Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraqis Blame Bombings On Occupation Forces

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 11:38 PM
Original message
Iraqis Blame Bombings On Occupation Forces

With incessant bombings claiming the lives of more Iraqi civilians and policemen, several Iraqi experts ruled out the attacks were perpetrated by members of the Iraqi resistance, fingering the U.S.-led occupation, Al-Qaeda and Israel.
Dr. Waad Ibrahim..argued that "several neighboring countries and bodies have hidden agendas that can only be achieved by destabilizing Iraq."

The expert exonerated the patriotic Iraqi resistance from any responsibility, asserting its elements lack the potentials to plot such devastating bombings especially that such techniques can only be carried out by countries and not individuals. Iraqi writer, Farouk Najy, believes that "the occupation forces are the only party benefiting from the attacks, and are likely behind the attacks. Is it possible that such shattering bombings would not kill even one single American soldier killed?" He asserted that most of these attacks take place immediately after U.S. forces leave the area, which suggests they had prior knowledge...."I believe the mystery of the whole matter proves that the occupation forces are behind the attacks."

Amid speculation about violence in Iraq, many observers wonder whether Washington wants to ignite sedition in Iraq or show that insecurity necessitate the presence of its occupation forces. Ihsan Omar, a Baghdad University academic, believes that the "booby-trapped car bombings are highly sophisticated and well-planned operations plotted by the U.S. forces to incite a civil strife between Iraq’s Sunnis and Shiites." He accused the United States of attempting to "create the impression that security can only be provided by the Americans and that Iraqis are unable to run their own country."

"It doesn’t matter who perpetrated the attacks, all we want is our usurped country. We yearn for the security we used to enjoy," lamented Hajj Abu Taha, the owner of a perfume shop in Baghdad. Younis Suleiman, another Iraqi citizen, believes that "the scale of violence in Iraq is directly connected to the rotating president of the U.S.-appointed Governing Council." When the rotating president is not one of Washington’s favorites, the occupation forces turn his month-tenure to a hell, he argued, recalling the period of Shiite member Abdul Aziz Al-Hakim. Suleiman anticipated similar crises this month under rotating president Mohsen Abdel Hamid, the head of the Iraqi Islamic Party.

http://www.islamonline.net/English/News/2004-02/18/article02.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mseltzer Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Really?
Do you think you could possibly find a less impressive source to cite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreyV Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What's wrong with www.islamonline.net?
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mseltzer Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-04 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Have you ever read any of their "news?"
It's a totally anti-american, anti-semitic site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Which of the sources in the article have been misquoted?

If you have other news sources that you prefer that are in conflict with their remarks, you should inform islamonline.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreyV Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Please elaborate...
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. this guy may have a point....it has continuously amazed me that
Edited on Thu Feb-19-04 12:45 AM by amen1234


so many gigantic explosions occur in Iraq, and yet, hardly any American soldiers are killed....just recently, several Iraqi police stations were blown up, with many people killed, and somehow, there was not a single Ameican killed...lot of these roadside bombs end up killing several Iraqis and NO American soldiers....


who knows what's really happening over there....there's as much sense in this guy's theory as in any other that I've heard lately....

it probably didn't help that OUR soldiers blew a missile right through a civilian Iraqi home the other day (accidentally, they claim) killing innocent women and children....IMO, that added a lot to the conspiracy theorists....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. What is interesting to me is in comparison to Afghanistan, where for 2 yrs

the press "over there" (which has been bombed to a trickle, as you may imagine) has consistently insisted that the US was simply not reporting its own casualties, but with Iraq, while there is some of that, just from "chatter," the prevailing opinion seems to be that it is odd indeed that the crusaders appear to be invulnerable to these near-daily blasts.

On the other hand, since the first thing they do is block off the area from press or Iraqis, and just common sense tells you that they are not reporting all their deaths - know what, I bet it's a certs breath mint - we're ALL right :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. It has been widely reported that Iraqis suspect the US for the bombings
So this isn't really a stretch. In any case, as the occupying power, the US is ultimately responsible (legally) for the mayhem. Wonder when the lawsuits will start pouring in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC