Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US 'lost track of Afghan weapons'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:44 PM
Original message
US 'lost track of Afghan weapons'
Source: BBC News

US 'lost track of Afghan weapons'

The US military has failed to keep track of thousands of weapons shipped to Afghanistan, leaving them vulnerable to being lost or stolen, a report says.

The report has been compiled by congressional auditors, the US Government Accountability Office (GAO).

It found that, in the four years up to June 2008, the US military failed to keep complete records on some 222,000 weapons entering the country.

The report will be discussed in the US House of Representatives on Thursday.

It states that weapons supplied by the US to the Afghan military "are at serious risk of theft or loss".

The report says:

* US military officials failed to keep proper records on about 87,000 rifles, pistols, mortars and other weapons sent to Afghanistan between December 2004 and June 2008 - about a third of all the weapons sent
* There was a similar lack of management of a further 135,000 light weapons donated to Afghan forces via the US military by 21 countries
* The military failed even to record the serial numbers of some 46,000 weapons, making it impossible to confirm receipt of weapons or identify any which had fallen into the hands of militants
* The serial numbers of 41,000 weapons were recorded, but US military officials still had no idea where they were

Read more: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7885533.stm?a
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. how handy!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is Blackwater in Afghanistan? Serious q..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. They sure are in Afghanistan:
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 03:14 PM by balantz
- clip -

Hold on a second here. So a private contractor raided the offices of a rival private contractor and stole its records? Who gave it the authority to pretend it was the FBI? Is the USAID suddenly a law enforcement agency? Or did Blackwater do this on its own to get rid of a competitor? Either way, there’s no possible excuse for its actions.

But we’re not done yet. sarabeth, curious, did some more digging and came up with another AP story that added a fairly startling detail: units of the Afghan police provided security for Blackwater during the raid.

Afghan police provided security for the raid on the company, according to Paktiawal, and the U.S. official said Blackwater security teams took computers and office files. Two Afghan workers were taken into custody, and Blackwater held American and Canadian citizens at gunpoint, the official said.

What the hell is going on here? A private security company not only raids a rival and seizes its assets but it arrests two civilian Afghan workers and holds American and Canadian citizens at gunpoint? While the Afghan police protect them?

- clip -

http://commentsfromleftfield.com/2007/10/blackwater-assumes-police-powers-in-afghanistan-to-eliminate-rivals


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. So, how do you stabilize Afghanistan?
I know, let's ship them lots of weapons and fail to keep track of them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deja vu! We only lost 30% of all the weapons sent to Iraq! That only cost us about $2.8 billion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. At least we didn't lose any nukes!
I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. Incompetent BushCo criminals weapons selling greedy fucks - selling to both sides to keep
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 03:48 PM by GreenTea
the fighting going for profit in the war for profit!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. And we are supposed to damn the Peanut guy for what HE did with his inventory
right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariatprincess Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dysfunctional, incompetent, corrupt.
The entire military operations of the USA from defense spending to operations in the field are out of control and the most dangerous institution in the world.
Scary as hell..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Time for Obama to back Gates into a corner and not let him out until it's accounted for.
So of course this meeting will not occur in the Oval Office.

:rofl:

Sorry I couldn't resist adding the punchline. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC