Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama caps executive pay tied to bailout money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:07 PM
Original message
Obama caps executive pay tied to bailout money
Source: Associated Press


Feb 4, 11:56 AM EST

Obama caps executive pay tied to bailout money

By JIM KUHNHENN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Barack Obama on Wednesday imposed $500,000 caps on senior executive pay for the most distressed financial institutions receiving federal bailout money, saying Americans are upset with "executives being rewarded for failure."

Obama announced the dramatic new government intervention into corporate America at the White House, with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner at his side. The president said the executive-pay limits are a first step, to be followed by the unveiling next week of a sweeping new framework for spending what remains of the $700 billion financial industry bailout that Congress created last year.

The executive-pay move comes amid a national outcry over huge bonuses to executives heading companies seeking taxpayer dollars to remain afloat. The demand for limits was reinforced by revelations that Wall Street firms paid more than $18 billion in bonuses in 2008 even amid the economic downturn and the massive infusion of taxpayer dollars.

"This is America. We don't disparage wealth. We don't begrudge anybody for achieving success," Obama said. "But what gets people upset - and rightfully so - are executives being rewarded for failure. Especially when those rewards are subsidized by U.S. taxpayers."

Read more: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BAILOUT_EXECUTIVE_PAY?SITE=SCGRE&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT



Excellent Mr. President and a looong time coming!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. This may be the most popular thing he ever does.
Unless, of course, he comes across with single payer universal health care. Ending the Iraq War and closing Guantanamo will be nice...but we'll remember him cutting the CEOs off at the greedy knees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And rightfully so.
Regardless of how tuned in one is or isn't most people understand unbridled greed. Emptying the trough is the only way to get the pigs to remove their snouts. My profound apologies to all four-legged hogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. It's a start, now for a national maximum wage, pegged to the
minimum wage or lowest paid employee at each company. Say 10 to 1 for a start and see how it works out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. It will be interesting to see if Obama's action holds up in court. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatchWhatISay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. If they take it to court, fine
Their bailout can be put on hold, and then denied if they prevail. I dont think the courts can force the administration to give them a bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Congress must pass the bill appropriating money for the bailout so it depends upon whether it allows
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 05:59 PM by jody
a president to deny bailout unilaterally by adding restrictions not provided for in the bill, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Wow. You bat 1.000, don't ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. ceo pay is out of control
Executive Excess (PDF); comparing the pay of top CEOs to average workers.

http://faireconomy.org/files/executive_excess_2008.pdf

Worker Pay versus Executive Pay
Last year, average CEO pay rose 2.6 percent to $10,544,470, according to an Associated Press survey of S&P 500 firms.1 That’s 344 times the pay of an average American worker.2 The gap between CEOs and minimum wage workers runs even wider. In 2007, CEOs averaged 866 times as much as minimum wage employees.

Private investment managers continue to push U.S. business leader paychecks off the charts. Last year, the top 50 hedge and private equity fund managers earned an average of $588 million, according to Alpha magazine.3 That’s more than 19,000 times as much as average worker pay.

2007 Compensation of the Top Five Highest-Paid Private Investment Fund Managers and CEOs

Private Investment Fund Managers Public Company CEOs John Paulson, Paulson & Co. $3.7 billion John Thain, Merrill Lynch $83 million George Soros, Soros Fund Management $2.9 billion Leslie Moonves, CBS $68 million James Simons, Renaissance Technologies $2.8 billion Richard Adkerson, Freeport-McMoran $65 million Philip Falcone, Harbinger Partners $1.7 billion Bob Simpson, XTO Energy $57 million Kenneth Griffin, Citadel Investment Group $1.5 billion Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs $54 million

Sources: Private investment funds: Alpha magazine. CEOs: Associated Press.

The tax loopholes we examine in this year’s Executive Excess have, in some cases, sat lodged in our tax code for many years. But the exploiting of these loopholes — for executive personal aggrandizement — is a much more recent phenomenon, a development that has intensified only since the early 1980s.

What has changed on the American economic scene, over the last three decades, to make
these loopholes so exploitable? Economic power, to put the matter most simply, has concentrated in America’s executive suites. The mid 20th century checks and balances of our economic system — the building blocks of post-World War II American middle class prosperity — have been swept away.

The most important of these checks and balances: a vital trade union presence in the private sector. A half-century ago, over one-third of American private sector workers belonged to unions. Bargaining between these workers and their employers set wage patterns throughout the U.S. economy, in both organized and unorganized workplaces, and served to restrain executive rewards at the top of the corporate ladder.

Today, according to the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics survey data, only 7.4 percent of private-sector workers belong to unions. Top executives, at the vast majority of America’s workplaces, face no institutional challenge from their workers. The absence of that challenge leaves executives free to pocket rewards at levels that would have seemed recklessly greedy only a generation ago.

Recent academic research has demonstrated the executive pay difference that a union presence can make. In one survey, released last year, researchers found that CEOs at nonunion companies take home nearly 20 percent more than their fellow executives in unionized firms.4 Workers in union companies, meanwhile, make $200 more a week than their counterparts in nonunion firms, $863 a week for union employees, only $663 weekly for their nonunion counterparts.5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Now that is how you put some smack down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. "being rewarded for failure" ... well, what pisses ME off more is ...
.... being rewarded excessively simply because of the office they sit in.
Being rewarded excessively based on how many jobs they can cut in a year.
Being rewarded excessively when they leave the company they've steered toward oblivion.

Need I continue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Maybe we can coin a phrase... Being given the Bush medal of excess
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here's the video of him announcing it... K&R
President Obama Imposes $500,000 Salary Cap for Bail Out Executives
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x268206
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. This should be passable, I can imagine it would be a party line vote.
The Republicans would of course vote in favor of the CEO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Obama to CEOS: You can still live a fabulously wealthy lifestyle on taxpayer $$$
Edited on Wed Feb-04-09 05:21 PM by Romulox
but you won't be able to live like Kings any more!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. I love the smell of socialism in the morning ! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. Wow! Just wow...
If this isn't change then what is?

Everyone needs to stop for a minute and really take this in. This has to be the most outstanding executive order any President has done. I am amazed at the 'audacity' of this action. Amazed because it's actually the right thing to do for the times. Let them go back to their greed when the economy is stable and solid. But not right now.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC