EU observers said the country's election fell short of international standards.
"They were marred by a lack of transparency in the processing and tallying of presidential results, which raises concerns about the accuracy of the final results," the EU team said in a statement.
According to the EU, in at least two constituencies - Molo and Kieni - the results that were announced did not reflect the number of votes cast.
EU observers say they heard the voting figures being announced in Molo itself, but when the same results were announced again in Nairobi, the number of votes for Mr Kibaki was significantly higher - by 25,000.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/7166590.stmThat 25,000 was a 50% increase in the Kibaki 'vote' - we're not talking chicken feed:
The European Union chief election observer, Mr Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, said the ECK had not succeeded in establishing the credibility of the tallying process to the satisfaction of all parties and candidates in the presidential race.
"The result for the Molo constituency, for example, was announced in the presence of EU observers at the constituency tally centre as 50,145 votes for President Kibaki, while the ECK declared the result for the President to be 75,261 votes," he said.
"Because of this and other observed irregularities, some doubt remains as to the accuracy of the result of the presidential election as announced today," he said in a statement.
http://allafrica.com/stories/200712310011.html