By Vernon Loeb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 5, 2004; Page A14
Democrats in Congress took aim yesterday at the Bush administration's proposed $401.7 billion defense budget in what promises to be a contentious election-year debate, faulting Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld for trying to hide the cost of the war in Iraq.
In lengthy hearings before the House and Senate Armed Services committees, leading Democrats questioned Rumsfeld's decision to leave the cost of ongoing military operations in Iraq out of the budget, saying they cannot set defense priorities without some estimate for personnel and sustainment costs that could be as high as $50 billion in fiscal 2005, which begins Oct. 1.
Rumsfeld and other administration officials have said they plan to fund military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan through a supplemental appropriation to be offered in early 2005, months after the presidential election.
Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.) called the administration's budget proposal "extraordinarily ineffective and misleading" and told Rumsfeld that he has an "obligation to come before us with a detailed estimate of the cost and what you propose to do in the way of covering those costs."
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) called the administration's plan to fund the war in a post-election supplemental "inappropriate."
more................
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13976-2004Feb4.html