Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Geithner failed to pay personal taxes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:11 PM
Original message
Geithner failed to pay personal taxes
Source: AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — President-elect Barack Obama's choice to run the Treasury Department and lead the economic rescue effort disclosed publicly Tuesday that he failed to pay $34,000 in taxes from 2001 to 2004, a last-minute complication in an otherwise smooth path to confirmation.

Timothy Geithner paid most of the past-due taxes days before Obama announced his nomination in November, according to materials released by the Senate Finance Committee. He had paid the remainder of the taxes in 2006, after the IRS sent him a bill.

The still-unpaid taxes were discovered by Obama's transition team while investigating Geithner's background.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus said he still hoped Geithner could be confirmed on Inauguration Day. Obama's staff told senators about Geithner's tax issues Dec. 5.



Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hj1yF_ptG-7vosxFrnx7fysb3IdgD95MGTMG1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just read a good recap here-
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_01/016427.php

Appears to be much todo over nothing. Even the Republicans appear to be inclined to overlook it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. Thanks..
<snip from your link>

"At this point, I'd be surprised if anything came of this. We're talking about infractions that a) are minor; b) Geithner addressed and corrected; and c) he made no effort to conceal. It'll take considerable effort for Republicans and Fox News to gain traction with this."

It doesn't take much around here.. just a headline from AP.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
52. Which probably means that plenty of them owe back taxes, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paul Giulani Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. As Treasury Secy, Geithner will be boss of IRS...
So he could pardon himself. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. He wasnt a great choice anyway, too close to the DLC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a simple mistake. It looks as if he included his money from
working with the IMF as income thinking that it wasn't covered under the Self-Emplouyment taxes, individuals Social Security and Medicare. He paid income tax but not the self employment tax...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Shouldn't a candidate for Treasury Secretary have known this?
It seems like kind of a big deal to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. You made me laugh out loud. Except I don't think you intended to.
Yeah, if this is what passes for the excuse-of-the-day, it's an unusually sorry one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
42. It's kind of a really obscure part of the tax code...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #42
50. Paying taxes on consulting income is an obscure law? Turns out that I'm a tax expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
54. When you're so rich that $34,000 of taxes doesn't get noticed...
you basically think you're going to get away with breaking the law. If they confirm this guy, what does that say about people who deliberately cheat on their taxes...that its not a big deal, as long as you pay up when you're caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JFKfanforever Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
64. Yes, it is a big deal... The Fed wants to run the Treasury as well.
Congress should disqualify him if he does not have the decency
to resign...

Have a look at how the general public is enraged by Tim's
"honest mistake" (ha! ha!).  Their arguments are
strong and make very interesting reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. The IMF is a fucking DISGRACE and I would really rather anyone who worked for them
stay far away from Obama....however that is quite a pipe dream, I know :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. The DlC is what qualified him
We're homogenized now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds qualified to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. snort
that made me LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
37. GMFAO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't know why people are excusing this...
if he was going to be appointed for something like EPA or whatever, ok fine, I could understand people giving him a pass on "oops" but fer crissakes you want to put a man who can't keep his taxes straight in charge of the gigantic bureaucratic machine that is the Treasury Department?!

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. At first I thought this inane post was sarcasm or satire. Sadly it was not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. how lovely that all you can offer is insults instead of actually discussing the meat of the article
how sad for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. It just goes to show
if a potential Secretary of the Treasury can't get his taxes straight, maybe just maybe the tax code is too complicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. well that's an entirely separate concern, and I do think tax code is ridiculous...
however, millions of regular people figure it out fine. I'm sorry if I have lofty expectations that a Cabinet level presidential appointment to head policy directly related to taxation should have his own taxes in line. I know, color me crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
machI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Millions of regular people pay good money to figure it out
Last week I plopped down my $29.95 for Tax software. I've had to do this for the last five years.

(I actually pay for my software. I don't bootleg it like a lot of folks do.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Does TurboTax ask if you work for the IMF?
I used to do taxes, and at the Enrolled Agent level. I even sat for the Tax Court exam in 1982, and I had no idea about this. This is a non-issue, the IRS audited, he accepted their conclusions, and paid up.

The tax code is WAY too complicated, full of loopholes all over the place that the rich use to avoid paying their fair share. If Geithner had worked as an employee for another firm at the same time, and paid the max into SS and Medicare, he wouldn't have owed this money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. I think it's the fact that he was Consulting at the IMF during the Bush years.
This has a lot of people surprised, including me, and I don't have good things to say about what the IMF does, or what they stand for.

It's kind of like Mark Penn lobbying for Columbia while managing the Campaign for Democrat Hillary Clinton.


BTW, Columbia is the third largest recipient of funds after Israel...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #32
68. Co-lombia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
59. I pay about $300 a year for an H&R Block tax preparer to do my
return, and I make just $40,000/year. But a small part of that comes from self-employment (tutoring and editing), so of course it gets complicated. I would do my taxes myself if I could manage it, but I have tried and I can't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Yeah, good reason to not pay taxes -- it's too complicated!
Thanks for the free pass on not paying taxes.

Sadly, it didn't work for Geithner, nor would it work for you or me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiranon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hmmm. Would like more info and why IRS waived penalties and
does the IRS usually waive penalties in these situations. In other words, can all similarly situated people have their penalties waived as well? Or refunded?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
66. The ordinary citizen
Isn't going to be told a failure to pay taxes is a minor infraction.

When my company only had one full time and one part time employee, I paid employment taxes quarterly when I filed my 941s. One quarter I went over the limit by $7.00 and got dinged 10% on the full amount. The IRS doesn't care than I didn't know I'd go over by just a few dollars, they penalized me over $200 for not depositing monthly even though I'd never been required to do it in the past.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Happened to me because of my accountants advice.
Edited on Tue Jan-13-09 05:25 PM by Seldona
It is all rather complex mumbo jumbo few understand, even fewer well, that caused my snaffu with the IRS. Seems one of our products, for reasons that sounded plausable at the time, was not taxable. Or so our accounant told us.

Three years later the IRS informed us differently and, with a new accountant in tow, we proceeded to watch the IRS gut our business. Shit happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. that's fine, but you're not in line to oversee the Treasury Department
and help oversee one of the largest disbursal of public funds in US (world?) history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Harry Truman was a failed businessman and proved to be a sound executive.
That's really kind of an irrelevant statement on your part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. your comment is pretty irrelevant too
I would expect someone who wants to jump in as head of Treasury have a pretty fundamental knowledge of how taxes work. Hell, I did 3 months of contract work when I was 19 and I figured out how to file a fucking 1040.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
63. Self delete.
Edited on Wed Jan-14-09 03:22 PM by LanternWaste
Self delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. And George W. Bush was a C student. I thought we'd moved into better territory.
I don't want incompetent - and criminal - people running the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. No.
But as I was trying to point out it can happen quite innocently. It is taken care of.

:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. Yep, nothing to see here, move on
I want to know more about hiis involvemnet with the IMF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. In this case, it appears he did his own taxes
"The punchline to this whole imbroglio is this: The tax returns that contained the mistakes? Geithner did them himself."
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/economy-watch/2009/01/geither_meets_with_senators_ov.html?hpid=topnews

In any event, FICA and SECA are pretty straightforward, not complex mumbo jumbo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
62. Have you done quarterly returns with capital gains
Edited on Wed Jan-14-09 03:04 PM by Seldona
as well as other business income? I am incredibly good with a few things, okay with a few more, and the rest I wrote checks to professionals whom I trusted. My mistake. In my case as well taxes were owed, as well as penalties and interest. Didn't make me a criminal, even in the government's eyes.

While they wanted their money, they as least recognized we weren't tax cheats. I hope that is the case here, but I have never stated it is. I support full disclosure and if anything improper is found than by all means have at it.

I am sorry I shared my experience. I will not make the same mistake again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
55. Did you get your penalties waived? I thought the IRS was obligated by law to collect every
dime, so long as the taypayer had assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. Nope.
Nor interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. Its pretty simple that if employer does not do FICA withholdings, then you got to pay SECA tax
What's not to understand? How could a financial professional miss this for four years running?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. I don consulting on the side and I'm well aware that I owe taxes on my consulting income.
That's small business 101. And no, I'm not an accountant. But any accountant will tell any consultant that they have to declare their consulting income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. Huh? I see this a total disqualification for Geithner.
Edited on Tue Jan-13-09 05:58 PM by robcon
Would it be ok for the Secretary of the interior to have a toxic waste site on his/her property? Paying taxes on time is a minimum to be expected from a Secretary of the Treasury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
48. that crook paulson was given his $600 mil or whatever tax free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
23. "Only little people pay taxes" - Leona Helmsley
Edited on Tue Jan-13-09 05:56 PM by L0oniX
I know this is going to make little people very angry ...pffft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
machI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. Looks like the Republican Slime Machine is fixin' to go into overdrive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I'm not sure why this is a "Republican slime" issue
I'm a big lefty and think failure to pay federal social security witholding for four years is reason enough to disqualify Geithner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. Disqualify him. There are MUCH better qualified people. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
28. Oh, Come ON. Enough "Short Cuts" Administrators
and also an immigrant housekeeper who worked for Geithner for several months without the proper employment documentation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. I was unaware of his link to the IMF -- He should step down now like Richardson.
The IMF uses money to impose it's will and put poor countries into the debt spiral.

The IMF is a fancy name for "Economic Hitman" Just look at what it did to Jamaica in the 70's.

Another Obama dissappointment, poor choice, Blue Dog DLC good ole boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamidue Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. That's not all.
He is also a Bilderberger and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Yep
He and Hillary Clinton attended a Bilderberg meeting this past June.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. But if you mentioned the IMF to one hundred average Americans
You'd get 96 or 97 responses ranging from "huh?" to "so what?" to "sounds like good experience". It's not a hot button for people who don't mind Rick Warren delivering the invocation, and they at least know what gay marriage is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
44. Senator Byron Dorgan:Federal Reserve Refuses To Identify Recipients Of 2 Trillion In Emergency Loans
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=257863&mesg_id=257863

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_F._Geithner


Unless I am mistaken, the president of the NY Fed sits on this board...

"...The Federal Reserve Board, they are refusing to identify the recipients of almost $2 trillion of assistance backed emergency loans from American taxpayers. They refuse to identify the troubled assets they are accepting as collateral. The Federal Reserve opened it window for the first time in history to noninsured banks. They have all kinds of programs now to move money out. I understand there is an urgency here, but I do not understand why the American taxpayers are told: By the way, you are the guarantor of a lot of these debts, you are going to pick up the pieces, and you are going to pay for it, but we are not going to tell you what it is we are doing. Mr. President, $2 trillion of emergency loans for troubled assets and they say: You don't deserve to know. We are not going to tell you.

In fact, Bloomberg, the news organization, had to sue the Federal government to try to get details about the total has gone out in terms of guarantees and capital which, by the way, is over $8 trillion. It does not mean we are going to lose all that. My point is, why should a news organization have to sue the Government in order to give the American people some information about how much they are on the hook for with all of this emergency activity?..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JFKfanforever Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #44
47. End the stranglehold of the Fed, a private cartel...
Return all monetary governance and control to the govrnment of
the USA, for example the Treasury.

Disqualify GEITHNER (because he has disqualified himself by
filing the ethical litmus test for a cabinet position) and
choose someone who has no trailing bilical cord to the Fed (or
the IMF or the World Bank or any think tank)or to any major
Wall Street firms or to Fannie/Freddie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. That will not happen any time soon, it would be nice if someone
asked Geitner about the two trillion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RCinBrooklyn Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
45. I know I have to pay FICA taxes. He's the expert and doesn't? He should withdraw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-13-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
46. Charlie Gibson did not sound like a real journalist when he "reported " this story tonight
He sounded like Bill O'Reilly on a rant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acadia Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
51. I support Obama but this man should not have this job if he is too
greedy not to pay his taxes. OMG the man is rich. I am sick of these priviledged parasites. Find someone honest.
Obama, we need a clean change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
53. k and r. He should step down. We don't need another dlc'er
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
56. So, if you have an undocumented alien working for you, you can
Edited on Wed Jan-14-09 12:47 PM by No Elephants
run the INS? If you paid your nanny, cleaning woman or gardener under the table, you can be Secretary of Labor?

Man, I've been way too much of a goody two shoes to get anywhere in government. I gotta go break me some laws.

Now, that's change I can believe in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
57. OK, but he's square with the house now right? So why all the fuss?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
58. Disqualify him.
I find this completely unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lagomorph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
60. Since he's choosing our experts...
I'd feel more confident with someone who is more tax saavy than Geithner.

I'd try to choose experts who have proven they are always on top of the subject.

There's probably a few hundred DU'ers who would have got Geithner's taxes right, pick one of them.

I mean, if you want to run Treasury, you should at least be able to do your taxes!!!

Am I wrong?!?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
67. Geithner also was reimbursed for these payments by the IMF.
This is starting to sound pretty bad. Not only didn't he pay the self-employment tax, but he was accepting reimbursement payments from the IMF to make the payments. The IMF also took great care to point out they weren't taking out these taxes.

Geithner was also audited for 2003 and 2004 and forced to pay the SE tax for those years well before nomination. It's only the 2001 and 2002 years that Geithner paid when his non-payment was caught by the Obama team.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/13/geithner-choice-for-treasury-questioned-on-his-tax-returns/?apage=8

Yeee-uch. First Richardson and now Geithner is probably going down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
69. We don't need a tax cheat, or sloppy tax filer, running the IRS.
Edited on Thu Jan-15-09 09:48 AM by robcon
NYT editorial...

More Questions for Mr. Geithner
Published: January 14, 2009

"....As much as Mr. Obama and his team may wish it, however, the disclosures cannot be dismissed so easily, or papered over. The just-the-facts report of Mr. Geithner’s tax transgressions, compiled and released by the Senate Finance Committee, paints a picture of noncompliance that is considerably more disturbing than his supporters are acknowledging.

Mr. Geithner must be questioned forcefully about these matters at the hearing next week, and his explanations must be credible. Even in the best of economic times, it would be hard to accept a Treasury secretary — who, after all, is in charge of the Internal Revenue Service — with a cavalier attitude toward paying his taxes. Today, in a time of economic peril, the nation cannot afford a Treasury secretary with a tainted ability to command respect and instill confidence....

...Obama officials say Mr. Geithner, who worked for the International Monetary Fund, had made a common error among international employees in Washington. But as The Journal reported on Wednesday, failing to pay the self-employment tax is not necessarily common among sophisticated I.M.F employees. Rather, one of the reasons such noncompliance is widespread is that it includes household embassy workers and other lower- level contractors. And regardless, the Finance Committee found that Mr. Geithner had signed paperwork at the I.M.F. that acknowledged his self-employment tax obligation.

The story does not stop there. Mr. Geithner also failed to pay the self-employment tax in 2001 and 2002. Those returns, which the report says Mr. Geithner prepared himself, were not audited and so the I.R.S. did not order him to pay up — which raises the question of why he did not voluntarily amend those returns and pay the taxes and interest at the time of the 2006 audit. Instead, he waited until after vetting by the Obama team late last year revealed the shortfall — $19,176 in taxes and $6,794 in interest.

A similar lapse occurred on another tax issue. On returns for 2001, 2004 and 2005, Mr. Geithner wrongly claimed expenses for sleep-away camps in calculating his dependent care tax credit. The accountant who prepared his 2006 return informed him that payments to overnight camps were not allowable expenses, but again, he did not file amended returns for the previous years at that time. The report does not break out the taxes and interest on that item alone, but along with other adjustments, Mr. Geithner owed an additional tax of $4,334 and interest of $1,232.

Many people find taxes baffling, but before his job at the I.M.F, Mr. Geithner was a senior official in the Treasury Department under President Clinton, and for the past five years he has been the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. With that professional profile, tax transgressions are tough to excuse.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/opinion/15thu1.html?_r=1&th&emc=th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC