Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Annan Asked to Send Team to Iraq on Elections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 02:18 PM
Original message
Annan Asked to Send Team to Iraq on Elections
Annan Asked to Send Team to Iraq on Elections
By Evelyn Leopold

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United States and Iraqi leaders asked the United Nations (news - web sites) Monday to salvage their strategy in Iraq (news - web sites) and send a mission to Baghdad to advise on the feasibility of elections now or suggest a compromise.

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan (news - web sites) said he was considering the proposal but told reporters further discussions were necessary before he could make a decision on sending what he called a "technical" team immediately.

The request came from the Iraqi Governing Council, which took the lead in several hours of meetings with the United Nations and the U.S.-led occupation authorities.

As the meetings began at the United Nations, tens of thousands of Shi'ite Muslims marched in Baghdad to support a demand by Iraq's most revered Shi'ite cleric, Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, for an elected provisional government rather than indirect elections through caucuses, as Washington proposed.

(more)

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040119/ts_nm/iraq_dc&cid=564&ncid=1480
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. If I understand this correctly,
if they have elections and the Shi'ite are in the majority, then it will be possible for them to turn Iraq into a strict Islamic govt, right? Bush won't look too hot.

If the UN is late getting there, or if the elections are put off, then it's the UN's fault as they are recommending that they be delayed, so Bush not meeting his target isn't his fault. (yeah, right) But of course, that means the soldiers are still stuck there...

Anything else I'm missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC