|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
x-g.o.p.er
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:28 PM Original message |
Al-Qaeda has tactical nuke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
brainshrub
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:31 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Welome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KissMyAsscroft
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:32 PM Response to Original message |
3. Ahhh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. Ha Aretz is pretty reliable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taeger
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:28 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla_Dem
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
63. Should blame Clinton's intelligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:55 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Then why didn't they use a nuke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla_Dem
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:17 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Just because you have it doesn't mean you have to use it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:27 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. But are we a desperate cash strapped hateful shadowy terrorist group? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fla_Dem
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:32 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. I don't believe that Al Qaida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:35 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. They are not a nation with tons of time and money and nukes at their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 10:14 AM Response to Reply #70 |
81. Use it or lose it my friend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcane1
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
5. well, that answers my question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
6. Well I guess we'll find out the veracity of this story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. Well, thanks George |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demdave
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:04 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. They reportedly obtained the nuke in 1998. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkseid69
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. if they obtained a nuke in 1998 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
23. Bingo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlant
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:26 AM Response to Reply #23 |
46. When you play chess, do you always attack with your queen first? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:31 AM Response to Reply #46 |
52. Well..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlant
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:13 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. The Pawn attack seems to be doing just fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voice_of_Europe
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:54 AM Response to Reply #46 |
54. Checkmate with Queen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zero Gravitas
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:05 PM Response to Reply #54 |
67. checkmate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:14 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. it's a flawed analogy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:32 PM Response to Reply #67 |
75. Oh yes it would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:17 AM Response to Reply #10 |
48. Deleted message |
calimary
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Actually, it'd be thanks Ronnie and george 1 - if indeed it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ediacara
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. then why did the go to the trouble of 9-11? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheLastMohican
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 07:38 AM Response to Reply #9 |
44. There were no nukes in Ukraine in 1998 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Didn't George cut the funds for buying up old Russian deadlies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. Right. Ho Hum. Of course, we all know who has 200-400 nuclear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Since those are for defense, what's yer point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:59 AM Response to Reply #15 |
32. So is our military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voice_of_Europe
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:57 AM Response to Reply #15 |
56. hmm... flawed logic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
14. Well perhaps if we had stay focused on the al qaeda front |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taeger
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. If a nuke was dropped on the United States |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
will work 4 food
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 10:52 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. If they had a nuke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AndyTiedye
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. BUT THAT IS JUST WHAT PNAC WANTS TO DO ANYWAY!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinistrous
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:23 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Can you spell |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PsychoDad
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:45 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Why invade the ME? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rincons land
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:56 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. because they gots the oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PsychoDad
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:05 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Oh, That's right.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
He loved Big Brother
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 05:49 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. Do you ever have anything to say besides "n/t"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:11 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. why invade the ME? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aidoneus
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:41 AM Response to Reply #16 |
29. try not to sound too eager when proposing such campaigns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:12 AM Response to Reply #16 |
35. Do you suppose the current administration would get re(?)elected then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:26 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. If it happens |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:46 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Which leads me to ask you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 05:01 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. One of my fears - which, three years ago, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 05:23 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. And Canada would be first on the list for Anschluss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voice_of_Europe
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:51 PM Response to Reply #41 |
65. Heim ins Reich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voice_of_Europe
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
62. Lashing out at everyone..? Taking over the world..? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 10:43 AM Response to Reply #62 |
82. Definitely follows Bush's pattern so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
25. Can someone help me understand this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Chicago Democrat
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
28. Why didn't they use it by now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlin
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
30. This is EXACTLY what HOWARD DEAN warned us about! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
31. Horsepucky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:21 AM Response to Reply #31 |
49. Deleted message |
Ediacara
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:34 AM Response to Reply #49 |
53. oh nevermind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinniped
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:04 AM Response to Original message |
33. The BS meter just pegged max. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
andy12
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 03:38 AM Response to Original message |
34. python |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:14 AM Response to Original message |
36. If true, it's probably missed a lot of maintanance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlant
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:08 AM Response to Reply #36 |
47. Then again, unless it's a "boosted" nuke, it probably doesn't need much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:44 AM Response to Original message |
38. been tracking the correlation since last year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 05:27 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. One question tho -- what are the "Exploding Socks"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeanmarc
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:11 AM Response to Original message |
45. Wasn't Bin Laden duped into buying phonies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Don_G
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
50. If They Can Bring It Up On The Internet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
51. I Doubt it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlant
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:31 PM Response to Reply #51 |
61. Your science is wrong in several critical ways. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:07 PM Response to Reply #61 |
77. I was trying to keep my explantion simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Atlant
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:34 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. In 1000 years, 3% of the Plutonium disappears. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 05:22 PM Response to Reply #78 |
80. It might |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Voice_of_Europe
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:49 PM Response to Reply #51 |
64. Which is the reason for the Nagasaki Bomb |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happyslug
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 05:08 PM Response to Reply #64 |
79. Dates: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slack
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
55. bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drifter
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
58. And all we have is ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
59. I believe Pakistan is made up of Al Qaeda sympathizers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guinness
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
60. This is where Bush Sr. and Clinton failed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:13 PM Response to Reply #60 |
68. Did you read any of the threads? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
71. Deleted message |
AffirmativeReaction
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:31 PM Response to Original message |
73. Is it a tactical nuke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC