Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report finds TARP at risk of fraud

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:54 AM
Original message
Report finds TARP at risk of fraud
Source: The Hill

The special inspector general for the $700 billion financial bailout package said the program is at risk of fraud in his first report to Congress.
In a 188-page report delivered to Congress on Thursday, Neil Barofsky raised specific concerns about the potential for fraud in the Term Asset-Backed Loan Facility (TALF), a program run jointly by the Federal Reserve and Treasury that is set to being later this month.

.....

Barofsky said taxpayers are at risk of fraud because of the way private institutions can post collateral under the program. The Treasury Department should not participate in the program, he said, until there are safeguards and prevention mechanisms. Participants in the program could fraudulently overvalue the collateral and then walk away, thereby leaving the federal government with the cost.

Barofsky is set to appear before the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday to testify about the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), as the financial rescue package is formally known.
In his report, Barofsky raises additional general concerns about TARP and is seeking better accounting from companies that have received government aid about how they have used the money.

“The long-term success of the program is not assured,” Barofsky said in the report.

.....

Read more: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/report-finds-tarp-at-risk-of-fraud-2009-02-05.html



Nevermind the millions who called Congress to demand strict regulation and oversight before passing Hank Paulson's bank bailout. We are just the focus group rabble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. No Fing Kidding!?
goosh who would have thought?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. My reaction too.
Duh. Almost zero oversight and won't even say where the money went. Whoulda thunk there might be some sticky fingers reaching in there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. "at risk of"?
try "designed for"

You put together a program that hands a mind-boggling amount of money with zero strings attached and zero accountability and allow both the givers and recipients to disclose nothing... what do you honestly expect to happen? That the same group of people who can't keep their spending appetites in check enough to balance the budget are all of a sudden going to become scrupulous stewards of the public treasury?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sheesh!
A little slow aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Procecute for fraud. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. BREAKING: Report finds that water is wet.
Edited on Thu Feb-05-09 11:01 AM by Mika
:dunce:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Paulsen + Bush = fraud
no surprise here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is my shocked face
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. LOL LOL LOL! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. That's what happens when you give away so much $$$$
so fast.

I understand most of the objectives of what Obama & team wants for their $$$$$$$$4 bill, but rushing that, also seems FOOL-HARDY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I think the OP was reffering to the first part of TARP by traitor bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. It's like putting out a huge pile of cheese and being surprised when rats and mice show up
Cats rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Since it was created to be FRAUD
HELLOoooooooooooooo!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Duh! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. To quote Zazzoo - "Oh, now THERE'S a surprise. I'm gonna have a HEART ATTACK from THAT surprise."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pjt7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The really sad part of the great Paulson bank robbery
(robbing people for the banks) was more Democrats voted for that stink of sh%t, than Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yea I have no explation for that. I dont like establishment Dems too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. All you'd have to do is look at the Wall Street money behind the Dems.
Edited on Thu Feb-05-09 03:32 PM by chill_wind


Securities & Investment: Top Donars and Top Recipients-- 2008


Organization Amount Dems Repubs

1 Goldman Sachs $5,541,651 76% 24%
2 Morgan Stanley $3,482,677 59% 41%
3 UBS AG $2,887,772 56% 44%
4 Merrill Lynch $2,727,597 48% 52%
5 Credit Suisse Group $2,289,360 52% 48%
6 Lehman Brothers $2,211,761 66% 34%
7 Elliott Management $1,574,840 1% 99%
8 Blackstone Group $1,360,942 49% 51%
9 FMR Corp $1,345,852 49% 51%
10 Bear Stearns $1,241,290 57% 43%
11 Capital Group Companies $1,132,443 52% 47%
12 Bain Capital $1,084,970 71% 29%
13 Citigroup Inc $981,871 64% 36%
14 KKR & Co $971,250 23% 77%
15 National Venture Capital Assn$941,886 50% 50%
16 CME Group $926,710 55% 45%
17 Carlyle Group $875,078 61% 39%
18 DE Shaw & Co $841,741 96% 4%
19 Securities Industry
& Financial Mkt Assn $810,200 51% 49%
20 Investment Co Institute $797,506 58% 42%


http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/contrib.php?ind=F07++&goButt2.x=9&goButt2.y=12&goButt2=Submit




2008


1 Obama, Barack (D) Senate $14,070,872
2 McCain, John (R) Senate $8,276,377
3 Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) Senate $6,681,904
4 Giuliani, Rudolph W (R) $5,087,095
5 Romney, Mitt (R) $4,929,537
6 Dodd, Christopher J (D-CT) Senate $2,853,332
7 McConnell, Mitch (R-KY) Senate $827,436
8 Richardson, Bill (D) $799,100
9 Coleman, Norm (R-MN) Senate $796,275
10 Warner, Mark (D-VA) $785,443
11 Edwards, John (D) $784,395
12 Sununu, John E (R-NH) Senate $778,350
13 Emanuel, Rahm (D-IL) House $645,700
14 Baucus, Max (D-MT) Senate $609,250
15 Himes, Jim (D-CT) $538,304
16 Durbin, Dick (D-IL) Senate $531,062
17 Thompson, Fred (R) $498,355
18 Lautenberg, Frank R (D-NJ) Senate $476,283
19 Shays, Christopher (R-CT) House $469,645
20 Biden, Joseph R Jr (D-DE) Senate $441,225

http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/recips.php?cycle=2008&ind=F07


"Dancing with the ones that brung ya".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RantinRavin Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. How many millions did this study cost ?
When everyone here could have done it in one page costing 5 bucks....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. or less!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. No Shit Sherlock.....who but an idiot would expect these thieves do
do anything less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. The taxpayers got ripped off for this report, too.
Edited on Thu Feb-05-09 12:46 PM by hughee99
188 pages to say what we all knew at the time and could sum up in 6 word. "The taxpayers will get ripped off".

When you take a pile of money, and give it to people who fucked their companies up by engaging in questionable, unethical or outright fraudulent behavior, you should expect that they're going to put their "expertise" to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And what will be Obama's excuse when the economy has totally crumbled?
"Uh, how was I to know that Gensler, Summers, Rubin and Geithner had not reformed and turned to Jesus?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
22. *babble* but I, like, TRUST our officials coz theyre so much smarter than us and have access to,
like, secret information. that's like why secret tribunals and Nazi Iraq are so much better off
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. " I'm shocked, shocked to find that fraud is going on in here!"
Casablanca meets Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alterfurz Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
26. TARP = Taxpayer Ass-Reaming Program
and get ready now for the "bad bank" Bad Asset Repository Fund = BARF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC