Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Navy tells Bush Iran incident 'serious'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 01:53 AM
Original message
Navy tells Bush Iran incident 'serious'
Source: TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent

2 minutes ago

MANAMA, Bahrain - A naval commander told President Bush on Sunday that he is taking the recent confrontation between Iranian and U.S. Navy forces in the Persian Gulf "deadly seriously."
ADVERTISEMENT

White House press secretary Dana Perino said Bush did not raise the showdown in the Hormuz Strait when he spoke with U.S. Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff, commander of the U.S. 5th Fleet, which patrols the Gulf. But Perino said Cosgriff told the president that he took it very seriously when an Iranian fleet of high-speed boats charged at and threatened to blow up a three-ship U.S. Navy convoy passing near Iranian waters.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080113/ap_on_re_mi_ea/bush_mideast




Bush want this hard on so bad again ignoring the intelligence reports....Ill be GWB can play drums pretty good...he seems to be using every resource to beat this one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wundermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. background on U.S. Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 02:03 AM by vmaus


Vice Admiral Kevin J. Cosgriff
Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command
Commander, U.S. 5th Fleet
Commander, Combined Maritime Forces
Vice Admiral Kevin J. Cosgriff

Vice Admiral Kevin J. Cosgriff graduated from the U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, N.Y., and began active duty with the Navy directly thereafter. He was among the first to receive a Master of Science in Strategic Intelligence from the Defense Intelligence College. He also earned the Naval War College Foundation Award for Outstanding Performance. He is an alumnus of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI Program...

more...

Updated: 6 August 2007

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/bios/navybio.asp?bioID=76
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wundermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Cheney met with Vice Adm. Cosgriff on May 11, 2007
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 02:04 AM by vmaus

May 13, 2007

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Release #108-07

Contact Public Affairs
Vice Adm. Cosgriff Briefs Cheney aboard Stennis

From U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/U.S. 5th Fleet Public Affairs

USS JOHN C. STENNIS, At Sea – Vice Adm. Kevin J. Cosgriff, commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) and commander, U.S. 5th Fleet briefed Vice President Dick Cheney on U.S. and coalition operations in the Middle East May 11 during the vice president’s visit aboard the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74), underway in the Arabian Gulf.

Vice President Cheney is currently on a tour of the Middle East to meet with Arab leaders and U.S. servicemen and women.

“You’re doing all that we ask of you, and you’re doing it with skill and with honor,” Cheney told the crew of the Stennis. “With two carrier strike groups in the Gulf, we’re sending clear messages to friends and adversaries alike. We’ll keep the sea lanes open. We’ll stand with our friends in opposing extremism and strategic threats. We'll disrupt attacks on our own forces. We'll continue bringing relief to those who suffer, and delivering justice to the enemies of freedom. And we'll stand with others to prevent Iran from gaining nuclear weapons and dominating this region.”

Cosgriff outlined the challenges and opportunities facing maritime forces in the Middle East.

“I especially wanted the highlight the important contribution that the maritime coalition is making in the region,” Cosgriff said...

more...

http://www.cusnc.navy.mil/articles/2007/108.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cullen2382 Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Wait a minute...
I was listening to Democracy Now the other day and thought this whole threat had been exposed as a fraud.

They said the commander of the fifth fleet said they had never felt threatened. The Iranians released their recordings of the communications between them and our ships and it was nothing like what the Pentagon released.

They were speculating that the Pentagon spliced the tape. Have I missed something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Doesn't he mean "SERIES!!1!"?
THIS IS H--well you know the rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't that poor English? Deadly seriously?
shouldn't it be dead seriously, or deadly serious?

The Navy commanders, sheesh, I tell you. Or did President NCLB say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. It looks OK to me
He's taking it seriously (describing a verb needs an adverb). How seriously? Deadly seriously (describing an adverb needs another adverb). He could have said 'completely seriously' instead. "Complete seriously" or "taking it completely serious" would both sounds very wrong. It's just that in informal English, "dead serious" has become common. 'Deadly' is more correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. just sounds clunky, like something * would say = mangulation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7 of 11 Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yeah yea yeah
Next thing you know Bush will be telling us that Iranian boats are building weapons of mass destruction. Been there, Done that Mr "President"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hey, if they aren't building nukes, bomb them for their jetski attack on aircraftcarriers
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 04:01 AM by niceypoo
This is right up there with Saddam's elite "can hit anywhere in America in 45 minutes" balsa wood and duct tape weed eater powered drone squadron
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. AAH Yes --------the Jet ski attack
Really provocative
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Jet skis of death
Speedboats of Mass Destruction? It needs a catchy slogan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. LOL....
Didn't the Navy have a war game of the similar situation many years ago, and Rumsfailed dismissed it as nonsense.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Because his team lost the Millennium Challenge 02
Retired Lt. Gen. Paul K. Van Riper demonstrated the vulnerability of our navy in the gulf region.

Interesting, the NY Times dug up and polished the story after the latest fiasco:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/12/washington/12navy.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is HUGH!!! Am SERIES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. GULF OF TONKIN, GULF OF TONKIN
GULF OF TONKIN
GULF OF TONKIN
GULF OF TONKIN
GULF OF TONKIN
GULF OF TONKIN
GULF OF TONKIN
GULF OF TONKIN
GULF OF TONKIN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. last week that the NSA released the report confirming the American people were tricked into going to
Remember, it was just last week that the NSA released the report confirming the American people were tricked into going to war with Vietnam by falsifying and attack on our warships in the Gulf of Tonkin.

Vietnam, Iraq, Iran are simply about war for profit - killing and maiming people to make money - that's all.

From: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hzFIeNFkO1z6p7PHHwx5k_ig11-Q

"Report reveals Vietnam War hoaxes, faked attacks

5 days ago

WASHINGTON (AFP) — ...according to declassified information that also confirmed US officials faked an incident to escalate the war.

The report was released by the National Security Agency, ... in response to a "mandatory declassification" request, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) said Monday.

...
But he said that probably the "most historically significant feature" of the declassified report was the retelling of the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident.

That was a reported North Vietnamese attack on American destroyers that helped lead to president Lyndon Johnson's sharp escalation of American forces in Vietnam.

The author of the report "demonstrates that not only is it not true, as (then US) secretary of defense Robert McNamara told Congress,... but that to the contrary, a review of the classified signals intelligence proves that 'no attack happened that night,'" FAS said in a statement.

"What this study demonstrated is that the available intelligence shows that there was no attack. It's a dramatic reversal of the historical record," Aftergood said.

"There were previous indications of this but this is the first time we have seen the complete study," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good doggie, have a biscuit. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. did the Yahoo-AP article disappear?
The link now goes to "Bush: Iran threatens global security"

I hate when they do that.

here's an alternate link:

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=4126900

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. WTF
White House press secretary Dana Perino said Bush did not raise the showdown in the Hormuz Strait when he spoke with U.S. Vice Adm. Kevin Cosgriff, commander of the U.S. 5th Fleet.

Why didn't he?
Wasn't it the DNI guy (Bush terminology) who came into the Oval Office and said, we've gotten some new intel and Bush didn't ask what it was?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC