Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Franken proposes quicker trial than Coleman seeks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 08:52 PM
Original message
Franken proposes quicker trial than Coleman seeks
Source: Star Tribune

Democrat Al Franken wants Coleman's legal challenge to the Senate recount to begin on Jan. 26 and last 15 days, an earlier start and shorter schedule than Coleman suggested.
By MIKE KASZUBA, Star Tribune staff writer
Last update: January 15, 2009 - 2:53 PM

Democrat Al Franken’s campaign today described a trial schedule proposed by Republican Norm Coleman as “rather leisurely” and instead proposed starting Coleman’s legal challenge in the U.S. Senate race on Jan. 26 and have it last 15 days.

Continuing what has been almost a daily back-and-forth between the two campaigns, Franken attorney Marc Elias said Coleman’s plan to start the trial Feb. 9 was a sign that Coleman would use the contest to try to uncover evidence that might swing more votes his way — as opposed to offering evidence the campaign already has that a recount approved by the state Canvassing Board was flawed. “They have a theory but they do not have a case,” Elias said in a conference call with reporters today.

“Now, with the new Senate addressing the Nation’s urgent business, Coleman still is not entirely sure what his case is about, so he proposes multiple trials that would begin on February 2, 9 and 16,” said a nine-page legal document filed by Franken.

On Wednesday, Coleman proposed separating the trial into five stages, with the first stage focusing on rejected absentee ballots, and indicated he might cut the trial short if any stage did not produce a “sufficient number of votes” needed to overcome Franken’s 225-vote lead ...


Read more: http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/37656934.html?elr=KArksD:aDyaEP:kD:aU2EkP7K_t:aDyaEP:kD:aUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUU



It’s a Trial Date Tango in Minnesota
By Emily Cadei, CQ Staff

... In Franken’s scheduling proposal, his legal team said the Coleman schedule “starts too late” and “takes too long.”

The trial, his attorneys wrote, “should take a maximum of three weeks,” and it should begin by Jan. 26. Minnesota law gives the court 20 days from the time an election challenge was filed to begin the trial. Coleman filed suit on Jan. 6.

The two campaigns are to meet Friday morning with the three-judge panel that will hear the case to discuss scheduling ...

Individual Minnesotans are also now jumping into the legal fray. On Jan. 13, 64 voters filed suit with the state Supreme Court claiming their absentee ballots were improperly rejected. The majority are reportedly Franken voters, and the Franken campaign said it is supporting, but is not party to the case. And Jan. 14, a group of Republican responded by announcing they would ask to join Coleman’s challenge, claiming they were disenfranchised because some votes were counted twice.

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003011687

Franken wants simple format for Senate challenge
By PATRICK CONDON

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — ... "We believe Norm Coleman has the right to go to court. We don't believe he has a right to use the process of going to court to delay the people of Minnesota having a new senator as soon as possible," Franken attorney Marc Elias said ...

Franken's court filing suggested the Coleman model would "take too long" and be "burdensome and inefficient." Multiple stages to the trial would force local election officials, some from far-flung parts of the state, to travel to St. Paul numerous times to testify instead of getting it all done in one trip, Franken's lawyer said.

Knaak said the two campaigns had been summoned to meet Friday morning with the panel, to discuss their timetable proposals and other issues concerning the trial. He said he didn't expect an immediate decision from the judges ...

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gMpTmr96V5hKIfyHT4Av4jsVQgrQD95NSJDG2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is Coleman considered a former Senator right now?
after all, the new senate was sworn in and his race is still to be decided, and chances are it will be decided in Frankens favor. So, Coleman is not a US Senator, or is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Former Senator at this phase...
The office he used has been locked-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Obviously Coleman thinks he can keep it if he squats long enough.
Just another delusional, moronic Repuke - and a really sore loser to boot.

However, the Republics are, by example, one hella teaching tool for the little ones - but to make the lesson complete, there need to be consequences for every sleazy and illegal action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. All of this machination and wrangling will make the end result burn that much more.
I hope Norm Coleman bursts into tears on nationwide television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. his term expired. i think they are in limbo now. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. coleman is a slimeball
and a sore looser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. They should go with Franken's suggestion of a couple of weeks ago
Seat him on a provisional basis so MN has 2 senators.
Then once the courts rule in his favor it can be official

I find it interesting that a man (Coleman) who has been whining about how his constituents are not being represented fully, does not support this.

What Coleman really wants is to be sitting in the senate getting paid for doing nothing useful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Norm is in denial. Can't accept reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnpaul Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. The law is the law
The trial is to start no later than 20 days after the filing. The makes for a Jan 26 start date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe Normie would leave faster if he got a few shoes flung at him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. Norm, you're a...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC