Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army halts use of new battlefield first aid item

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 01:05 PM
Original message
Army halts use of new battlefield first aid item
Source: AP & Honolulu Advertiser

WASHINGTON (AP) — Until more testing can be done, Army medics are being told to stop using a new product just sent to the war front to help control bleeding among wounded troops.

Officials were in the process of distributing some 17,000 packets of WoundStat, granules that are poured into wounds when special bandages, tourniquets or other efforts won't work. But a recent study showed that, if used directly on injured blood vessels, the granules may lead to harmful blood clots, officials said Tuesday.

The Army Medical Command will continue its research and work with the manufacturer in hopes of figuring out in the next few months whether to resume use of WoundStat, said Col. Paul Cordts, head of Army health policy and services.

WoundStat manufacturer TraumaCure Inc., of Bethesda, Md., had no immediate comment.



Read more: http://www.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/20081223/BREAKING/81223012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why don't they do like the ancient Eqyptians and use honey?
Edited on Tue Dec-23-08 01:18 PM by acmavm
Stops bleeding and honey is an anti-bacterial agent.

Oh wait! We've killed off all the bees so there might be a supply problem, mightn't there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. i didn't know that.
i use golden seal powder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Romans were big users of honey also.
only food that doesn't spoil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. But may contain salmonella???????
Not for consumption by babies who have an immature immune system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. The lack of spoilage never ceases to amaze me (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. The ancient Eqyptians...
...didn't import half their honey from China. Fuck knows what you're spreading on your toast.


Enjoy. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I only get mine from locals.
Michigan honey's the best. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. I have to try in order to see imported honey just about anywhere
Anyplace I've lived, any of the honey in the stores has been really close to its labelled source. I'll see imports now and then but even those are usually from an adjacent province or state, not the antipodes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Didn't know that ...but how could you sell crap & WoundStat if they did know-???
Edited on Tue Dec-23-08 11:41 PM by defendandprotect
Keep 'em dumb and make $$$ --

Bushed FDA ---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rushed into production?
An investigation into the manufacturer's financial ties might prove revealing.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Valid point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I vaguely remember this stuff...
...from a paper years ago: Assuming it's the same thing, it artificially increases clotting speed, helping your body plug the leaks. If you're losing blood, even though a dressing, it'll turn the whole area into a scab in a few minutes and you can (in theory) be shuffled off to a med for proper treatment before you bleed to death.

Basically, it's a life saver.

Now it's true that if you get a limb blown off, sticking this stuff straight into the bloodstream could cause all sorts of shit: It's thrombosis in a bottle. The idea was that you apply a dressing, then the compound, then another dressing: It might be the front line troops haven't been trained enough to use it properly (Gosh, what a suprise).

Withdrawing it may well cost more lives than leaving it. But if there's a few million dollars in lawsuits to be lost, it may be cheaper to pull the stuff.

And hey, a few people will die. So what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I believe you are correct.
If it's only used in the most severe cases, then it's use it or die. It may be being used in less severe cases and that is where the problem lies I suspect.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Let them bleed out for sure or POSSIBLY cause them to throw a clot...
Seems pretty clear cut to me and I am no Doc.

Are they in such a rush they don't bother to teach basic first aid before they deploy these guys? Do they train these guys on anything any more or do they just hand them a gun, a full clip, and a sack lunch?

This is just so sad.


Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. They have basic first aid in boot camp.
There are also Combat Lifesaver Courses which teach more advanced first aid. I'd guess about 5% of guys in front line units have combat lifesaver.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hardtravelin Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. All Basic Trainees graduate as Combat Lifesavers, now.
I would suspect that the rate in line units is closer to 90%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I am glad to hear this.
After so many articles about lack of armor, problems with food supplies, and VA issues I didn't expect to hear anything positive about the level of training they are giving our guys before they send them into danger. If that extra classroom time saves ONE life it seems worth doing--ya know?

Our troops deserve every advantage we can give them, and lord knows their families back home deserve the small piece of mind that comes with knowing that there are folks there that know how to help if anything goes wrong.


Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Excellent.
It was voluntary for line guys when I taught it. Of course that was a long time ago.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hardtravelin Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. It does help with their confidence, as well
Also the new, Combat Application Tourniquet, has made a big difference with the treatment of wounded. In fact, that's pretty much what they're teaching for any serious wound, immediately apply the CAT.

I know that every Senior NCO on FT Benning that I know has to go every year and re-cert Combat Lifesaver. The full course is now every 2 years, instead of 3.

The sad thing is, we need it. I know a lot of guys who are amputees. The number you see around post is staggering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Question?
I've heard from several sources that the amputations are largely a result of IED's and not from the increased use of tourniquets. Do you have an opinion about that statement?

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hardtravelin Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yes, I agree
Edited on Thu Dec-25-08 12:52 AM by hardtravelin
My statement about the use of CAT's was in reference to the increase in survival rates due to amputation...the most common cause being IED's. In Iraq, most casualties are burn and traumatic blunt force/amputation related. This is definitely due to IED's and explosive ambushes employed by the enemy.

It is rare that we are engaged in "fire-fights." The enemy knws that is a non-starter for them. Bullet wounds are a relatively, low frequency injury.

I am not a Medic, just an Infantryman. My knowledge is completely worms-eye view and anecdotal.

Stay safe,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC