|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
maddezmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 07:39 PM Original message |
(FISA)Immunity delay will be vetoed(according to Mukasey and McConnell) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. How could they veto a filibuster? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 09:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
16. If you read the OP, it's not a filibuster |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 05:47 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. I know it's not a filibuster, my point is a filibuster could accomplish the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Uh huh. So why did you ask the question then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. It was a rhetorical question, you didn't to answer it. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. OK then...a rhetorical question as the first response to the OP... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 06:58 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Well, I was referring to the promise of veto, but you're correct I should have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. And now we're back to my original point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Regarding veto, do you mean other than the heading and the first paragraph? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Well let's see, if one reads *beyond* the first paragraph |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. Easy answer... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 04:53 AM Response to Reply #2 |
13. "But does Reid have the stones?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frog92969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
3. So let Chimpy veto the bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
4. I would love to see this get before the American public: "If telecoms get tried, people die." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minnesota_liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
5. Fortunately it's impossible to veto a delay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kay1864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 09:17 AM Response to Reply #5 |
15. Actually it's not, if you read the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. What better reason could there be to hold up this abomination of a bill than to piss off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hulk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. Let him veto.....then, the weight can be on his pathetic shoulders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoodleyAppendage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
8. Thanks Charles Schumer & Diane Feinstein, you good for nothing pieces-of-sh*t. Thanks for fascist AG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Amonester (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. their consistent enabling "pays" them well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spag68 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
10. All New Yorkers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-07-08 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
11. So it gets vetoed? So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 04:23 AM Response to Original message |
12. How does Evil DickTater intend to veto a delay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-08-08 07:20 AM Response to Original message |
14. Then make him fucking veto it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC