Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stakes Are High for Both Bush and Interviewer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:44 AM
Original message
Stakes Are High for Both Bush and Interviewer
By Elizabeth Jensen and Johanna Neuman, Times Staff Writers

The president, facing dropping approval ratings and a drumbeat of criticism from the Democratic presidential candidates, could get a boost if he can hold his own against a journalist who is not easily intimidated. And Russert, who often has a subject's past words put on screen to back up his questions, will be in the tricky position of trying to get his questions answered while displaying the respect expected to be shown to the office of the president.

"Half of Washington is going to be mad at Russert," said Chuck Todd, editor of the Hotline, an online daily political briefing. "Either he's not going to be able to satisfy the critics of the president … or he's going to make the administration mad by being too tough on Bush. Then again, he's the best in the business; if anybody can handle this, it's got to be him."

Finding the right tone has proved tricky for those posing questions to the president on TV. At a March 6 news conference, shortly before the war with Iraq began, reporters were criticized for showing too much deference to Bush.


The president, meanwhile, has shown no compunction about pushing back if he doesn't like the questions. During an October news conference from the White House's Rose Garden, Bush joked with reporters about how they were dressed and their looks, but he wouldn't answer a query about Iraq troop reductions, calling it a "trick," and passed over another reporter who had interrupted him.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-russert7feb07,1,3680729.story?coll=la-headlines-nation


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lastknowngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. NOt really that hard all he needs to do is ask the shrub to
turn around and drop his pants so he can kiss his A**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. Russert is a BOOT LICK and a LAP DOG
he will throw some large slow DAY GLOW orange soft balls, for the CHIMPANZEE to smack out of the park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. "a journalist who is not easily intimidated"
Russert? Ummmmmmm....OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Welcome Aboard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. "Journalist"??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhino47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
48. Hiya Vickers Welcome to DU
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Welcome to you, Vickers, AND to rhino47!!
Glad to have both of you here! Welcome to the March toward Critical Mass. We are Weapons of CRITICAL MASS Destruction!!! (Just made that up! - you guys inspire me!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
49. Welcome To DU, Vickers!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Isn't "Russet" A POTATO(E)??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuckeFushe Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
55. I think it's already been taped
On WCBS news radio they were reading "quotes" from tomorrow's show.

Another snow job just got past the press.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
57. yes . . . the best in the business??
I wonder exactly what business that might be. :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. Re: Russert "best in the business"
A helpful example may be drawn from the Simpsons.
Montgomery Burns = Jack Welch
Waylon Smithers = Tim Russert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Could make or break his career
I agree that the stakes are high for this interview. People are getting turned off by Bush and his lies. If Russert throws softballs, it will be obvious and his credibility will fall like a stone with a large part of his audience (well, me at least).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. the stakes are high for the interviewer
if he asks tough questions or questions karl rove doesn't approve of, he's probably screwed.

russert works for nbc. nbc is owned by general electric, a very large defense contractor, mfr of turbines for power plants, and a very large depositor or pcb's into rivers and streams. they need to stay on the good side of the govt.

i look for russert to smooch w's butt till it's whiter than a soda cracker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cubsfan6969 Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bill o'reilly
This interview should be as hard hitting as Tim Russert's interview of Bill O'Reilly.:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Ha! Love the soda cracker imagery
But yes, he will lose viewers either way this goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. A recorded interview
is not an interview at all. It is a sit com. This one is indeed laughable.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vitruvius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. And both Russert and Bu$h will be working from a prepared SCRIPT.
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 02:33 PM by Vitruvius
And it will be a slickly done script; optimized to boost Bu$h while protecting Russert's ass.

See also flpoljunkie's thread: "Will Tim Russert try to rehabilitate Bush like he did Bill Bennett?" at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1094603 .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. "respect expected to be shown to the office of the president"
And when did they ever show this to Clinton, who was ELECTED, unlike Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. Touché, CalamityJane
Of course, Mr. G.E. Russert will show the same respect as he did to his neighbor and friend, Dick Cheney - both iive in the exclusive Kalorama suburb of D.C. where Mr. G.E. joked about seeing his chum on the Segway scooter. Wow, what a journalist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBlob Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. If they just did their JOBS instead of being
cowardly WHORES, it wouldn't be 'tricky' at all.

"Finding the right tone has proved tricky for those posing questions to the president on TV."

I don't think I've ever heard about "stakes being high" for a fricken INTERVIEWER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vitruvius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. But Russert's job is to BE a WHORE. And he does it very well.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
52. Right tone, my ass. You question him. If he flubs or sidesteps,
you press harder. He's nothing but just another interview subject. You show the same general respect to him that you do to anyone you interview. And you're as tough on him as you'd be to any other felon. I just hope people who see it tomorrow will recognize a hose job when they see one. And if so, that Tim Russert's career is dealt a serious credibility blow.

And it wouldn't surprise me if this happened, mainly because EVERYBODY and EVERYTHING that bush touches turns to shit. Why should Russert be any different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. Russert is the best in the business?
Okaaaay, riiiight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
56. You caught that, huh? They're spinning before the thing is aired...
<EOM>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is not journalism.
It will be the corporate media attempting to place Bush in a positive light. There is intent to make Bush look good. This will not be journalism. It will be propaganda. The corporate media is the enemy of progress and democracy. We must implement changes in our system to ensure the viability of truly objective and independent news outlets. Bush may as well be interviewed by Fox News. Russert is one and the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Lowball
The expectations game is being played yet again with Bush. All Russert has to do is ask a few tough questions, maybe follow up twice on AWOL and WMD, and if Bush doesn't piss his pants, he's Churchill.

The key is not the interview; the key is the Media reaction to the interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Right!
Edited on Sat Feb-07-04 12:36 PM by teryang
No matter what the chimp does or says he is lauded by the mainstream media. Odds are overwhelming this is the pattern that will be followed. The program will be carefully edited to remove all dumb expressions, pauses and statements. Afterwards, chimp will be hailed as demonstrating great leadership traits in trying times.

If it doesn't happen this way, it means that the power structure has decided its agenda is virtually complete anyway and will take generations to undo and that bozo needs to be dumped. As a major creditor, exporter of capital goods and producer of armaments, I don't expect GE to take this approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Very astute, Bok_Tukalo. . .
or to mangle Marshall McLuhan, "The media is the message."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhino91063 Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Respect?!?!
Chimp boy does not deserve any respect. He deserves impeachment and imprisonment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is this live or taped? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. They're taping it today
That way they can stop when needed so Bush can be given the answers and edit out any misenunciations.

I want to see Russert ask a question that makes Bush invoke National Security! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr.Green93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. live with a 14 hour delay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. Oh please, this is going to be a media whore giving fellatio to
the Unelected Fraud. The L.A. Times should know better! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lostmessage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. C-Span host said that it will be pre-taped
Do you honestly think that * could do a live interview without messing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
40. EDITED IN THE INTEREST OF NATIONAL SECURITY
because the 'Merikun people would feel insecure if they knew what bush really said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. Only at the debates...
will pres. ASSHOLE have a "real" chance to f*ck up onstage.

But I wouldn't put it past his scumbag handlers to stick a wireless earpiece in his rat ear and feed him the answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. Stalking, GWB style.
MTP will ask tough questions,

GWB will answer with rehersed official answers.

MTP will NOT followup on the question and let the smooth replies pass.

GWB will come out with no challenges and no "misunderstandings" because this is just a big campaign spot he doesn't have to pay for.

The candidates go to the primary states, GWB follows the primary by a day or two to try to get in the last word. The Democrat candidates are on MTP, GWB has to go on MTP, too. He can't let them have any media attention or any audience that he doesn't get, too. He is stalking the Democrat candidates. Following whereever they go so that he has the last say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Exactly.
"What do you say to critics who are concerned that no WMD were found in Iraq?"

"Well, I think the American people know that this is going to be a long, important struggle for freedom around the globe, and that our troops are the best in the world."

"Great answer! Moving on to football..." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catt04 Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
37. I agree that it will play out per your script
I also agree that Russert is in a no win situation. He would have to play hardball with Bush to get the answers and that will infuriate the Republicans They might even censure NBC like they did CBS in re the Reagans tv movie.

If Russert does his Cheney bit with Bush, then it's deeper into the MW pool he goes.

I am sure Rusert is well aware of both partisan consequences and what will appear to be partisan. Intersting to watch it unforld.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. Tim has already lost the "high stakes" game
if it's standard procedure of Meet The Press to be done live; if he submitted questions beforehand; if he received questions from the Bush Regime, or if Bush is allowed to use video or audio prompting. Is Russert willing to answer questions in that regard?


rocknation


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hotler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. Tough questions????
"At a March 6 news conference, shortly before the war with Iraq began, reporters were criticized for showing too much deference to Bush." No president should be immune to tough questions from the press. Shrub is lucky he doesn't have to face a system like in the UK Parliament. Those guys can chew some ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
26. Total BS
no need to watch. Why will this be any different than the usual deceit and lies we have come to expect. Smoke and mirrors. I would watch if Al Franken were asking the questions. I can dream anyway. Was it MTP were Rummy said "we know where they are" referring to WMDs, to me that has been the biggest lie of them all, but has anyone called him on it? I really used to like this country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hailtothechimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. The groundwork is being laid with stories like these.
The plan is to build Russert up (which is wholly without merit) so that bu$h's performance looks better than it really is. The scripts are already in the hands of the enablers in the administration, Congress, and the press. The question is will the people fall for it? Let's hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. Best in The Business?!? Standards Have Gotten Extremely Low
He's the biggest shill on the planet.

This whole thing is going to be an abomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alpharetta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
31. Helen Thomas should ask him for an interview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
33. Where do they get off even calling it "Meet the Press"
Back in the old days, the guest would be subject to tough questioning from four members of "the press," the real press. I don't know what Russert's background is, but I doubt he's "the press."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
39. If Russert had any guts he would do it live
Dan Rather interviewed/grilled George H W Bush back on January 25, 1988
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. if bush had any guts he'd force rove to let him do it live.
but bush is feeling a lot of insecurity since the polls have had him LOSING to an UNNAMED DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE.

it makes the little schnook think... "anyone but bush?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peterh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
42. After it’s all said and done….
I suspect that one will be hard pressed to see any difference between this one and the one done by Diane Sawyer. Russert will start out with the fluff stuff that will consume the first half hour, i.e.:

Sawyer: asked whether he had bought Laura Bush a Christmas present
Russert: can we ask what type of Valentine you got for Laura


The second half could provide some soundbites to play with, but like Sawyer, Russert will back away from follow up questions for further elaboration, i.e.:

SAWYER: But stated as a hard fact, that there were weapons of mass destruction, as opposed to the possibility that he could move to acquire those weapons still --
BUSH: So what's the difference?

Sawyer: <soooo….moving along>

If Russert does anything different, it’ll be to steer the twit to answer in a fashion that will have the least probability of opening a door for further elaboration.

Bottom line though….the twit being the twit, he is going to fuckup and provide an opening that even careful editing will be hard pressed to cover and timmy will again be exposed for being the partisan POS that he is…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
43. Bush Will Come Out Ahead
If he talks without drooling, the media will spin this as a huge victory for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellbound-liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I've always considered "Meet the Press-titute" to be a joke
I'd like to see Duh-bya answer one question from a real reporter like Amy Goodman or even Bill Moyers. This farce like the rest of Bush's pResidency is only intended for the slight of mind. Unfortunately, I'm afraid their numbers are growing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
45. Clinton probably had tougher interviews from Monica Lewinsky
Russert will be tough on Bush - it is to laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
46. Respect to the office,
yeah like Clinton got any and he was actually ELECTED twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snappy Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
47. Not gonna watch it.
I am not a masochist so I won't subject myself to this farce. I will read the after comments here. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. I'm with you Snappy
Watching either one of them makes me want to wretch. Watching both would send me right over the edge.

Luckily we can count on DU for an accurate play-by-lay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
54. PR from Meet the Press
MTP
The exclusive interview will originate from the Oval Office at the
White House and will be recorded live to tape on Saturday.

How can it be recorded live to tape on Saturday?????

Is it live or Memorex?

It is on at 9AM here in Ft Wayne. Awfully early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC