|
That was my favorite fantasy punishment for Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld. With electronic thingees on their ankles, and constant surveillance.
They might not be too safe, though, in Veterans' hospitals. Even gravely wounded vets have more courage in whatever body parts they have left, than could be found in the entirety of the Bushwack government, so I'm not sure we could guarantee continued life--and continued punishment and recompense--for that crew. And I would want it to continue.
As for the financial ratfuckers, I stand corrected. Jobs as janitors and maids--even if the janitors and maids were raised to CEO--is, well, an insult to janitors and maids, for one thing, and the Jaguar crowd would be lousy at it, for sure, resulting in garbage and health hazards everywhere. I didn't mean to insult anyone. I've been a housekeeper myself. I only meant to point out the Mt. Everest-sized discrepancy in competence and salary. The ratfuckers should be getting $8 an hour, and the people who actually work, and create all the wealth--with their know-how, their smarts and their altruism--should be running things.
I've read a story--sorry, I don't have a url handy--about when Argentine got "shocked and awed" a few years ago, and factories and businesses were simply abandoned by their owners--of the workers taking the business over, and keeping it going--successfully. Examples were a tile factory, and a hotel. The ratfucking banks and financial barricudas tried to stop them. They prefer idle businesses! But I think the workers held on, and eventually triumphed. Not sure of their most recent status. One of the things that happened is that LEFTISTS were elected to run the government--Nestor Kirchner, and recently (when his term limit kicked in), his wife, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner. And they would be likely to have helped resolve any legal issues.
But anyway, the story stayed in my head. Never thought WE would be in that spot. And here we are. Goods and services cannot be moved, because the financial scum prefer idle businesses. Probably to break the back of the work force, and kill good wages and benefits, pensions, Social Security and whatever else they can kill (as they did in Argentina).
Argentina recovered, by the way--with a strong leftist government, and some help from Venezuela (easy term loans, so Argentina could pay off its onerous World Bank/IMF debt; barters, like oil for beef, etc.--the seed of the Bank of the South--regional control of development financing, with social justice goals).
But the Bushwhacks* have arranged things so that there is no bailout for us, and no friends to bail us out, even if it could be done. And it's no wonder that they hate Hugo Chavez with a hatred bordering on psychosis, for his wise and progressive policy of helping his neighbors and seeing to the general economic welfare of the region. It's not just his 60% approval rating, and Venezuela's honest elections, and the Chavez government's socking away $40 billion in international cash reserves for a rainy day (meaning Venezuela will land on its feet, social programs in tact), that they hate him for. And they don't just stoke up hatred for him in a phony way, because they have bloody designs on Venezuela's oil. No, the hatred is genuine, and it's because he believes in fairness, and, what is more, has taken effective action to achieve it.
Above all, they don't want fairness. And they're willing to shut down the United States of America to keep it from ever gaining a foothold here again.
--------------
*(And it's not just the Bushwhacks. It's the Wall Street Journal. It's The Economist. It's the Washington Post. It's the New York Times. And brethren. And it's the DLC and their ilk, the "Blue Dog" Democrats. (You know who was the biggest "Blue Dog" of them all? Gary Condit.) They all hate, loathe, revile and constantly lie about Hugo Chavez, because they are in mortal fear of We, the People, in the north, getting any idea that government should serve us, and not the Super-rich.)
|