I have arthritis and sciatica. Mine is not bad, but sitting in an uncomfortable chair is one of the things that can set it off. I have an exercise that either gets rid of it or makes it hurt less, but I have to have a certain kind of surface to do the exercise on. And I cannot drive once I have it.

It is particularly ironic because New York state is where many hedge funds have their homes and where many of their employees are headquartered. Maybe if the hedge funds paid their fair share of taxes, seniors like Ms. Davison would not have to worry about theirs.

Senior citizens often have a difficult time organizing a move and adjusting to living in a new place. It can ultimately speed their deaths. What cruelty!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ptolle Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
56. indeed
One would think that any compassionate, enlightened society could figure out a way to help keep seniors in their life-long homes.It's not as if they've not made their contribution to society.Of course it could be that the descriptors I chose don't really apply to this country any more.Not being all that good at arithmetic I'll not figure what a couple months of the waste in the mess-o-potamia could do in the way of relief for people in this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is disgusting
The program would "let" seniors work part time. hmph
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't this plan basically slave labor for Taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brrrp Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:52 AM
Original message
Sure it is.
It also displaces younger workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like something out of the Middle Ages
It's disgusting that something like this would even be seriously considered. Why not just bring back the debtor prisons? Why not seize children from people who can't pay their taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Welcome to Neocon America.
You will work until you die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Let" them work?
How magnanimous of the town!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. Isn't it ironic that these old people are considered 'debtors' to the
government? I mean, why? What is the government doing for them so that they incur this debt?

Nothing, at all is what the government is doing for them. They just need someone to pay the taxes of corporate America and the upper 5% of this country. So let 'em work until they drop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Are there no prisons?"
"And the union workhouses? Are they still in operation?"

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. "They are. I wish I could say they were not."
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. This is a personifaction of the compassionate conservative.
My wife is on disability social security, I am on social security and I have to work to make ends meet. But I can only make about $250 a week until I turn 66 or my benefits will be reduced by 2 to 1 if I make over $12,400.00 per year.

It is absolutely disgusting that these goddamned politicians can only think of how to get elderly people out there working instead of reducing taxes. What a bunch of ass-holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. The phrase you want is "indentured servitude"
From the Wikipedia article on indentured servant:

An indentured servant is a laborer under contract of the employer for some period of time, usually seven years, in exchange for such things as ship's passage, food, and accommodations.

A major problem with the system of indentured servitude was that in many cases, an indentured servant would become indebted to their employer, who would forgive the debt in exchange for an extension to the period of their indenture, which could thereby continue indefinitely. In other cases, indentured servants were subject to violence at the hands of their employers in the homes or fields in which they worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
47. Thanks - I know the phrase I wanted
Blame it on early morning should've been in bed dyslexia!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. why not a property tax exemption for low income seniors?
not everybody can work... lots of seniors are sick.. My mom tried to go back to work after a quintuple bypass. She lasted 1 day and quit because she couldnt do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. You can only give tax breaks to special CORPORATE interests n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
70. Because then ...

Because then high income seniors would still have to pay property taxes. The whole point of pushing all these universal tax increases was to coax universal exemptions and break yet another level of progressive taxation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
15.  This is the real Death Tax.
Work until you die making the so called Death Tax a reality afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
54. "The Matrix" May as Well Be Real (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. this is insane
working for the government to pay off your government tax bill?

BTW, NY/NJ have, for as long as I can remember, the most brutal property tax rates in the country (one reason why I left NY - currently I pay 1/3 of my last NY residence's tax bill and my garbage still gets collected, the police patrol the streets, the schools are open, kids are being educated and the streets get plowed).

Property taxes, even with senior citizen, veteran and disability exemptions, really hammer folks on a fixed income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. The idea is beneath contempt. Get these assholes to a library and make them read Charles Dickens.
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 09:36 AM by blondeatlast
Revolting and utterly disrespectful. Ugn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. My idea for property tax exemptions:
I say freeze property taxes when you turn 65. The government can continue to assess the property and maintain an account of what the actual taxes would be based on real value, but if you are over 65 you would only pay the frozen rate... until the property is sold. The buyer would have to catch up the back taxes. Also, an owner could choose to pay more than the minimum frozen rate if they are able in order to make the resale easier.

I think that, perhaps with rare exceptions, the "balloon" tax at resale wouldn't be that much of a burden. Remember, it would only be an amount over and above the frozen rate.

Here in Atlanta, a house that is $300,000 might have property taxes of $1500 per year. If I turned 65 this year and my taxes were frozen, but my property value doubled suddenly, my tax might be $3000 per year. So 10 years from now, there would be a $15,000 tax due. But on what would then be a $600,000 piece of property, this would not necessarily be a deal-breaker, especially if a family was just trying to liquidate the property.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dh1760 Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Why should the new owner be penalized for the 'frozen years"?
I was in agreement with your proposal until you mentioned the balloon tax payment. Your property tax on a $300k home in Atlanta may be $1500, but my property tax (in Nassau County, NY) on the same home would be 3 times that amount (the property/school tax on my $500k home is close to $8000 per year). Using your example (value doubling after 10 years), the balloon here would be closer to $50,000 ... not such an insignificant amount.

I'd modify your proposal to completely write off the above-frozen portion of the property tax, and simply have the new (presumably younger than 65) owner start paying taxes at the fair-market assessed rate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. The problem is that government needs a certain amount of money to operate.
Almost all public school funding comes from property taxes. We have to be careful about just eliminating major revenue streams for the government. Especially, in this case, with a surge in retirements looming.

While $50,000 on a $1 million home may not be insignificant, if values are increasing fast enough to cause the problem in the first place, it's still likely a good investment for somebody. And I would anticipate banks structuring new types of loans so you pay reduced interest on the tax portion, or maybe mortgage companies would include set-aside accounts with new mortgages so that there was money for the taxes down the road.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. But as a potential home buyer, I would not want to take on that add'l amt
and look elsewhere. These people will be stuck in these homes or their families will be stuck with them in estate and not be able to sell.

I love your tax rates, y'all. Here in our little burg in WI, we pay $3K a year in property taxes on a $155,000 home. I like yours better. Of course, we couldn't sell it for that in this market, but since we just put a new roof on it, the assessed "value" shot to $165,000 this year. Yeah, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. yes but keep in mind that this problem only occurs in areas where
property values are increasing fast enough to make the tax bill part of their costs unaffordable for some residents. Also consider that we are primarily trying to solve the problem of fixed income and retired people being forced out of their homes. In most cases, the house will already be paid off, so there is a lot of flexibility in the asking price.

1. The current resident isn't forced out due to tax increases.
2. The government still gets funded.
3. In the vast majority of cases, the house itself is paid for, so at sale there is plenty of flexibility in sell price.
4. Would probably also serve to stabilize the real estate market a little bit. A house with an outstanding tax burden would automatically reduce it's value by a similar amount. It would end up a lot like a reverse mortgage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Actually, your idea would be more palatable if at sale the backlog is paid by the owner.
The owner is probably either leaving to go into a nursing home (where the remainder of the house value would be used for care) or has died, in which case the backlog of taxes would decrease the value of the estate. Otherwise, if the owner is selling in order to move into smaller or cheaper housing, it's still the same idea -- use the proceeds to pay the tax backlog first.

Homestead exemptions are also a good thing if they offer protection from having the house taken solely for back taxes. Some states honor homestead exemptions for the poor regardless of age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #36
66. That would be OK too.
The government still gets their operating funds, just a little delayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
77. Where do you get that "only occurs" part
My property taxes have skyrocketed because the town I live in is surrounded by a rapidly growing ring of new developments filled with young families with children who require an expansion of the school system.

Those of us who own houses in the town -- mostly older, with grown children and modest incomes -- aren't particularly happy about being taxed to pay for the education of other people's children at rates well beyond what we and other homeowners of 10-20 years ago were paying for our own kids. But there isn't much we can do about it.

For most people, their home is the most valuable thing they own, something they plan to either use to finance their retirement or leave as the major portion of their inheritance for their children. Do you really think there's "plenty of flexibility" in the sales price of a house that somebody is depending on to get them into a retirement community? Or that not being able to leave anything of value to your children doesn't matter because they shouldn't have been counting on it anyway?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #77
82. This plan is designed to solve the problem of those on fixed incomes, often seniors,
being forced to sell their home because they can't afford the taxes. If you are not on a fixed income, or if you are still pre-retirement age, you are likely still in a position to sell your house and move somewhere more affordable. Hopefully your property taxes, like most everywhere else, are tied to the value of your house, so you should do quite well if your taxes are going up dramatically.
It is a rare plan that can accommodate all situations and all people with a simple stroke, and other pieces can be added to fill in where necessary. But if your particular problem is that you couldn't sell your house anyway because of the high taxes in your area, then that has nothing to do with this plan. You may need some new county administrators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
65. That's what was done in Kerrville,TX last year or earlier this year...
can't remember exactly, but the housing boom here was skyrocketing property taxes and hitting the older community too hard in the pocketbook.....especially, the ones on fixed income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. Hey .Town Supervisor Paul Feiner. , you could waive her taxes, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shain from kane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. But... but... but, then how would he get paid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. I understand that Retired Doctors and Attorneys can make $7 / HR
just think what a town planner could make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
85. Or the retired teachers
Come hell or high water, they demand their thirty pieces of silver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
20. Maybe they could clean bedpans to pay for their meds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. Isn't capitalism (greed) great?
Leave no seniors behind!

Suck them dry until they die!

Work work work no retirement for you!

Has Obama or Hillary speak up on this yet?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. They probably won't. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Uh, it isn't a corporation doing this, it is local government.
How could this be tied to capitalism? If anything it is local government that has grown too large for its tax base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Your Corporate Capitalist Masters' employees
the pukes and "conservative" Dems CREATED THE PROBLEM...

The town "fathers" are all "capitalist" drones...

That's how they're related...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. No, overspending by local government created the problem.
But I thank you for your incoherent rant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. No one dare to say no to new spending
No one stand up and say we should reduce the budget for next year. Very unpopular inside local governments...Everyone vote yes to expand...

Save and conserve are no longer virtues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #49
69. Which schools should they close?
Which roads should they allow to be pockmarked?

Which libraries should be shut?

Which houses should be allowed to burn down?

Which additional crimes should be allowed to be committed without sufficient response?

Taxing the rich and the corporations their fair share for their use of the commons to acquire their profits are no longer virtues...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #42
67. Over spending by local government
because the pukes and "conservative" Dems have allowed corporations and the rich to avoid paying their fair share any more.

Follow the money. Follow the power.

But I thank you for your shallow analysis of the situation...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #67
83. So, when you looked at Westchester counties budget you didn't see some fat?
http://www.westchestergov.com/pdfs/BUDGET_2008ProposedOperating_sectionB.pdf

It is my understanding that property taxes are based on the assessed value of a property. Should a person with a net worth of 1,000,000 living in a 500,000 dollar house be taxed differently (property tax wise) as someone with no net worth & living in a 500,000 dollar house? Why should a persons financial position matter when taxing their property?

As far as corporations, sometimes county governments will offer tax breaks for businesses in order to retain them. It is part of the counties economic development efforts. Give a tax break to one large employer & they attract other businesses. More people work & live in the community which stimulates the economy.

Do you have any evidence that "the rich" are getting special treatment regarding their property taxes in Westchester county, New York? Not only would I like to see your evidence, I am sure the people of Westchester county would like a peek.

Shallow is blaming EVERYTHING on the rich & corporate America. Is that sort of like the "easy" button in your world?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ckramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Local government didn't make the housing price go up like crazy
the past 10 years, did it?

Stock market bubble, housing bubble, pure capitalistic phenomena.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
58. But local government DOES formulate a "budget".
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 01:49 PM by Wcross
They set tax assessments & tax rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #35
52. The rise in taxes is directly attributable to the increase in housing
valuations, created by the insane housing bubble - which is now bursting, leaving homes assessed far beyond their actual value. The taxes are assessed on the inflated price, which is a price that homeowners cannot ever see on resale.

All because of real estate speculation, which is capitalism in its purest form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #52
61. Who determines assessments and tax rates? Local government.
If their tax revenue doubles isn't it their duty to lower the tax rate? Westchester county government decided to find a place to spend the added revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
51. Greed Good, Greed Good....
protect "my precious"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #51
63. I don't think greed has a place in public service.
The local government is overtaxing its citizens. Seeing as I am not a resident I can not do anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. overtaxed....lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #73
81. LOL? You feel that property taxes are fair in New York?
I have a friend who lives in Rochester, he pays 2500 a year on a 35,000 house in a bad part of town. 7% of the homes value every year. Lets not forget the state income tax, the sales tax & other assorted taxes. Maybe if they didn't tax the crap out of people New York wouldn't be losing residents.

Laugh all you want, the tax situation in New York is hurting its citizens.

Westchester county ranked #1 in property tax rates in the entire United States.
http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/03/pf/property_taxes/index.htm

I am going to take a wild guess that you do not pay property taxes. It makes it easier to laugh at those who do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
23. Workhouses and poor farms!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CONN Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
24. Should we try Workhouses (as in Oliver Twist)
Of course the British realized they didn't solve anything and abolished them in the 20th century. No property tax either. They were replaced by a social welfare that provides dignity in old age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
25. My state has a homestead exemption for seniors
If you're 64 or older or totally and permanently disabled you can get an exemption from property taxes on the first $20,000 of assessed valuation on a personal residence. This applies to owner-occupied property. Sounds like chickenfeed but the assessed value is always lower than the appraised value, often dramatically so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #25
89. DC provides a 45K exemption to ALL homeowners...
in any "owner occupied" residence for any DC resident and further discounts for seniors. Additionally, even with the insane (and totally bogus bank and investor driven) jump in property values, tax increases are limited to no more than 10%/year until a property changes hands.

If anything, the program is abused by those who have homes and apartments for work/convenience and live elsewhere.

I would imagine a quick list at corporate/political/lobbyist names would reveal a huge additional source of revenue, but the department is currently in disarray due to massive embezzlement. Hey, it's DC. What did you expect?

"DC - it's like living in a third world country without the amenities."

Seriously, it is much better than it was even ten years ago, but I miss being able to safely walk outside after dark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. For every 76-year-old who is fit and ready to work
there are plenty on meds, in pain, or with other ailments or family situations that would preclude them from beng out there in the salt mine. Jeez, these people worked hard all their lives. Leave them the hell alone. If property taxes are a burden for a low income senior, lower the tax or create an exemption.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerously Amused Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
33. But... wait. Couldn't we just increase taxes on the filthy rich instead?



Ba ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaaa!


Just kidding.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
downindixie Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
34. Retired Doctors and lawyers make
enought money that they probably don't have to worry about paying property taxes! I'm disabled with COPD,I don't have the breath to do anything physical!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
39. I hope that lots of their victims develop dementia on the job.
So now these retired people will be taking the entry level jobs that young people need. The whole scheme is absurd. The property tozes in this town are way out of bounds with what people earn for work. If you work 40 hours a week for 50 weeks, you work about 2000 hours a year, and you pay property taxes of $12,000, you are paying $6 an hour in property taxes.

Seniors move and think relatively slowly. Oh, how jolly!!! Who in the world ever thought this cruel joke up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
41. Sickening.
Such rules are put in place by lawyers, economists and the like.

If the rules had been made by bricklayers, carpenters and such, they would be quite different.

Ever tried to carry 80 pounds of lumber on tour shoulder while climbing up a ladder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmosh42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
43. Welcome to the third world!
Most civilized nations try to keep their seniors in their homes when they reach old age. Not US! Good chance the property will be gone for medical bills or taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. Thanks to "value voters" that's what we got now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GMFORD Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
44. Must rant about this!
By the time a person reaches retirement age they have given their entire adult lives to society. They have spent nearly 50 years adding to the GDP, contributing to the workforce, paying taxes, etc. Their reward is supposed to be a few secure years before they die. But NO, the GOP is not content with importing cheap labor from mexico, exporting manufacturing to other countries where labor is cheap, now they want to take the retirement out of 'retirement' and use seniors for cheap labor.

When I retire I plan to pursue those hobbies I have never had time for, maybe take a few classes in subjects I like instead of those I took to advance my career. Working as a greeter at 'The Wal-Mart' for minimum wage to pay my property taxes is not in the plan -- I wouldn't last anyway because the job itself would make me less than friendly.

I don't have a solution in mind (other than forgiving property taxes for those on SS) but someone had better come up with something soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sk8rrobert2 Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
45. As put by Adam Sandler in Big Daddy "HORSE SHIT"
working elderly people until they die its disgusting. Where's my pen and paper someone's getting a nasty letter over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
46. i think this is just fabulous!
i live in southern new mexico. i have seen my property taxes triple in 17 years. i have also seen seniors die after retiring...almost immediately after retiring. not only will this keep seniors in their homes, but provide them with something useful to do with themselves. IMO, this is long overdue. why not make use of skills that seniors have instead of just allowing them to waste away until they die? is death ALL i have to look forward to? i sure hope not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GMFORD Donating Member (202 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #46
59. Waste away?
You think that working for minimum wage is not wasting away? What about that novel he/she may have been waiting to write? What about the train trip around the country? What about that oil painting class there was never time for? My great aunt grew Irises when she retired and even created new ones that won awards...was that wasting away? My father built a house with his own hands after 50 years as a chemical engineer when he retired -- he was in the best physical shape he had ever been in after he was done.

I respectfully disagree with you on this topic. Or as one of my best friends would say 'I disagree with what you say but I'll defend to the death my right to beat you about the head and shoulders' (kidding)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #59
87. where does it say that being kicked out on the street for non-payment of
property taxes is a good thing? the more you pay an elderly person, once you reach a certain limit, they start taking away your social security. guess in your playbook, that is a good thing. think of it this way, you can literally get their property for a steal. why let them pay it off when you can just wait for them to get thrown out & then take their property. hmmph! why didn't i think of that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #46
74. Fabulous?
Hardly.

It is sickening!:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpeale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #74
86. no, sickening is putting the elderly out on the street
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
48. Westchester County, New York. Figures.
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 01:35 PM by trogdor
While I'm generally sympathetic to low-income seniors who have to pay ridiculous property taxes in states like New York, get pushed out of their homes because of tax arrears, etc., this is WESTCHESTER COUNTY, people! That four-bedroom house in Westchester County is probably worth close to a million dollars, like this house in nearby White Plains (http://www.alexanderrallis.com/bin/web/real_estate?acnt=AR17053&action=ACTIVATE_FRAMES&button=HOME_SEARCH). Ask Sen. Clinton how much she paid for her house. I say she can - and should - cash out (lots of people from New York City would line up for the chance to hand over a million bucks for the place) and move like most of her neighbors probably already have.

Edit: The lady says she took out a reverse mortgage to pay her property taxes. Bad move. She should move further Upstate (like the Utica/Rome area, where houses are cheap) and pay her taxes with the money she'd still have in the bank. Guaranteed, she wouldn't outlive that big a pile of cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
53. Sick....
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 01:48 PM by fascisthunter
And some wealthy bitch about paying taxes.

Let's see... we pay taxes, most of which goes to subsidizing corporate welfare, profiting the military industrial complex and paying private companies three fold of what social programs used to cost us. Sounds like institutionalized slavery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
55. You work until you die, and you will remain poor every step of the way
Welcome to the "ownership society"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
57. First that's under the minimum wage for our state, how could these peopl
make so little in that state.

Second, that's not a part time job, that's a full time at that rate plus taxes. They would have to work all year, likely still won't clear 12k, and they wouldn't be able to spend a dime of their wages on anything else besides property taxes.

This is forcing the seniors into labor where all the money goes to the gov and state.

It's very wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
60. A lot of those jobs are not going to be anything
an elderly person can do due to physical constraints. More Bush-like fantasy and short-sightedness from our government officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brer cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
62. I'm getting there
Brer Cat's sister here...I am getting there. I am an RN...63 years old. I have worked since I was 15, have paid property taxes for over 30 years. Maybe I will feel like helping other folks when I retire in two years...but maybe not. My house is tiny...tax me accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
64. HEY
That would eliminate the illigel alien worker. Just take all of us old geezers and make, er, I mean LET us work for $7.00 an hour doing jobs that no one else wants to do. What a bunch of ass-holes.

I've heard things like "freezing tax rate" balloon tax payment and let the buyer make up back taxes. What kind of horse-shit is that? Governments need money to run but they need to live within a budget like everyone else. This idea of making old people work to pay taxes is so full of shit that only neocon ass-holes could possible find some reedeming quality in that idea.
So to you neocon ass-holes. FUCK YOU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrspeeker Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
68. 7 dollars and hour part time ROFL are you fucking joking with me
so after 4 hours minus taxes of course, they will have earned 28 dollars about $125 a week, if you can pay off your bills and save your house with this amount of money your a genius!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #68
78. The part time is just so they don't get benefits. I'm sure it means 39 hours a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
71. Paul Feiner, you first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
72. RAISE THE FICA TAX LIMIT
ANYTHING TO NOT TAX THE RICH!!! FUCK!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #72
84. Agree, absolutely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChazII Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
75. As other have stated
this is outrageous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
76. In my mom's town
they let the amount of the property taxes be off set by the cost of medications. She doesn't have to pay property taxes because the cost of her medication co-pays equals out to the cost of her property taxes in a year. This seems like a very humane way to treat Seniors, trying to stay in a home, they have worked their whole life to pay-off. Maybe it should have a Federal mandate? Could it be an election platform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #76
79. Since "compassionate" conservatives have that little blank spot
where they can't actually feel for others, no it won't work for an election platform.

You have to tell them something will be taken away from them right now, not when they're old for them to care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
80. I think the plan is to get rid of the seniors and take their homes - killing them by making them
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 05:11 PM by superconnected
work 20 yo's jobs.

They can starve to death on the low salary if they don't die by the physical labor. First the bush admin tried to take away their perscription drugs and medicare it may have been to take their homes. Now the plan is to work them to death with a pay they can't keep their home on. You can tell it's a republican spin by the term "let" them have jobs which is going to mean "make" them have jobs and get rid of other aid. Bet the homes get sold back to the big reality companies in dirt cheap gov foreclosures. It does sound like the current mass murdering juntas modis operandi -kill people to take their assets. But why assume they'd do to us like they would iraq...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
88. Cmon Granny! It just shouldn't take you that long to mow my yard!
Hurry it up or I give Speedy McOldperson the job when he gets that plastic hip in.

Somebody hum God Bless America, I'm feeling patriotic. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC