Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate bows to Bush, approves surveillance bill (4th Amendment null & void)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 04:58 PM
Original message
Senate bows to Bush, approves surveillance bill (4th Amendment null & void)
Source: AP

Senate bows to Bush, approves surveillance bill
Associated Press



Bowing to President Bush's demands, the Senate sent the White House a bill Wednesday overhauling bitterly disputed rules on secret government eavesdropping and shielding telecommunications companies from lawsuits complaining they helped the U.S. spy on Americans.

The relatively one-sided vote, 69-28, came only after a lengthy and heated debate that pitted privacy and civil liberties concerns against the desire to prevent terrorist attacks. It ended almost a year of wrangling over surveillance rules and the president's warrantless wiretapping program that was initiated after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Just under a third of the Senate, including Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, supported an amendment that would have stripped immunity from the bill. They were defeated on a 66-32 vote. Republican rival John McCain did not attend the vote.

Obama ended up voting for the final bill, as did Specter. Feingold voted no.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080709/ap_on_bi_ge/terrorist_surveillance



We have now moved from a <i>de facto</i> police state, to a <i>de jure</i> police state.

Obama, now that he has the nomination, felt it safe to betray us in order to show his loyalty to corporate America and to pander to the imaginary Bush supporters who he thinks will vote for him.

Other Democratic traitors who chose to nullify the 4th Amendment:

Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Conrad (D-ND)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lincoln (D-AR)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Obama (D-IL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Roberts (R-KS)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)

The Republic is no more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sickening.
Absolutely sickening.

Maat, J.D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. Horrid and Disgusting
Some "Profile in Courage" displayed by these snivelers and weaklings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #39
54. You are right, Sir, and thank you for your service.
These are not the ideals that you fought for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Our presidential nominee is a traitor now?
Give us a break...

It's not about pandering, it's about winning the fucking presidency over McCain and preventing another four more years of disastrous policies (like this one.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. If Obama voted for this, he is a traitor.
I am starting to wonder about him. This is not the first time DU has had to make excuses for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The guy is busy getting himself elected president
There's nothing to "wonder about." His issue papers are still up on his website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. OMG what an appologist....
Obama agrees with Bush on this issue... It is bad law it is bad for American Civil Liberties it allows intrusive govt in your life.... Will you continue to appologize for Obama simply because he has A (D) after his name ... Have you learned nothing.... I will not sit idlly by and blindly support someone whose policies are against the very fabric of this country. Obama is a traitor and he is quickly losing my vote. Whats next morphed position on troop deployments in Iraq? What else hard lined military action against Iran... Obama is morphing into Bush lite... and Why the President is a failure why take that road... Be different stand on your convictions and principles at least Bush did as much even though they are all wrong... Obama is afraid and that is bad leadership....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes, I'm going to blindly support Obama
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 05:39 PM by high density
I don't know what presidential race you are watching, but I have two clear choices in this race: A total fucking loon or a guy that isn't too bad on most issues. I'll choose the guy who isn't too bad on most issues. My convictions mean jack squat because I'm not running for president, and a presidential candidate couldn't care less about how I feel personally.

Focus your anger on McCain and the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. My only concern is
that Obama is starting to look like he's WAY to the right of McCain, and that's scary.:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. Don't tell poster High Density that
He seems completely enamoured by any candidate that runs with a (D) next to their name... Personally, I don't know how he sleeps at night supporting a candidate that is anti-Democratic... Sure I may wind up voting for Obama but at least I will remain an active advocate against this brand of Change.... which in effect is not change I want to believe in at all.... Seems like some on this board would rather we not discuss our candidates flawed policies.... Hell I say if they are screwing up we hold them accountable that at least is much closer to true Democracy then the Repukes can claim or handle...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. This was a test of integrity
and Obama failed, badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #42
58. Yeah, I'll hold my nose & vote for Obama too.
Damnit, I really wish we had a true progressive Dem. candidate. Dennis Kucinich would have been nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. No, we are now back to the lesser of evils
when I though it was going to be about leadership.

Yes, I will vote for Obama, because I have no fucking choice. But goddamn him just the same. He is still a traitor who has sacrificed the Constitution on the altar of his political ambition.

I am sorry if the truth bothers some folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. Fuck his papers
It's his vote that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alllyingwhores Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
66. Can you say BULLSHIT? There's is nothing politically advantageous about Obama...
...voting for this bill. The corporate media doesn't need an excuse to frame him as flipping on an issue or weak or caving under pressure--he just fucking handed it to them.

The only obvious explanation is that he is bought and paid for by the telecoms and other related criminal corporate backers. END OF FUCKING STORY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. Second the motion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
63. So what are you going to do, vote for McCain?
If you think our civil liberties have been assaulted by *this* bill, just think what'll happen if McSame is elected president.

Sometimes you have to vote for the lesser of two evils.

Oh, hell, let's be honest: You ALWAYS have to vote for the lesser of two evils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Looks like it.
You thought that you were voting for a change?

Ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. That is some sacrifice to win
Let Bush's criminal activities go unpunished and let the telecoms spy on us all---just to win. Wow. That is real democracy in action. Mickey Mouse would win over McCain in this election---but now, many Obama supporters are outraged at his flip flopping just to win an election. They will not vote for Obama and he blew it with this vote. He looks to be going the way of Kerry and the rest of the losers. Thanks for telling us we must suffer the loss of our rights just so that a flip flopper candidate can pander to the right and ignore the rest of us, in order to "win" What kind of a "win" would that be, I wonder.

The two parties have melded into one party. They all seem to be in the same camp and wow we voter think we have a choice? No choice. McCain the bad old guy and Obama the opportunist so he can win . And after he wins, what crystal ball will tell us what he would do? More flip flops? Just to stay in office? Sorry, but I am very very disappointed in Obama. He ran a brillian primary campaign, but is now going down the road of the rest of the losers.

My two cents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. He has ZERO chance of picking up any of the Bush 29%
with this vote. This was craven selling out to the telcos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. It IS about pandering
He vowed to vote against the bill, got the nomination, then voted for the bill.

I am tired of folks trying to claim Obama should get a free pass while he sells us and the country out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
51. Stop....
The Thought policy want to let you know that this is exactly how "four more years of disastrous policies" start. Nobody is advocating voting for McCain. We are saying to you to get mad. Don't take this crap especially from our side... because when they come for you there may be no one left to defend you as you gleefully went down the road hand in hand with the sell outs...

Take a stand and get involved don't placate bad decisions.... We are not the Repukes.... so don't start acting like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
52. He has violated the oath he took as a senator to protect the Constitution
Maybe he's not a traitor, but at best he's a coward and he certainly cannot be trusted to keep his word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tidy_bowl Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
55. Please....
...that is the same nonsense of 'we had to burn the village in order to save it'. Obama is a DINO as he has proven by all the reversals of the last two weeks and now this. It is not too late to take this all the way to Denver to draft Hillary. At least she voted against this bill. How can you still support this traitor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiveideals Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
62. Can we move past this issue?
Can't wait till we return to tackling the Iraq war and the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fight Back! Join the MoneyBomb on August 8!
"The first campaign of this new organization is the formation of Strange Bedfellows, the ideologically diverse coalition we have formed with liberals, libertarians and others who are devoted to the preservation of our core constitutional liberties and the rule of law. Before it has even begun, The Wall St. Journal and numerous online venues have written about this unique coalition.

To initiate and fund our new campaign, we have teamed with the individual who was behind the innovative and extraordinarily successful Ron Paul "money bombs" -- Trevor Lyman, along with Rick Williams and Break the Matrix -- to plan an "Accountability Money Bomb" for August 8. That is the day in 1974 when Richard Nixon was forced to resign from office for his lawbreaking and surveillance abuses. That day illustrates how far we have fallen in this country in less than 35 years, as we now not only permit rampant presidential lawbreaking and a limitless surveillance state, but have a bipartisan political class that endorses it and even retroactively protects the lawbreakers. "

More at links:
http://www.accountabilitynowpac.com/

Glenn Greenwald:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/07/08/accountability/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ron Paul... say no more
Don't have to worry about giving a cent to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biermeister Donating Member (425 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. kick!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PFunk Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not yet it hasn't.
But now it's time to, well get off the pot and fight! Because the republic really will be no more if we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Bowing to President Bush's demands..."
Damn, just think what Bush could do if he had a majority of Americans approving of his presidency, instead of just 28%!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't like the bill, but nice framing again by the AP
Later the article talks about a compromise, but it's "a bow to Bush" in the headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. It is a bow to Bush and no compromise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. I was talking about the article's double standards
Plus, Bush already thinks he's king - doesn't need this language. LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ytzak Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. RIP US Constitution
It appears that McBush = OBush & Republican = Democrat

Stick a thermometer in us. We are done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh the high drama! Yes, the Constitution is destroyed and the Republic has crumbled.
Why even bother to have an election in November? On that note, let me say that on August 8 I will be sending another contribution to Obama's presidential campaign just because I can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. So I take it that you ...
Agree with his position on this law?

You may want to rethink your party affiliation while your at it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. Well, be my guest
Since he has folks like you to rely on, he doesn't need my money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyldRogue Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Well....
.... guess it's going to be Hello President McCain.

The whole Democrat Party are a bunch of spineless cowards that caved-in time and time again and this time, it was the straw that broke the camel's back

The union I am involved in have rescinded our support for the Dem majority and sad to report this, Obama made a huge blunder for going lockstep. He turned his back on We the People.

As of now, over 15,000 members of our union will NOT be voting for ANYONE with an R or a D.

IF they can't stand up for all of us at THIS point in time, they won't stand up for us in the future either..

Good job Dems, you sure showed us huh? All that huffing and puffing was just for show to get you guys in office...

We Indies won't forgive nor forget how you sold We the People out!

Flame all you want but how can I support candidates/senators/representatives that will not support nor stand up for me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Better just curl up in the fetal position and suck your thumb then.
Or are you going to vote for McCain or Barr in protest?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyldRogue Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Are you that daft???
McBush won't be getting any votes from any of us and had you actually READ my response, you would have seen that we would not be voting this go-round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. So you're not going to vote, but you're still going to complain?
Whatever. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyldRogue Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Not even going....
... to entertain the thought of letting a kid like you under my black skin so take care and vote for your candidate as it will be Hello new boss, same as the old boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. This is a Democratic board. I support our candidate.
You should probably read the rules because you're breaking them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyldRogue Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. So...
... one is SUPPOSED to go lockstep and just do as your told to do without having any sort of Opinion concerning who and what you are voting for and if they are on the same page as you or not?

Sorry but I'm not a drone/sheep/bot/fool.

If one cannot express differing opinions then how is it DEMOCRATIC?

He shot himself in the foot before he got into the WH and it's through no fault of mine. When I finally decided on who I would vote for, the true colors (yellow) showed through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Comparing our candidate to "the old boss" aka Bush is against the rules.
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 06:39 PM by tridim
But it's not just against the rules, it's also incredibly troll-like.

It's your choice if you want to follow Skinner's rules.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyldRogue Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Actually....
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 06:48 PM by WyldRogue
....was referencing the Dem controlled ( wow, controlled?) Congress in there as well.

And it just seems to me that instead of standing up for yourself and complaining to YOUR Senator/Rep/Candidate, you single me out and essentially want me to NOT be outraged, incensed, disgusted at the back-stabbing going on with the folks I helped get elected as they were SUPPOSED to support me as I supported them.

So turn your attention to the task at hand, which is to stand up, be counted, and be heard otherwise, we'll lose more liberties and freedoms if no one stands up...

And if I am in the wrong for feeling betrayed by the whole FISA thing then I will apologize but my anger is sincere but I won't just give in nor turn a blind eye to what is going on in our country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. You're never going to be heard if you give up and don't vote
And BTW I never said I wasn't upset about FISA, I am. I'm just not going to take it all out on our candidate and help McShithead get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WyldRogue Donating Member (312 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Our candidate....
.... our candidate....

Our candidate is SUPPOSED to represent those that support/supported him. His cave-in did alot of damage to his credibility. I'll vote for him if I have to but now he has to win me over yet again. I am totally shocked how fast he turned once he became the presumptive.... wonder how far he'll turn once in the WH?

And here's the killer of all of this:

It was ONLY the GOP and * that wanted this edited FISA bill while MILLIONS of HIS constituents (Dem, Indy and some Repubs) did not want that bill to be passed but who listed to who??

Obama didn't listen to my concerns (hell, none of the Dem-elect has either) nor did he hear my voice. He turned his back on me and my fellow Americans when he allowed that bill to pass without putting up much of a fight (maybe a strongly worded letter and speech will make up for that discrepancy as it seems to be the Dem-way).

If my father, grandfather, great-grandfather and uncles were alive to witness this subjugation, they'd be disgusted at how these so called Elected officials are ignoring We the People and bowing down like spineless cowards. Patriotism indeed....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. You have a strange idea of the rules
Supporting does not mean accepting everything he does. He gets my vote, but not my money, my time, or my support. NO ONE is above criticism, especially when they dick us over the way Obama just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
47. Why would we vote for fucking McCain?
Obama will get my vote, but he is rapidly giving the electorate a choice between a faux Republican and a real one.

When the attack ads come out, he just kicked in the teeth the very people who would have defended him and fought back.

At this point, he has my vote, but not my money or my support. He can get his money and foot soldiers from AT&T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. Obama is not a Republican.
Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Why because the media put a (D) after his name
Supporting this flawed law is something that a Republican would do no a Democrat so you tell me what is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #56
64. And Lieberman is an "independent"
When you side with George Bush, sell out your supporters and the Constitution, the key words are "traitor", "tool" and "liar".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. SCOTUS could knock it down
Edited on Wed Jul-09-08 05:50 PM by BadgerKid
after the election. I just can't see how the RW would allow themselves to be subjected to surveillance by a Democratic president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
49. The Scalia court?
Maybe, but I don't see how anyone will have grounds to bring the matter before the court. The issue is now moot. Lawbreaking was legalized, corporate profits and Bush have been protected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #49
68. There's a takings issue
which could be very interesting, since the Scalia block has been advancing the takings clause since the 1980's.

Funny how law is a two edged sword sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Bowing and Bending over are two differnt things
Once again the Democrats dropped 'em - Bent over - grabbed their cheeks - spread 'em and smiled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. so many Dems caving. What are we missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForrestGump Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. What we're missing are

people on the Hill who actually represent We, the People.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
61. i just don't understand why they're caving into an idiot like bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. Does anyone know if Kennedy made it back in time for the vote? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
50. Yes,
and he voted against, God bless 'im.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
38. "Senate Bows to Bush"
That's about the size of it. You'd think we didn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danmel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
53. New York Senators both voted against this monstrosity
as did my Congressman, Steve Israel.

I am profoundly disappointed in Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
57. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #57
65. She's no better
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 12:16 AM by Kelvin Mace
though on the right side of this particular issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minnesota_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
60. Obama still has my vote in November but no more $
There's no way I will send money to a candidate who fails to uphold their pledge to defend the Constitution. I'll focus my contributions on state and congressional races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nilram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
67. Bow? What do you mean? People only bow to royality.
Kings and such.


Oh.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Jan 02nd 2025, 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC