|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Teaser
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:16 PM Original message |
Calpundit: Bush sent to disciplinary unit to make up AWOL time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rebellious Republican
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, thats one piece of evidence in favor of shrub shot down! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
2. Wellll....that certainly puts a Junior in the ointment, doesn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. CHECK THIS OUT!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. See where it says "Signature of Enlistee"? I wonder if ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grytpype
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. No, I think this was signed when Duhbya first enlisted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertSeattle
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Good catch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
54anickel
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 07:12 AM Response to Reply #9 |
33. Date = 23 February, 1967 from what I can see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freestatevet
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:20 AM Response to Reply #33 |
37. You are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freestatevet
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:19 AM Response to Reply #5 |
36. But he didn't enlist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:24 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Deleted message |
freestatevet
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:10 AM Response to Reply #40 |
45. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zero Gravitas
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:18 AM Response to Reply #45 |
51. he didn't go to OTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freestatevet
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:31 AM Response to Reply #51 |
53. That's my point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 03:41 PM Response to Reply #51 |
64. National Guard Timeline 1968- Nov 1969 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:04 AM Response to Reply #40 |
48. From the original Globe article in 2000: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freestatevet
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:31 AM Response to Reply #48 |
52. That doesn't make sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:02 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Timeline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freestatevet
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:06 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Your timeline is valid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 10:32 PM Response to Reply #55 |
83. Who were those 3 senior officers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlin
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:44 PM Response to Reply #36 |
58. He DID enlist -- in the Guard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freestatevet
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:49 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Okay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlin
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 03:25 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Agreed. I was drafted, then commissioned via OCS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WannaJumpMyScooter
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 10:36 PM Response to Reply #36 |
94. It is still considered an enlistment until his commission date |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Merlin
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
60. This is clearly a disciplinary warning letter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burrowowl
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Had he been anyone else |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
westcoastbias
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. What about his claim that he reported to duty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebaghwan
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
25. That doesn't make a lot of sense though does it? You get placed on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:58 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. He could have taken the physical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:33 AM Response to Reply #25 |
42. There were no F-102s in Vietnam (Did Bush crash a jet for being drunk?) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemoTex
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #42 |
71. Slight correction, IG. No F-102s in RVN when Bu$h joined the guard ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wicket
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 07:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
34. This is huge! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 10:30 PM Response to Reply #34 |
82. No it's not. It's an "I've been informed of the consequences" document, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 10:37 PM Response to Reply #82 |
84. That is the date of the directive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 08:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
35. Interesting line K on the document |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 03:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
65. In other discussion postings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 12:26 AM Response to Reply #65 |
88. Air Force Application Process |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PartyPooper
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 11:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
87. That signature is NOT the same signature from the presidential auto-pen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:07 PM Response to Reply #87 |
95. Maybe bush* is faking himself?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RobertSeattle
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. Kick - needs to be rekicked tomorrow morning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Zanti Regent
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:50 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. KICK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. Junior said today on MTP that his records were in Colorado somewhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snazzy
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
15. wow--cool pathological liar psychology. Also, CO not TX is good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
10. What the HELL kind of discipline is this???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Deleted message |
alittlelark
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:39 AM Response to Reply #13 |
26. Rincon's cruisin the posts tonight! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:33 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. The punishment is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Mon Feb-16-04 04:09 PM Response to Reply #20 |
96. Too bad it didn't happen about 1 or 2 years earlier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patriotvoice
![]() |
Sun Feb-08-04 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
11. Reference on the whole situation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
16. Another thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:24 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. first louie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:26 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Thanks for the correction... nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
66. Here is that thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnyCanuck
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:23 AM Response to Original message |
17. Freeps can't decide if to switch to panic mode or just stay in denial. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snazzy
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
21. Worked on campaign of Winton M. "Red" Blount--bio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:55 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. Fascinating info! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snazzy
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:07 PM Response to Reply #23 |
76. of course you have the assassination tie-in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lebkuchen
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
22. Thank you Michael Moore! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 01:21 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. no kidding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:26 AM Response to Reply #22 |
47. Also thank |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:53 AM Response to Original message |
27. we've known this for four years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 03:10 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Yes, we have. But the slant here is different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RapidCreek
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:15 AM Response to Reply #29 |
38. Yea this is not new at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
underpants
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:27 AM Response to Reply #38 |
41. It's going to be new to some people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:55 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. I don't think you even have to be *at* the punishment unit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:19 PM Response to Reply #43 |
67. If that is the case... then some investigation needs to happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:16 AM Response to Original message |
30. Interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
displacedtexan
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
31. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 07:10 AM Response to Original message |
32. I'm not sure at this point what this all means - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
39. Morning auto-kickery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:06 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. "as delivered to Bob Fertik in response to a FOIA request in late 2000" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robb
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:17 AM Response to Reply #44 |
50. Not clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:46 AM Response to Reply #50 |
54. Write to Bob and ask him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
46. I have a good idea for a disciplinary unit... Vietnam! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 11:13 AM Response to Reply #46 |
49. Vietnam for "The Fortunate Son"? Never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 12:09 PM Response to Reply #49 |
57. Kinda like Janet Jackson-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurtyboy
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
61. I'm just realized this much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 02:44 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. I have a good friend who pissed hot twice and still got an Honorable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. Would this be his BMT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turley
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
69. This is not a "Disciplinary" unit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 06:04 PM Response to Reply #69 |
70. It is *not* de jure a disciplinary unit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TacticalPeek
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:53 PM Response to Reply #70 |
74. 'NG discipline' . . .eewwwwww! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Turley
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 02:48 AM Response to Reply #70 |
78. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JPace
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
72. As this story stays out in front of the news.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemoTex
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 06:53 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Protection from BFEE retribution might bring them forward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JPace
![]() |
Mon Feb-09-04 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
75. The bush family seems to have keys to every file cabinet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 07:08 AM Response to Reply #75 |
80. Was Laura's vehicle accident that caused a death in Midland scrubbed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
77. Kick! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zech Marquis
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 06:52 AM Response to Original message |
79. so here it is I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 09:58 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Kick for Media Lurkers (and Media Slackers) n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big_Mike
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 11:09 PM Response to Reply #79 |
85. By what I'm reading... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scottxyz
![]() |
Tue Feb-10-04 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
86. No need to apoligize in this case for quoting a blog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 08:08 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. Good research. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 08:56 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. Lots of excellent information in these blogs - I love it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peeance Freeance
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 09:04 PM Response to Original message |
91. Pound that AWOL drum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoFerret
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 10:08 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. AWOL???....I thought it was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabels
![]() |
Sun Feb-15-04 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
92. What was the question again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC