Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Drudge: House and Senate Fight for Witnesses for Broadcast Decency Hearing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:10 AM
Original message
Drudge: House and Senate Fight for Witnesses for Broadcast Decency Hearing
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash7.htm

House and Senate Committees are competing for witnesses for next week's simultaneous hearings Feb. 11 on broadcast content. The House Telecom Subcommittee, which will hold its 2nd hearing of the year on indecency, appears close to getting witnesses who relate more directly to the Janet Jackson flap. House sources told us the Subcommittee was close to getting Viacom Pres. Mel Karmazin and NFL Comr. Paul Tagliabue. All 5 FCC commissioners are expected to testify at both hearings, Communications Daily reports on Friday.

MORE

While both hearings focus on broadcast content, they appear to be taking somewhat different angles. The House Telecom Subcommittee will focus primarily on legislation (HR- 3717) by Subcommittee Chmn. Upton (R-Mich.) that would raise the maximum FCC fines for indecency violations. It's the Subcommittee's 2nd hearing this session on broadcast indecency; the first was Jan. 28 (CD Jan 29 p4). This hearing is scheduled for Feb. 11, 9:30 a.m., Rm. 2123, Rayburn Bldg.

Viacom, owner of CBS and MTV, should bear a heavier burden than its 200-plus affiliates as a result of allegations CBS aired indecent content during the Super Bowl half-time show, several attorneys said.

FCC Chmn. Powell, who's spearheading investigation of the broadcast, could consider Viacom a repeat offender, suggested attorney Frank Jazzo. Jazzo referred to the case against Viacom-owned Infinity Bcstg. for broadcasting an Opie & Anthony show where the hosts conducted a contest encouraging listeners to have sex in unusual places. WKRK- FM, also Viacom-owned, was fined for airing a 20-min. show discussing explicit sexual acts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sliverofhope Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. This just proves that American democracy is more ill than
I even imagined. It's not that we're all just apathetic and incapable of outrage. It's that we're not reacting with outrage to the right things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. ARG A BOOB!
OH THE HORROR! THE HORROR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. In 1995 CBS aired two of them on "Chicago Hope"...
2/4/04
By PHIL KLOER
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

In 1995, a young woman on a CBS television show pulled back her gown and exposed both of her breasts, completely. The show was "Chicago Hope," a medical drama, and the actress was playing a patient recovering from post-cancer breast reconstruction surgery. Even though it aired in prime time, CBS received not a peep of protest.

For a Super Bowl halftime show that revealed a lot less, CBS is now facing a federal government inquiry and continuing public outcry.

(snip)

While Powell, who was appointed by President Bush to head the FCC, was condemning Sunday's broadcast, Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean shrugged it off. "Considering what's on television these days, I think the FCC is being pretty silly about investigating this," Dean told reporters on the campaign trail.

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/0204a/04jackson.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow..so some investigations actually CAN get off the ground fast
with a Republican house, senate and white house! Amazing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Isn't that the truth?
Stolen election
9-11 investigation
Reagan, Bush I, Bush II papers suppressed
Cheney energy meetings
Powell lies to UN and world
No WMD
CIA agent outed
Anthrax killer

And so much more. Stonewalled. All stonewalled.

Boob on TV? National outrage. :-(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonDeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. TV is turning into soft porn. Its time to reign it in.
but all the republican outrage is getting kind of old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. The rest of the world is shaking its collective head at us once again.
Can you believe that someone would actually spend money to file suit against Janet on behalf of "all Americans." Don't include me in this suit. Can I file suit for being included?

That Congress would spend the time and money on this when so many really grave issues are facing this nation is amazing and frightening. It's alright to send young men and women off to fight an immoral, unnecessary, and illegal war that kills thousands of innocent men, women, and children...this is not obsecene but one bare bood is.

Shame, shame on America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC