Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush approves Peru trade pact, despite objections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 06:43 PM
Original message
Bush approves Peru trade pact, despite objections
Source: Reuters


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush put into effect a free trade agreement with Peru on Friday, despite concerns raised by Democrats and labor groups about whether Peru had fulfilled all of its labor obligations.

"Today's proclamation marks an important milestone in our relationship with Peru, one of our strongest allies in Latin America," U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab said in a statement after Bush issued the order.

The action makes Peru the 17th free trade partner of the United States and the 14th country added to that list since Bush took office eight years ago. Two-way trade between the United States and Peru is about $9.4 billion annually.

Top Democrats on the House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee raised concerns earlier this week that Peru had backtracked on important labor commitments and asked Bush not to implement the agreement before he leaves office on Tuesday.



Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE50F74G20090116



Barracks Gold has a big gold mine in Peru. If anybody's interested in what's really going on. "Making money for my family right up to very last minute"

CHA CHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right up to the last second of his last fucking day in office, this man will
screw over the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-16-09 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. and the knees jerk blind - the US has a growing TRADE SURPLUS with Peru
That means we EXPORT more to Peru than we IMPORT from Peru, so by all means lets give Lima a big fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. By all means, we owe them! And don't forget pollution king, Ira Rennert,
Edited on Sat Jan-17-09 05:00 AM by Judi Lynn
who runs a poisonous company in a canyon in Peru which traps all the poisonous air and poisons the river running through it, who owns the largest private house in the United States, after a lifetime of pollution.

Here are photos of his house, and the Peruvian blighted town he has poisoned, in one of the 10 worst polluted areas in the world, La Oroya, Peru:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3558450

Live it up, Rennert, you asshole!



Where Rennert throws his hat.



Lucky, lucky poor people of Peru. What a life, working for Rennert.

The book cover says, "There's a place in the world where birds
don't fly, trees and children don't grow, and lead is the bread of
each day."

On edit, adding YouTube video:
"House of Lead: A story of greed" - La Oroya, Peru
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpwu8DOmzoU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
4.  Bush go-ahead to Peru trade deal sparks criticism
Posted on Friday, 01.16.09
Bush go-ahead to Peru trade deal sparks criticism
By ANDREW WHALEN
Associated Press Writer

LIMA, Peru -- President George W. Bush signed off Friday on a free trade pact with Peru that U.S. officials say will foster economic growth, but which lawmakers in both countries complain does not meet environmental and labor protection requirements.

In a statement issued in Washington, where Bush signed a proclamation enacting the pact on Feb. 1, U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab called trade expansion "a vital component of our effort to restore economic growth in the global economy."

Free trade agreements have been a hallmark of the Bush administration but the Democrat-led U.S. Congress only approved the Peru pact in December 2007 - 20 months after it was signed - following Peru's agreement to strengthen laws protecting trade unions and the environment.

Bush's move on Friday, four days before he leaves office, met with a chorus of complaints from both countries.

Opposition lawmakers in Peru complained chiefly that President Alan Garcia has failed to honor the stricter environmental standards, permitting legal loopholes that they say could endanger the country's Amazon rain forest.

Along with environmentalists, they say a newly amended forestry law backed by Garcia will allow large swaths of rain forest to be converted into biofuel projects if they are deemed "a matter of national interest."

"The new law means 70 percent of the Amazon runs the risk of deforestation," Roger Najar, who heads Congress' indigenous caucus, told The Associated Press. He said Garcia signed a January 2008 decree that deemed the development of sugar cane and bamboo plantations in the national interest.

More:
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/americas/AP/story/857652.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC