|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
FourScore
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:26 PM Original message |
Democrats May Kick Out Joe Lieberman If He Addresses The Republican National Convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drum
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
1. Recommended. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phred42
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
104. What my Dog Thinks of Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCaliDem
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:30 PM Response to Reply #104 |
151. Cherish that dog forever! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikeargo
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
2. About damn time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftyMom
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:40 PM Original message |
That's what I was going to post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SCRUBDASHRUB
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rontun
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 04:54 AM Response to Reply #4 |
34. I'm willing to bet we wouldn't be in this insane war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
connecticut yankee
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #34 |
112. I don't think so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #112 |
155. Got *any* proof, or just talking out your ass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnneD
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #112 |
161. So who does he represent..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
connecticut yankee
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #161 |
166. He's often referred to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nachoproblem
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
137. Lieberman believes the Democratic party "lost its way" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 07:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
154. He would be running for RE-Election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tomreedtoon
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:34 AM Response to Reply #2 |
35. Yeah. What took them so long? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
146. What disturbs me is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:27 PM Response to Reply #146 |
169. What disturbs me is that a number of top Democrats supported him as an Independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tularetom
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. That's a good sign for a couple of reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
122. It sure would be nice to see some spine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RNdaSilva
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #122 |
139. For a change... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Dawn
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
5. Considering how spineless this Congress has been so far... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:00 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. ...they'll probably make him Majority Leader! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Corgigal
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
6. works for me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 10:58 PM Response to Original message |
7. Lieberman is the lowest form of life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:02 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Why do you hate Jews? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:40 AM Response to Reply #18 |
37. Deleted sub-thread |
sellitman
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #18 |
81. You are the one with tendacies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmowreader
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #81 |
87. "Holy Joe" is Lieberman's DU nickname |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #81 |
156. Didn't you get the memo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:02 PM Response to Original message |
8. kick that POS to the curb and good riddance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. If they haven't kicked his ass out now over his past electoral troubles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FREEWILL56
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:56 AM Response to Reply #9 |
28. You are right. How could he have multiple political designations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucognizant
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #28 |
79. He does vote with the Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #9 |
84. He caucuses with the Dems, which means, along with Sanders, the Dems have the majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #84 |
110. I'm joining Sanders party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
10. He shoould have been stripped of any status long ago... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
11. Know this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WheelWalker
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. And he looks like he smells bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #11 |
19. I don't think it has anything to do with Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:17 AM Response to Reply #11 |
26. Every Jewish person I know sees right through that nonsense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caradoc
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:07 AM Response to Reply #26 |
39. Retire? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucognizant
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #26 |
80. Maybe he'll run for the Israeli Parliment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #80 |
92. No he isn't,. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maat
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #92 |
135. Many American citizens that were born here have become Israeli citizens also ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:40 PM Response to Reply #135 |
147. he doesn't have dual citizenship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #135 |
157. Research all you like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #11 |
85. I hate Joe too but you are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #85 |
111. Well, I seem to remember he has intimated that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
103. Let him...lieman needs to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewEnglandGirl
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
12. Is he really going to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ashling
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
13. May? MAY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unapatriciated
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:36 AM Response to Reply #13 |
57. That was the first word I thought too MAY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #13 |
113. "may" just says it ALL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baby_mouse
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #13 |
133. Ridiculous isnt it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sat Jul-12-08 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
14. The Connecticut Boll Weevil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
17. The Republicans won't want him either. He'll be powerless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
regnaD kciN
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Yep... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DAMANgoldberg
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:34 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. to be fair... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:56 AM Response to Reply #20 |
24. I was about to say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllyCat
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
21. Sorry. I can't believe much of what NoFacts says and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
travelingtypist
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
102. This. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarthDem
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
23. Loooooooooong Overdue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LuckyLib
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
25. No, just consider him invisible. Ignore him. No mention. Ever. Joe who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:42 AM Response to Original message |
27. He should not even be allowed NEAR the Democratic convention /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave123williams
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:33 AM Response to Original message |
29. Uhm, why don't they kick him out NOW? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:38 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. because he gives us the majority (51) which includes bernie sanders |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:14 AM Response to Reply #31 |
41. Not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #41 |
100. well, jeez, if that's true and the rules were changed--then what the fuck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dave123williams
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #31 |
88. Whatever. Dems have displayed little to no backbone even with a slim majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Golden Raisin
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:22 AM Response to Original message |
30. That'll be right after Pelosi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SomeGuyInEagan
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:45 AM Response to Reply #30 |
60. Yup. Hollow, gutless words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib2DaBone
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 04:24 AM Response to Original message |
32. SOMEbody Please...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karl_Bonner_1982
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 04:36 AM Response to Original message |
33. You know, maybe we should give Lieberman a break... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tab
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:58 AM Response to Reply #33 |
47. Well, then, he should be an independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
canucksawbones
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:15 AM Response to Reply #33 |
49. the fact that he is fully supporting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:20 AM Response to Reply #33 |
51. Joe really stuck it to the voters of CT, didn't he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #51 |
136. Yup. That's the bottom line. Regardless of particular positions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:21 AM Response to Reply #33 |
53. To be an independent is fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:27 AM Response to Reply #33 |
55. Joe caucuses with the Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #55 |
119. This has been my concern about him too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maryland Liberal
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:35 AM Response to Reply #33 |
56. This sends out 2 Very BAD messages |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:30 AM Response to Reply #56 |
77. You, and the poster at #33 that you're responding to, are both missing a key point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
97. How was Chafee "alienated"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DarthDem
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:16 PM Response to Reply #33 |
129. He's an Opportunist, Not an Independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ForeignSpectator
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
36. "May" huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nradisic
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
38. What trhe fuck took so long? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:10 AM Response to Original message |
40. Why wait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
42. Jesus, Dems, now don't go do anything rash |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
43. Well if Robert Novack says it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nightrain
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:21 AM Response to Original message |
44. good. it's about time. finally showing a bit of spine?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tab
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:42 AM Response to Original message |
45. As well they should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Politicub
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
46. Zell Miller and now Joe Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:13 AM Response to Original message |
48. I'm surprised it took this long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #48 |
121. One bright spot in this is I can't believe that the Republican base |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
50. Yank the rug out from under him when he isn't looking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
minnesota_liberal
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
52. Why wait? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graywarrior
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. That's my first thought, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustAnotherGen
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
58. It's about time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace frog
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
59. BUH BYE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:47 AM Response to Original message |
61. Dems Will Cave |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
man4allcats
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
62. They should've kicked him out a long time ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
63. MAY??????? MAY??????????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
64. First, lock him in a room for a few minutes with Jesse "The Blade" Jackson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #64 |
91. Jackson wouldn't be interested... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DailyGrind51
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
65. I read that this morning and immediately said to myself, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myrina
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
66. "May" ??? How 'bout WILL? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
file83
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #66 |
90. "May" - because it's never-gonna-happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
67. Lieberman has been bad for the Democrats since the Clinton Administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abelenkpe
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
68. Yes Please! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dukkha
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
69. Can Pelosi be next? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hope And Change
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
70. K & R! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nickgutierrez
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
71. Keep the source in mind, everybody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
72. I believe it when I see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mbperrin
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
73. Or maybe just a sternly worded letter.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Liberal Thinker
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
74. Wow, could you imagine that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikekohr
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Does Conneticut have a recall provision in their election code? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Liberal Thinker
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #75 |
89. Unfortunately, I don't believe they do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:05 PM Response to Reply #75 |
94. The people of Corrupticutt made their choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
76. Deleted message |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #76 |
96. I can't believe I'm defending this twerp... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #96 |
159. You are not defending him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:52 PM Response to Reply #76 |
109. Unfortunately,most of the dems have abandoned the party... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluerum
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:33 AM Response to Original message |
78. Liars. He lost the democratic midterm primary in his state and he ran as independent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
82. "may".... lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
83. Say good bye to Traitor Joe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
young_at_heart
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
86. He was a terrible choice for Gore's VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #86 |
93. The chance to win Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enthusiast
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
95. He is a traitor! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hulk
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
98. We have kissed his ass for the last time....now toss him overboard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
99. may? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
101. Why wait ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windoe
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
105. McCain's side kick is out of the question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
106. Lieberman will be McBush's VP. (kill two birds with one stone) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jzodda
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:43 PM Response to Original message |
107. If he leaves the Dem Caucus doesn't that hand the Senate to the Reps? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
108. Political ploy - this does nothing, really, satifies a few lefties-but does not stop the war or FISA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
114. Deleted message |
Herman74
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
115. From Democratic Party Vice Presidential Candidate to Expulsion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBlueSky
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
116. I don't think we should be talking like this... yet... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
117. I hold this comment a bit suspect - geez Robert Novak made it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KamaAina
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
118. Suppose the Senate ends up exactly 60-40 Dem with him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bow-tie
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
120. He must really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #120 |
158. Any proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #158 |
160. Deleted message |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 01:46 PM Original message |
So Republicans are somehow the Israeli party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Behind the Aegis
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #160 |
165. So no proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #120 |
162. Correction: He must really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lint Head
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
123. He left a long time ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
penndragon69
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
124. LiberScum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donkeykick
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
125. Cool! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kmac3
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
126. Move cautiously . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
127. With some minor changes, this could be great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
128. We can't kick him out--he isn't in to begin with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radonc
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
130. It's about D Time! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bamacrat
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
131. Good, they should have when he supported the Republican candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
132. Dump him in October ... just a head of the elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jhain
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 05:45 PM Response to Original message |
134. May??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
138. I 90th that motion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 07:55 PM Response to Original message |
140. As they should.... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
141. I bet a star for a DUer that all they do is write him a sternly-worded letter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RNdaSilva
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
142. The "last straw" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasLady
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
143. GTFO!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
144. Sayonara, Joe! Dont let the door hit your ass on the way out! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cascadian
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
145. Please do it, Joe! Speak to them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maestro
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:44 PM Response to Original message |
148. Good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
149. Sorry, but what happens to Lieberman is sooooo far down the list. Jail for Rove, Cheney, Rummy, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #149 |
164. agree on that.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:22 PM Response to Reply #164 |
167. Pleeease don't tease me with the Hague. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
150. Could we also just plain kick him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 09:25 PM Response to Reply #150 |
168. Love it. Where in Oregon are you from? I was raised in Portland South East. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ammonium
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
152. This could have been done years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fox Mulder
![]() |
Sun Jul-13-08 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
153. Why didn't they kick him out long ago? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flagg
![]() |
Mon Jul-14-08 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
163. You mean he hadn't been kicked out already ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC