Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-BART officer accused of murder out on bail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:37 AM
Original message
Ex-BART officer accused of murder out on bail
Source: CNN

updated 4 hours, 49 minutes ago
Ex-BART officer accused of murder out on bail

http://i2.cdn.turner.com.nyud.net:8090/cnn/2009/CRIME/02/07/bart.officer.bail/art.mehserle.jpg

OAKLAND, California (CNN) -- A former transit police officer charged with murder was released from custody Friday after posting a $3 million bail.

Dozens of demonstrators gathered in downtown Oakland to protest the release of Johannes Mehserle, 27, charged with killing an unarmed man on New Year's Day.

The former Bay Area Rapid Transit police officer's release funds came from unknown sources, Alameda officials told CNN.

Video taken by a bystander showed Mehserle pulling his gun and fatally shooting Oscar Grant III, 22, in the back as another officer kneeled on Grant.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/07/bart.officer.bail/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dcindian Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hasn't he already run once?
Why the bail? Oh.... wait he is white.

And how the heck does a transit cop get the ability to post 3 million in bail? I wonder who helped.... is there a way to find out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. No, he did not run....and it would be 300K.
Someone could have put a house or other property up for the 300k.

And he was not charged when he left the area, so he did not run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mulsh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. he's probably safer in Santa Rita than anywhere he's allowed to
go. I hope his lawyer has him hidden somewhere secure, if he can figure our where that might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sazemisery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who paid for this guy's bail?
snip...

"The former Bay Area Rapid Transit police officer's release funds came from unknown sources, Alameda officials told CNN."

I have worked in the bail bond business for 33 years. This is what I would require to post this bond:
10% fee = $300,000.00.
Collateral worth 3 million dollars. For those who don't know how bail bonds work, consider it the same as going to the bank for a loan. The banker will loan you the money and charge you interest. Interest = bail bond fee. But the banker also wants collateral worth the amount of the loan to protect himself from a loss if you don't pay him back. If you don't show up in Court, the bail bond agent has to pay the Court the 3 million dollars.

He's got some pretty wealthy friends, is all I got to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The question of who paid his bail occurred to me, too.
I doubt he had the assets to collateralize a $3 million bail. Perhaps we'll find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Well, it IS the SF Bay Area
A house that would cost $100,000 anywhere else costs $700,000 in the bay area...it's one of the priciest real estate markets on the planet (the entire Bay Area is second only to Manhattan in RE values, and the Bay Area is much larger). It would only take a few homeowning friends and relatives to pool resources and come up with the collateral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
29. Maybe the FOP or other union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Too bad he couldn't have been denied bail
I think he should have stayed in jail. If I were to guess, I'd say it was the California Peace Officers' Association who funded much of his bail. They are the ones supposedly financing his defense. That and a combination of individual donations from fellow BART cops, and other cops in the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why is there bail in the first place?
That is bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Apparently under the law he had to be granted bail
http://www.mercurynews.com/topstories/ci_11647292

Jacobson ruled that bail was permissible because Mehserle did not pose an immediate danger to society, had not made threats against others and was not charged with a capital murder, the only three requirements necessary under the state constitution for a defendant to be denied bail.

But, Jacobson said, because Mehserle is considered a flight risk, he set the amount at $3 million to ensure the defendant does not flee the country in an attempt to avoid a trial. Mehserle was arrested in Nevada on Jan. 13.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Don't African Americans count as members of society? How about the President?
Edited on Sat Feb-07-09 03:07 PM by Joe Chi Minh
sounds like a South African Boer name, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. As someone else pointed out....
remember how DU members felt about the use of "Hussein" in the presidential election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
39. You really think they were "bona fide" Dems? Or are you not a "bona fide" Dem yourself?
Edited on Sun Feb-08-09 01:56 PM by Joe Chi Minh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
42. because he has a right to bail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Bail for someone performing a public execution, on TAPE?
Edited on Sun Feb-08-09 06:49 PM by Seldona
And there is no RIGHT to bail. It is denied all the time. If allowing a psychopath back in the community can be prevented, it should. It's not that there is grainy, hard to see, video. The murder was shot from eight different angles!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. yes
just like all folks have the right to a jury trial and present a defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. That makes me really angry.
It might be lawful but it is not just. And if he is acquitted of murder this town is going to explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. Then I hope they reduce the charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. At trial, the way it's usually handled is the judge gives the jury the option of convicting
On a lesser charge. I believe both parties have to agree to that kind of instruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Do some people here only believe in the US Constitution for those we only like?
Edited on Sat Feb-07-09 12:35 PM by HardWorkingDem
I find it very troubling how people on the left on one hand are demanding that people being held in places like Gitmo should receive due process of law, while on the other hand seem to ignore it for this guy.

Yes, he committed a terrible accident. It is not murder and he is still entitled to his day in court.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcindian Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Accident?????????????
Wow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Probably should re-classify as tremendous act of negligence or incompetence...
Maybe accident is too weak of a word, but this was not an act of "murder" as so many keep suggesting.

If there were an audio tape of this man saying something like, "I'm going to shoot you" or some other evidence comes forward proving this was murder, then it can be called "murder."

And like I've suggested other times, if people want to see this man acquitted, then keep pushing for him to charged with murder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MicaelS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. You are behind the curve
He has ALREADY been charged with murder. http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory?id=6644761
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. You are a moron..
Edited on Sun Feb-08-09 02:15 PM by sendero
... you don't know WHAT it is. It sure looks like murder to me. The prosecutor thinks it is murder. Did some fairy tell you otherwise?

And from where I sit, murder while operating as an agent of the law should have DOUBLE PUNISHMENT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Good ole fashioned name calling, eh....real mature...
You know, go to your local community college and sign up for a criminal justice class, or better yet, take a peek in Black's Law Dictionary.

There are certain things they call "elements" of an offense. And as anyone one with a smidgen of intelligence knows, there is a common thought that some prosecutors could get a ham sandwich indicted before a grand jury.

And why is it so hard to figure out that the prosecutor is possibly using the murder charge in a political way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. you have access to all the evidence?
maybe you can share it with the rest of us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Is it not on film?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. what's on film is one person's view of the scene
does it tell the whole story-probably not


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. No. It's the camera's...! Well, I've seen some tortured "reasoning" in my time, but never anything
as surreal as that! Not "probably not", virtually certainly, "Yes".

"One person's view?" What do want? One of those medical body scanners?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. do you know the story of why this guy was arrested in the first place
Edited on Sun Feb-08-09 05:52 PM by davidinalameda
he and several other people were fighting on a BART train

if I was on that train, I would have called the police as well

if I was a BART cop, I would have restrained his ass as well

show me where the torture is

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Is English your first language? I said your reasoning was tortured. This was about a helpless man
Edited on Sun Feb-08-09 06:36 PM by Joe Chi Minh
being shot in the back, or hadn't you noticed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. accidents like that happen
you know that this wasn't one?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Do YOU?!?!? And the countless others here who keep screaming "murder"?
No, of course not. But read a statute on murder. This is not murder. No matter how heinous it was, it is not criminal murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. unbunch your panties
I haven't been screaming murder

I actually live in the area and that is my BART station


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Try.......
Picking up a book on criminal statutes. Also, John Burris, the attorney to the Grant family has been on record stating he does not believe a first degree murder charge is appropriate. When this is all said and done, I think it will be clear the prosecutor charged this man with the statute he did for political purposes.

Next, as I suggested, if people here want this guy punished, then the appropriate charge needs to be actually charged, otherwise, and mark my words, this man will be acquitted or will have his verdict overturned on appeal.

Lastly, two things about the video tape: how many times have people seen video of an incident and the later outcome be different from what people thought was in the video and, where in the video is INTENT shown?


I hate to be the person that bursts the bubble of so many here, but people better take a look at trials, court room procedures and statues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Huh? We should look at "statues"? Why?
Oh, you must mean "statutes". LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. "Yes, he committed a terrible accident"...
"It is not murder and he is still entitled to his day in court."

B, but you seem to have already tried the case yourself. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. The point I'm trying to make is this....
Do you want to see this person punished for what he did?

If so, then when his trial arrives, the appropriate charge must be filed or else there will be a great chance he will be acquitted or have his verdict overturned on an appeal.

Is that what you want to see?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Read this part again. And again. And again. Until you start sympathizing with the right side.
"Video taken by a bystander showed Mehserle pulling his gun and fatally shooting Oscar Grant III, 22, in the back as another officer kneeled on Grant."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Have you had much dealing with criminal courts in America?
Evidently you have not. I have. I have had many dealings with murder cases in court. You need to take a crash course in LEGAL definitions of things like murder and intent.

Please, don't get me wrong - I'm not saying this man should not be punished. He should be. But if the most extreme people have their way and if he is tried for murder, he most likely WILL be acquitted or his verdict overturned. Whether you, I, or anyone else likes it or not, what he did, most likely will not sustain a charge of murder in a criminal trial.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I think you are a poser.
You don't write well enough to be a lawyer, so if you have had many dealings with murder cases, it surely was not in that role. Therefore, color me unimpressed with your (stunningly obvious) assertions about the right to a fair trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Did I state I was a lawyer? Can you read?
Guess not.

But hey, it works both ways, you want to say I'm a fake Dem, my comment to you is why don't you call up Dick Cheney because you apparently think just like him and his sort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Tell us the extenuating circumstances, in US law, will you. Why it's not first-degree murder
to shoot a man lying helpless on the ground in the back. We'd all be intrigued to hear. And we fully understand the twisted nature of human jurisprudence, but this is kind of special, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. Probably the most telling factor is "intent"....
When this trial hits the courtroom, the defense will most likely be able to show this man did not have the intent to actually kill this man. There are other more appropriate charges that would almost surely lead to some sort of conviction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #8
34. Due process would determine whether or not
this was an accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. That seems highly likely, I would think. But I don't think anyone is disputing that. What,
do you and HardWorkingDem think we want a lynching party to despatch our "Efricaaner" friend. Maybe that would be ideal on one level, but we believe in the rule of law here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
33. Jesus H. Christ. Where does a transit cop
come up with a 3 million dollar bail? Who's backing him? The Klan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. His parents own a nice house
They may have tapped into equity. Another possibility is a union helping him out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
44. Let's see - I fatally shoot someone in the back - ON FILM - get out of jail, and ain't gonna run??
.
.
.

yeah - right.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC