Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Rural Alaska Villages, Families Struggle to Survive

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:15 PM
Original message
In Rural Alaska Villages, Families Struggle to Survive
Source: CNN

Thousands of villagers in rural Alaska are struggling to survive, forced to choose between keeping their families warm and keeping their stomachs full, residents say.

Harvested nuts and berries, small game animals, and dried fish are the only things keeping some from starving.

To get to the nearest store, Ann Strongheart and her husband, who live in Nunam Iqua, Alaska, take an hour-and-15-minute snowmobile ride to Emmonak, Alaska. Their town does not have a store of its own.

In many stores, 2 pounds of cheese costs between $15 and $18, milk costs $10 a gallon, a 5-pound bag of apples costs $15, and a dozen eggs costs $22 -- more than double the price in the area just two years ago.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/02/09/rural.alaska.villages/index.html



Plus $1,500 a month to heat their homes! Governor Palin . . . do something for these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm thrilled that CNN has picked up this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Palin is to busy
She can't take time out from promoting "herself" and trying to stay in the republican parties top ten list!

I think I read an article last week stating that she and a republican in the state congress were butting heads on this. He wants some action taken "NOW", and Palin isn't ready to declare and "emergency" yet! I think she is sent someone up to take a look at the problem, but she concluded it did not meet the "guidelines" for an emergency yet! Obviously the woman is an idiot :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Any help for the actual people is accidental - It's media exploitation to further Palin's "Road to
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 06:08 PM by GreenTea
Nowhere" project paid for by our tax dollars.

Palin wants to build a 3 BILLION dollar plus road there and all the way up the west coast of Alaska.

Once started the road will cost far more in excess of 3 billion dollars, but it'll make Palin look as if she's doing some great work for poor people on a huge project, But really it'll help her presidential image while the same sleazy corporations will be building it and then use the road to exploit for other corporations (oil) profits.

So this sad story should really help & serve Palin very well, to get her multi-billion dollar road built - Again, the road she wants built is really meant to help get more profits for the oil companies and other resource grabbing, fuck the land & wildlife corporations for republicans like Palin and her presidential aspirations.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. A far better use of funds would be to build a railroad
Edited on Mon Feb-09-09 06:10 PM by Blue_In_AK
to western Alaska by which goods AND people could get out there and back without the huge maintenance costs that a highway would undoubtedly entail. Plus, it's cleaner for the environment. In fairness, it really isn't all that outlandish to consider a transportation link to the western part of our state aside from air travel, which is the only way we can get out there now (at extremely high cost) but a road would be a huge boondoggle.

That's just my opinion, but a lot of people here agree with me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canaar Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Interesting concept.
What would you propose for a distribution system once the railroad would be punched through the Alaska Range. I could envision a railroad from Anchorage to McGrath and then to the Yukon that would provide goods up and down the Kuskokwim and Yukon Rivers. Would be curious whether a roadbed could be built on sufficiently solid ground to reach the Seward Peninsula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I think if the railroad went from Fairbanks to Nome
it's a shorter route and could avoid much of the Alaska Range which lies between here (Anchorage) and Fairbanks. I'm looking at a topographical map right now, and it looks like fairly smooth terrain from Fairbanks to Manley Hot Springs, Ruby, Galena, Council and then on to Nome. Of course, it could be marsh out there, too, which might be an issue, but as far as mountains, it doesn't look too bad. I'm going to have to get out my Alaska atlas here and check out what the terrain is out there.

I'm no engineer, but it just seems like the maintenance would be much less of an issue with a railroad than with a highway. Spurs could be built to the other little towns out there.

(I'm thinking big like old Wally Hickel. :rofl: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canaar Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The Fairbanks to Nome
option for a roadbed continues to get a lot of play. I question the purpose of focusing on Nome. I understand that geologists and prospectors are a pretty tight lipped bunch so there may be mineral resources on the Seward Peninsula that bulk ground transportation might help to be developed. Certainly a rail system would be more cost effective transportation than a highway. My perspectives on Western Alaska are admittedly focused on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta and Bristol Bay as this area of the bush has a much greater number of communities and population than the Seward Peninsula and Slope. Rail transport of bulk goods including fuel and construction materials across the Alaska Range for transhipment down both major rivers could be a real boon for those communities as well as helping to create a sustainable fresh water port at Bethel. I would like to hear a discussion of the relative difficulties of maintaining track through the Alaska Range (Windy or Rainy Passes) on a rock foundation (but with significant avalanche issues) compared with maintaining a railbed on marsh over permafrost (my knowledge of terrain between Fairbanks and Nome being practically non-existent).

I think that the root of my discomfort with the Fairbanks to Nome rail or road lies in my sense that the proposed link represents a disregard of Native Alaska community economic development in favor of pouring money into Nome, perhaps the only primarily non-native community in Western Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. You certainly have good points.
Edited on Tue Feb-10-09 02:48 PM by Blue_In_AK
Bethel would work for me, too, if a way could be found, and maybe makes more sense since I believe there are about a 1,000 more people there than Nome, plus all the Y-K villages, as you point out.

In either case, it seems to me like some form of ground transportation between the more populated areas of the state on the road system and the west would be a good thing, not only for transporting goods but people, as well. As it is now, urban and rural Alaskans are almost completely out of touch with each other which has led to many, many misunderstandings and inequalities over the decades. This is one state; we should be linked.

And then, of course, there's Juneau...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Is the ground solid enough for a railroad?
I was under the impression it was mostly permafrost. If it were possible, a train connecting those villages could make all the difference in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I would think a railroad would have a smaller footprint, causing less melting/sinking than a hiway.
They would have to do work on it regularly to keep it from sinking, but there would be less against the ground than a highway, perhaps. Perhaps I have no clue also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ranting_Wacko Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let them eat wolf!
Plenty of good eating on them. dontcha know? Why can't they just get in their helicopters and go hunting like I do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No, they eat caribou, which is why the wolf population has to be kept down. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canaar Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. It's not the subsistence hunters
of caribou who are driving the "only good wolf, is a wolf killed from the air," debate. This is purely a cash driven debate by guides, outfitters, sport hunters and the supporting commercial enterprises. Subsistence hunters historically took wolves for clothing as well as for herd management. Subsistence hunting evolved through increased trading opportunities into a subsistence/cash economy for which 'pelts for cash' to purchase and maintain the tools for taking game became a key to the local economies. One of the unintended consequences of the animal rights activists' influence on the fur fashion industry has been to eliminate the cash base from the subsistence/cash relationship. What has replaced it is wasteful aerial herd management through wanton wolf slaughter while at the same time disrupting a fragile economic relationship for aboriginal people living in a very demanding and unforgiving environment. Not the whole story perhaps, but a few vital pieces in the larger economic picture puzzle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I think you covered some of the main topics.
Good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, if ONLY Sarah could have brought such economic beauty to the rest of America - sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. So Alaska has LAWS which are preventing these people from getting help??
I wish Obama would step in and help them, it would show her up BIG TIME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-09-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. a dozen eggs costs $22 -wow - something wrong there
.
.
.

I was upset when our eggs went from $1.80 to $2.55 a dozen

Think I'll not complain anymore

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. I would think it would be cheaper to have a village henhouse
The grain would have to be cheaper then paying that crazy price for eggs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC