Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. will wait for report on arms -- New White House position evolving

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 04:39 AM
Original message
U.S. will wait for report on arms -- New White House position evolving
U.S. will wait for report on arms
New White House position evolving
http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/politics/2372324
Copyright 2004 Houston Chronicle News Services


WASHINGTON -- The White House began to back away on Monday from its assertions that Iraq had illegal weapons, saying it now wanted to compare prewar intelligence assessments with what may be actually found there.

The evolving position followed criticism of the intelligence reports about Iraq from the CIA's former chief weapons inspector, David Kay, comments that increased pressure on the CIA and intensified the political debate in Washington over who was responsible for shaping the prewar intelligence that President Bush used to justify toppling Saddam Hussein.

On Monday, White House officials were no longer asserting that stockpiles of banned weapons would eventually be found.

Scott McClellan, the White House spokesman, said en route to an appearance by Bush in Little Rock, Ark., that the administration would wait for the weapons hunting team, the Iraq Survey Group, to complete its work before drawing any conclusions about the quality of the intelligence available.

-------

ummmm...regarding New White House position evolving - should that have been New White House position REVOLVING -- because it's just more spin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annagull Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Operation: blame somebody else
CIA will be the fall guy, question is.. will they go quietly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. The search is on, "who won't blow the whisle?"
Will be the name of the game. Who's pumping up the market?

Kind of like, "Who's on Second"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Piggybacked with Operation: Stall For Time
Nixon did the same thing during Watergate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. Lemme see do I grok this:
Here in the "postwar" period, we're now supposed to see if the "prewar" intelligence was sufficient to warrant the Iraq-Attaq that Maximum Leader told us he just HAD TO HAVE because the intelligence told us that Saddam was going to put 28,000 liters of nerve gas into a remote-controlled drone and fly it over the east coast.

Right.

On a more personal note, bu$h has fucked up the traffic flow in Little Rock worse--and more often--than Clinton EVER did. You couldn't get ON the major east-west freeway across town yesterday around noon, thanks to the extreme measures that have to be taken to insure that the DictatorTot does not come into contact with ordinary people. As if there are any here...

Shit O Goodness,
:crazy:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's a little late in the game, isn't it?
"Sentence first, then trial," said King Boosh in the Looking Glass. If this is the way he runs things (which it obvously is), it's no wonder he ran companies like Arbusto into the ground.

After all, when your only tool is a hammer, everything starts looking like a nail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. CIA being set up to take the fall.
I think the WH will regret blaming them. The CIA is already pissed about how pre-war intelligence was used. They won't go quietly into the night....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
isbister Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush should dust off some of the old arguments
"There's no bigger task than protecting the homeland of our country."

"Nothing he has done has convinced me?I'm confident the Secretary of Defense?that he is the kind of fellow that is willing to forgo weapons of mass destruction, is willing to be a peaceful neighbor, that is?will honor the people?the Iraqi people of all stripes, will?values human life. He hasn't convinced me, nor has he convinced my administration."

Crawford, Texas, Aug. 21, 2002

"There's no doubt in my mind that we should allow the world worst leaders to hold America hostage, to threaten our peace, to threaten our friends and allies with the world's worst weapons."

South Bend, Ind., Sept. 5, 2002

"There's an old saying in Tennessee?I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee?that says, fool me once, shame on?shame on you. Fool me?you can't get fooled again."

Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002

"People say, how can I help on this war against terror? How can I fight evil? You can do so by mentoring a child; by going into a shut-in's house and say I love you."?

Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lets view the evolution of the spin...
First we had

Weapons of Mass Destruction



Then we had,

Weapons of Mass Destruction Programs



Next came,

Weapons of Mass Destruction Program Activities



Now we have,

Weapons of Mass Destruction Program Related Activities



What will the final justification be?

Weapons of Mass Destruction Program Related Activity Thoughts



It makes perfect sense. Sadaam committed a thought-crime violation under section 1984 of the Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. Evolving from slime to scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 20th 2025, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC