Massachusetts Weighs a Deal on Marriages Between GaysBy PAM BELLUCK
Published: February 11, 2004
BOSTON, Feb. 10 — Seeking to counteract last week's court decision allowing gay couples to marry in Massachusetts, state lawmakers on Tuesday fashioned what they called a compromise: a proposed amendment to the state's Constitution that would define marriage as a heterosexual institution but allow same-sex couples to join in civil unions.
The compromise was developed as legislators prepared for what is likely to be a divisive constitutional convention that begins on Wednesday and is expected to be dominated by the gay-marriage question.
Lawmakers had been scheduled to consider a different amendment, one that defined marriage solely as a relationship between a man and a woman and made no mention of same-sex couples. But some legislators worried that such a measure would be interpreted to preclude civil unions.
"There were many members of the Senate who felt that amendment was punitive as opposed to being inclusive," said Ann Dufresne, a spokeswoman for Robert E. Travaglini, the Senate president.
Mr. Travaglini, a Democrat who is the presiding officer of the convention, supports civil unions. "We think the new amendment is a great bipartisan alternative that really seeks consensus," Ms. Dufresne said.
More at the
New York Times