Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Hillary) Clinton says she would tear up blank check for war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:33 PM
Original message
(Hillary) Clinton says she would tear up blank check for war
Source: desmoines register

Lawton, Ia. — Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton would let Iraqi leaders know she’s torn up the “blank check” and that the war-torn country must guide its own future, she said this morning.

“The Iraqis have not done what they had to do. So when I am president, the Iraqis will know they don’t any longer have a blank check from George Bush. I’ve torn that up. They’ve got to take responsibility to solve their own problems,” Clinton told an audience of about 300 at a school in Lawton.

She added: “We will help them. We will push them. We will try to give them the support they need to do it, but they are the only ones who can determine their future.”

Clinton, a Democrat who represents New York in the U.S. Senate, repeated her vow that she would ask her security advisers “on day one” for a plan for the safe and orderly withdrawal of the troops in Iraq.

“I’m committed to starting within 60 days,” Clinton said. “I think we can get out one to two brigades a month.”

Read more: http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071227/NEWS/71227011/1001/NEWS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Check Returned for Insufficient Funds
No big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. blame it on the iraqis? bullshit. its noones fault but ours.
the us has directly created the situation as it stands. there is no other power that can stand against it or be blamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. Hey!
that's her "out". She has to blame someone for her vote! Din't you know the Iraqis wanted her to vote the way she did. Now that she helped get *'s war on, the Iraqis are ungrateful.

It's the Iraqis fault that our government invaded their country, annihilated their infrastructure, killed hundreds of thousands of their fellow citizens and destroyed their economy.

And now they won't standup and run their government?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. If she tore up the check why was hasn't she repealed the IWR?
She is on the record saying that would be repealed October 2007?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Only if elected, otherwise look elsewhere if one wants troops home
Don't dare lift a finger to do anything now. Keep the guys in harm's way, it is good for campaign slogans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm always cautious when I hear the "no more blank check" rhetoric. Maybe she needs new buzz words.
Pelosi vows no 'blank check' on Iraq funds
Wants Bush to justify use of additional troops

By Rick Klein, Globe Staff | January 8, 2007



http://boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2007/01/08/pelosi_vows_no_blank_check_on_iraq_funds/

WASHINGTON -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said yesterday that Democrats would not give President Bush a "blank check" to continue the war in Iraq, and suggested that Democratic leaders may seek to deny the administration funding to send more troops to Iraq.

Pelosi, a California Democrat, repeatedly rejected suggestions that Democrats would cut off funding for the war, a step being urged by many liberal activists. But if the president wants a surge in US troops in Iraq -- a step he is expected to outline this week -- Democrats might move to stop him from using any new funds for that purpose, she said.

"If the president chooses to escalate the war, in his budget request we want to see a distinction between what is there to support the troops who are there now," Pelosi said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

"The American people and the Congress support those troops," she added. "But if the president wants to add to this mission, he is going to have to justify it. And this is new for him, because up until now the Republican Congress has given him a blank check with no oversight, no standards, no conditions."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kashka-Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Not done what they're supposed to do?" What exactly are they "supposed to do"?
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 01:44 PM by Kashka-Kat
Agree to oil laws as desired by multinational corps? Agree to US occupation for the next 50 yrs (until said oil wells are depleted)? Agree to 14 permanent US military bases on their soil?

What exactly are they "supposed to do"? Woman speak with forked tongue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. they were supposed to work on a political end to his war.
I cannot get over the memory loss here on DU!

Time and again, everyone said they only need a few more months to get their political house in order and than the troops can leave. But they did nothing politically but take two months off cause it was hot outside (of course our troops did not get two months off).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Somehow I suspect the Iraqi's haven't been getting the lion's share of that blank check.
Call it a hunch.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sentelle Donating Member (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why'd she vote for the blank check
if all she's gonna do is tear it up when/if she becomes president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. If she hadn't voted to give * the
blank check in the first place, she couldn't promise to tear it up. It's pretty simple really--vote to continue the war to avoid being attacked as a 'soft on defense' and pledge to end the war to avoid being attacked as pro-war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saskatoon Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Hillary
Hillary is full of shit, she talks as the wind blows. She is a phony!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Shouldn't Hillary be saying that to Halliburton, Blackwater -- ?
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 02:02 PM by defendandprotect
How about addressing a return of women's rights in Iraq -- ?
Separation of Church & Sate --- ?
Ending corruption of the war machine --- ?
Actually rebuilding the infastructure that we bombed out from under Iraqis years ago--?

This is meaningless chatter ---


AND, it is HRC votes which took us to this horrid place we're at now ---
and her votes to refund --- !!!

Shallow, dishonest remarks ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brrrp Donating Member (124 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Every once in a while, she has to "make nice" to the left. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Note to Hillrary Camp:
We're on to you, hon. Been on to you for quite sometime. Good luck in winning that election without us (progressives).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. which election?
primary or general?

cuz this progressive will vote for her in the general - the alternative is what? huckabee?

and so goes the course of our great democracy - the choice between 5 & 6 on a scale of 1 to 10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. bwahaha.
I love the absolutist mindset. It's richly amusing- no matter who engages in it; you or your kindred spirit, bushie.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Ok, that last line didn't even make any sense.
Are you saying Bush likes progressives? :crazy: And how can you possibly know my mindset? I don't recall us ever spending time together. How absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. I am a Progressive, and I've not a Democrat
Never have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. i said IN THE GENERAL
Edited on Fri Dec-28-07 05:12 PM by maxsolomon
in the absence of a progressive choice (kucinich will not be the democratic nominee, sorry to break it to you), does a progressive prefer to be ruled by hillary or huckabee?

in Washington State, you have to choose a party to vote in the primary. so i did. that's the depth of my party membership. would you prefer to have no say whatsoever in the primaries because you don't want to be a "democrat"?

yet you post on DemocraticUnderground...




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. "Ruled"?
You know, because who WOULDN'T be overjoyed with those terms??

Has she won anything yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. well, yes.
that's the dilemma, isn't it?

i've held my nose & voted for the democrat in every presidential election since i could vote.

someone please point out how NOT voting for hillary in the general would stop the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Well, by all means, if our party is so freak-spankity confident that any one of our candidates
. . . can defeat the Republican candidate, then there shouldn't be any problem, should there?

You know, unless there's some lingering ambivelance and DOUBT about a certain one.

In which case, we'd better choose WISELY in our primaries. You think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. oh she'll tear it up, just not til 2013, maybe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. The fact is that she handed over a blank check to Bush
and gave him permission to cash it, co signed by her. Now she is trying to say she renegs on it? This is typical Hillary Clinton. Typical. I have had enough of this bait and switch politics from Bush and from the
Clintons. We have reached 3,900 American troops dead and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi innocent human beings that she voted to give a death penalty to on lies,and now she says she would withdraw the check? Keep it up Hillary. You will be as hated as George Bush is and it is your fault for voting for it and refusing to recognize your vote was wrong.
This is just disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. Almost as disgusting as Bill Clinton's lie, saying he was against the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. You have done exactly the opposite, Hillary
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 02:46 PM by nebula
you handed him the blank check in the first place and you continue to do so.

your words and empty promises are utterly worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. You bet
A lot of them did that

Russ (My Senator) didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. You are right
More empty words
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Iraqis Have no Legitimate Power in Their Own Country
Edited on Thu Dec-27-07 03:00 PM by fascisthunter
WTF is wrong with her?!?!?!?! Are folks in DC living in a bubble of BS or what?

PS - WTF is wrong with Hartmann? What does he possibly see in her. I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
20. And replace it with an American Depressed card
But at least she'll get Frequent Liar points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ya, but is she gonna tell this to the war hawks over here?
Lawton, Ia. — Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton would let Iraqi leaders know she’s torn up the “blank check” and that the war-torn

I think this blank check goes directly into offshore accounts of Merkan companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemKR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. revoke IWR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. Then why has she continued to issue blank checks concerning the war?
Hell, I think that there is only one war funding bill that she hasn't voted for, so why the hell aren't her actions matching her words?

Oh, yeah, she's trying to pander to the anti-war left while remaining a committed war monger:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
29. The blank check she signed?
or a different one :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-27-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. Bookmarked, because she is talking so much SHIT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-28-07 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
32. Ah, so she admits that a blank check has been given!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Countdown_3_2_1 Donating Member (778 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
40. Talk is cheap. DO SOMETHING NOW!!!
This chick is a senator. I have seen her cave in too many times.

--> Am I really expected to trust her enough to believe that "if elected," she will end the war? She has the power to do that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-29-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
41. Sure she'll steal the oil....
no doubt... No more Clintons in the WH... Its time for real change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC