Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

60 Minutes: Mind Reading For Real

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:54 PM
Original message
60 Minutes: Mind Reading For Real
Source: Huffington Post

60 Minutes: Mind Reading For Real

Huffington Post | December 30, 2008 08:09 PM


60 Minutes has a report that seems like science fiction: mind reading for real. Neuroscientists at Carnegie Mellon University used a computer and a functional MRI to read the mind of a CBS producer.

(Watch video at this http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4691784n">link)


Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/30/60-minutes-mind-reading-f_n_154370.html



- So how long do you figure it'll be before FMRI scans become a requirement for a job application????
==============================================================================
DeSwiss


http://www.atheisttoolbox.com/">The Atheist Toolbox






"Prayer is just a way of telling god that his divine plan for
you is flawed -- and shockingly stingy" ~ Betty Bowers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. OK, I'll say it...
CBS has people with minds? That an MRI can read?

Who knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Belial Donating Member (503 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ditto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Comedian Rush Limbaugh ... is that you?
:rofl:

Welcome to DU. :hi:


I'd go light on the Ditto responses if I were you though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. She's probably....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Lovely. Employers will be checking to see if a religious region
of your brain is properly stoked. Or to see if you are thinking rude things about them. Pissing in a cup and have a swatch of hair cut off for testing isn't enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And George Orwell....
...continues to spin in his grave.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hold on guys. This is not as simple as it seems. They appear to be working with a subset of
words. And I will bet that the light/dark patterns which the subject was shown are important to the experiment, too. I.e. you may have to think the verbal word to light up your auditory cortex, the spelling of the word to get your left brain going, see the black and white image of the word in your occipital cortex and have your brain mapped doing all three record the whole thing----and then later the MRI goes back and recognizes when you do it again for the test. At least, that is the impression I got from watching the segment.

That is not mind reading. Does someone have a link to a scientific paper in which they describe what they are doing? The application for a machine like the one above would be that once it becomes familiar with one subject's brain patterns, it would be able to read some of that individual's thoughts if he limited himself to symbols that have been entered into the computer. Maybe if all brains are similar, after it analyzed a whole bunch of brains it might be able to begin to read random brains----and maybe not. I am betting that there are lots of individual variations in how things are coded. Also, the mistakes that you would get from this kind of crude information would be huge. Like "kitten" for "thermonuclear devise".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I would agree....
...that the use now is limited, but then it seems they've just gotten started. Here are a couple of links that I found on the subject that might shed more light.

http://deception.crimepsychblog.com/?p=306

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11117-can-a-brain-scan-prove-youre-telling-the-truth.html

PS - McCamy, I love your journal thread on toxic coal ash. ;) I sent the link to several friends. I live in TN, but wasn't directly affected. At least not yet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. So....
can it tell me what I'm thinking about what I'd like to do with associate producer Meagan?

:P :evilgrin: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, I'll bet....
...its not about giving her an fMRI!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-30-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. They tried it on me.
It said I was crazy.

But, I don't think they needed a machine for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. I wonder how accurate it is, if its nearly 100% foolproof then
I wonder if courts will begin to allow it so as to verify the honesty of a witness on the stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Or a suspect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'd be more impressed if they had let one of the CBS people write down the objects
to be shown to the scannee instead of allowing the researchers to give her their list.

Nonetheless, this shit is scary. When will we stop with our attempts to figure out everything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. hook it up to someone on Fox, bet $10 nothing happens,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC