Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Supreme Court takes Missouri death penalty case (killer under age 18)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 11:03 AM
Original message
U.S. Supreme Court takes Missouri death penalty case (killer under age 18)
U.S. Supreme Court takes Missouri death penalty case
By Anne Gearan
Associated Press
01/26/2004

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court, which two years ago abolished executions for the mentally retarded, said Monday it will now consider ending the execution of killers who were under 18 when they committed their crimes.

The court said it will reopen the question of whether executing very young killers violates the Constitution's ban on "cruel and unusual punishment." Currently, states that allow the death penalty may impose it on killers who were 16 or 17 at the time of their crimes.

The court's decision, expected by June, continues the high court's reexamination of who belongs on death row and how the death penalty is carried out.

The court agreed to hear the case of a Missouri man who was 17 when he robbed a woman, wrapped her head in duct tape and threw her off a railroad bridge in 1993. The state Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional to send people to their deaths for killings committed when they were younger than 18.

More at the Saint Louis Post-Dispatch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pegleg Thd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Look for other states to
fast track the executions of others in this situation before the slime-ball supremes puke out their ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Didn't They Already Do This For A Case In Texas?
I remember people like Clarence Thomas, Scalia and Rhenquist had to recuse themselves because the victim was the father of one of their associates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Jan 05th 2025, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC