Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: Arms 'We Thought' Were in Iraq Are Not Found

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:09 PM
Original message
Bush: Arms 'We Thought' Were in Iraq Are Not Found
CHARLESTON, S.C. (Reuters) - President Bush acknowledged on Thursday that the United States has not found banned weapons "we thought" were in Iraq, but defended the war as "the right thing" to do.

"We have not yet found the stockpiles of weapons that we thought were there," Bush said in a speech at the port of Charleston, South Carolina. However, he said, "Knowing what I knew then and knowing what I know today, America did the right thing in Iraq."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040205/ts_nm/bush_dc&cid=564&ncid=1480
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. and when I saw "we"
I mean everyone everyone except Hans Blix, Scott Ritter, most of the CIA, most of the DIA, the IAEA, Jaque Chirac, Jean Chretien, Gerard Schroeder, Robin Cook, Dennis Kucinich, Paul Wellstone, Greg Thielman...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "What we don't know yet is what we thought"...Bush
President speaking at the cabinet meeting a couple of days ago.

I love watching this guy speak without notes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. add to that....
DOE, DOS, and the Army Intelligence.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. and...
Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Rice, Cheney and proabably even Dumbo himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. ...and millions of demonstrators world wide in October 2002
Bet he wishes he listened to "focus groups" now!

(I know he doesn't)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. You forgot a couple of thousand DUers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. "I don't negotiate with myself" (from "The Price of Loyalty")
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 12:15 PM by Richardo
O'Neill: "I wanted to say to the President that all sound analysis is about negotiating with yourself."

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. O'neill rocks the truth in this book.
I really wish he would come out of closet on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. But he never said "we thought."
It was always "we know thry'ew there" when speaking of the weapons. Thinking and knowing are two very different things.

Which one is it, Mr. Bush? We you and yours lying when you said you knew where the weapons are- Rummy, for example. In and around Baghdad, Tikrit.

I'm having trouble keeping the daily lies straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shadder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. You think your having trouble keeping the daily lies straight?
Whats really neat is that they are having trouble keeping their daily lies straight at this point and it's really starting to show.

It will not be too much longer before ther damn breaks....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. A worm slowly turning
Just imagine the lead on this AP story had it been written last year... "In a warmly received, spirited defense of his plan for protecting the homeland, President Bush cited extensive evidence to support the removal of Saddam Hussein..."

Now, the WMD issue gets top billing, even though it was a comparatively tiny portion of his blathering speech. In my desperate search for faint glimmers of hope, this actually registers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidsmaf Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. So called "weapons of mass destruction."
The only reason why Bush is so sure that Iraq has these weapons of mass destruction is because he has the receipt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. Hi Vidsmaf!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebuzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. Hello and welcome Vidsmaf.....!!
:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Imagine how warmly this line of rationale would have gone over
with the public as THE REASON to go to war with Iraq. "Its the right thing to do." "We don't have good intelligence, but we think he is an evil man who might be pursuing weapons of mass destruction program related activities".

While Osama was still running wild.

While there are other "Bad Men".

The tipping point for the public seemed to have been the images of immenent threat of nuclear weapons used against the US. I don't think he would have got his war on with the rhetoric he is using today. And indeed I think that is why he didn't use that rhetoric from March 2002-March 2003 as they tried to build their case for war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Most Americans will fall into the trap and let it ride.
The dirty bastard lied, but conventional wisdom created by the media will be "WMDs? No big deal. The President did what was right"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. History will punish them.
History will state that at the start of the 3rd millennium, the American people acted very sheepishly toward the exploits of their new dictator and that this was the reason why their once great country fell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. drip, drip, drip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Cool. I guess Clinton's finally off the hook.
Since it can't be the (alleged) lying that mattered, then we are left with the obvious conclusion that what really matters is whether Bill "thought" is was the right thing to do or not. OK.

Oh wait, maybe it's OK to lie first and act stupid later, but not act stupid first then lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shugah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. "i come before you
to stand behind you, and tell you something i know nothing about." -GWB on any given tuesday that is good friday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh well, honest mistake
No harm done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woofless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. The part that fried me
paraphrase: "Because we acted, Sadam no longer has weapons cababilities." WTF? What weapons and what capability? The ones you just said were not (yet) found? Totally devoid of logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Here's a thought - since W and the Repukes don't care how many
American Military lives it takes to rid the world of the Evil (undefined, and moving), then he should propose:

Sending in tanks to blast everything that gets in the way of anybody searching for WMDs.

Sending in wave after wave of US military personnel, armed to the teeth with orders to shoot anything that moves (if he doesn't care how many of our soldiers' lives, why should he worry about the witnesses to the atrocities? Bulldozers make convenient and quick mass grave diggers, ask anybody from Gulf91) after the tanks to search for the WMDs that are supposedly buried there!

Oh, wait, it's not "sexy" to uncover "programs" anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Bad Chimp, Bad, now put those WMD's away.
Bush also blasted critics of the war, saying, "If some politicians in Washington had their way, Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) would still be in power." Yet this evil bastard, selected president forgets what God really wanted him to say: "If the anti-war people in Washington had their way, 528 U.S. service men and women would still be alive today," not to mention our 3000 wounded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. Whatever slender thread of specious legality
The war had, using the phony U.N. resolutions argument, is certainly dead now.

"Knowing what I knew then and knowing what I know today, America did the right thing in Iraq."

In other words he is saying he would have invaded no matter what, and all the smoke being blown about Saddam not cooperating with the U.N. was just that - smoke and mirrors.

Imagine a cop saying, on the stand, "I busted down the door looking for drugs as my probable cause, but there were no drugs. However, even if I had known there were no drugs I would have still busted down the door. After all, the resident had assaulted his spouse, and that's what I really cared about all along. Plus, this way I get to keep his house."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. "Knowing what I knew then and knowing what I know today"
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 01:55 PM by yellowcanine
Just exactly what did you know then and what do you know now, Mr. Bush? Inquiring minds want to know. How is it that you can begin to "know" anything, since you seem to have very little curiosity about anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinnypriv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. Okay, surely the dems should play these videos:
"We found the weapons of mass destruction" - Bush 03

"We have not yet found the stockpiles of weapons" - Bush 04

With a scrolling ticker on an ad (aircraft carrier in background):

USS CLUELESS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. Aren't those the same words Tenet used?
Didn't Bush, Cheney, and Powell tell us before the invasion that they were absolutely sure about WMD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Tenet did say
, made a referrence to the CIA as only providing the data with memos and that what interpretations happensafter that, is NOT made by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. kick - Thanks for pointing out the dupe I posted Barrett808. Take care n/t
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 11:02 PM by NNN0LHI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. no problemo - catch ya later n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
30. More lies - Bush doesn't "think"
He just regurgitates whatever Cheney, Rove and the Neo-Cons want him to. Just like a big wooden dummy with a hand stuck up his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
32. Bush though he could get away with an illegal invasion
by saying he "thought" Saddam was a threat.

This was the plan, after all. Since he was so successful in the con game in the congress of the US, I suppose he, and his cabal, also thought they could bully the US into this spurious reason to kill and murder and plunder another country.

It may even work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC