Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Condemns Bhutto Attack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:27 AM
Original message
White House Condemns Bhutto Attack
Source: ABC NEWS Dec. 27, 2007

White House Condemns Bhutto Attack
Former Prime Minister of Pakistan was a Key Ally to the U.S. Government

ABC NEWS Dec. 27, 2007

Share The White House has released a brief statement on the death of former Prime Minister of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto, saying "We condemn the acts of violence which took place today in Pakistan."

President Bush is set to make a statement about the situation at 11 a.m. ET. He was informed of the attack and Bhutto's death this morning.

According to White House spokesman Scott Stanzel, "The President has been informed about the situation in Pakistan. He was told about it this morning during his regular briefing, which began at 7:30 Central Time."

--snip--

ABC News' Jonathan Karl visited Islamabad earlier this year with Vice President Dick Cheney. On that trip, senior officials spoke about their fears that Pakistan could turn to what one official called "the dark side." Bhutto's assassination will not likely help in avoiding that turn.


Read more: http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/story?id=4056107&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hitler condemns those who shot prisoners "while trying to escape"
One hand condemns the other.

This is the handiwork of Busharraf and his Bushies in the ISI, both friends of al-Qaeda.

Bhutto might have actually assisted in rooting out al-Qaeda from the tribal areas, and this could not be permitted.

That's my take on it. There are probably many other reaqsons we don't know about, but the Bushies dared not allow Bhutto to regain control of the nation and root out those whom are under Bushie Protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. they probably voted and 'condenm' won over 'approve'
by a vote of 6 to 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Hmmm, the Dark Side. My speciality." - Commander AWOL
"You were maybe expecting something else when you allowed a republicon occultist to steal the White House and say not a word at all about his occult Skull & Boner cabal? Smirk."

- Commander AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Beyond the neocon's scope
This isn't within the neocons scope... they only see it as "destablizing". They are secretly happy because Bhutto won't threaten Musharov's power structure. They won't mention this. There will be great show crying... but they will continue to support Musharov regardless of events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dantyrant Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. No love lost between the neocons and Musharaff n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Chimpy probably thinks they mean Popeye's nemesis...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shayes51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Interesting that I knew about it before Bush did, and BTW,
did any of you think he looked a bit hung over this morning in his remark from Crawford?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bush called it a "cowardly act"
Was he intentionally pointing the finger at himself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. He has a way of telling the truth inadvertently.
For example, when he really gets rolling in his state of the union speeches, he's usually jabbbering about how scary and powerful the "terrorists" are, i.e. praising his own evil self.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. In Bush's ABC interview he said Musharaff had advanced democracy
when clearly Musharaff had done the exact opposite. I'm afraid for the Pakistani people, and for Americans, who suffer from the same dictatorial leadership as Pakistan, cowardly as it is. There was no way Musharaff was going to give up his control, any more than the Bushies will relinquish theirs in the coming "election."

http://youtube.com/watch?v=t1xYN8yBQy4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bush's statement will 1) be an impotent assessment of the situation and
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 11:44 AM by Feles Mala
2) make some sort of dumb ass allusion to this peaceful time of year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubicleGuy Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. As expected, I noticed...
... that he made no statements along the lines of "there should be an investigation so that the people responsible for the attack would be discovered and punished"; I assume that it was because he would have been unable to keep a straight face, in light of all of the coverups that can be put at the feet of his administration in our own government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. You guys may have driven this rare species away. Hardly a soul
in this country can defend Bush and you had him right where you could dissect him by q and a - we could have had a profile of rarity and instead we plucked off his legs and ears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. and the saddest thing...
I missed it....:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. They don't even get the IRONY and HYPOCRISY...
but yet Hugo is somehow a "dictator" and bush is "legitimate"...

simply astounding...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC