Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Army to Cut Back Patrols in Baghdad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:33 PM
Original message
U.S. Army to Cut Back Patrols in Baghdad
U.S. Army to Cut Back Patrols in Baghdad
By JIM KRANE, Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD, Iraq - The U.S. Army will cut back on the number of garrisons in Baghdad and conduct fewer armed patrols after the 1st Armored Division hands control of the capital to a fresh Army division and pulls out after a year in the country.

It's all part of the U.S. strategy to turn over responsibility for security to Iraqis at a time when attacks against Americans are dwindling, said Brig. Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, a deputy commander of the 1st Armored Division.

The incoming force, the Army's 1st Cavalry Division, will billet most of its forces outside Baghdad, closing 19 bases in the city as the 1st Armored returns to Germany in April, Scaparrotti said.

"We're inside the city in many operating bases looking out," Scaparrotti said in an interview with The Associated Press. "They will be more on the outside looking in."

The mellower occupation plan is contingent on a smooth handoff that includes hundreds of tasks, the mismanagement of any one of which could bring the troops storming back into Baghdad. They include maintaining good relations with a testy Shiite Muslim slum and introducing incoming troops to the network of Iraqi informers, Scaparrotti said.

(more)

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040116/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_the_handoff&cid=540&ncid=1480
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KissMyAsscroft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess they are tired of getting blown up...


So they are going to just stay in their base while the country continues to crumble.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yeah
this should drastically reduce those casualty lists :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebel_with_a_cause Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Now that Iraqi women have lost their rights
I think this decision to pull back on patrols is way past due.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Everything being done over there is political.
Everything. This nicely reinforces the message that things are getting better. What is doesn't say is that the new troops will be more vulnerable until they get "salty".

But kudos to the Army for better, specialized training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nibbana Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Already Started: Vietnam pacification repeat
You can count on it that, this was the first thing they did after November 03 body count went through the roof..

Why do you think the Iraqi police casualties have increased..

More pacification is the wholesale exchange of all the troops...
Why would you lose all the experienced soldiers at the same time by exchanging them out in this manner?

This defense dept. cares more about * re-election bid than anything going on in Iraq...

This reminds me of a dejavu I once had..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC