Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spitzer Prostitution Wiretaps to Become Public

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 01:56 PM
Original message
Spitzer Prostitution Wiretaps to Become Public
Source: AP via CNBC

A Manhattan judge has ordered the government to make public sealed documents about wiretaps in the Eliot Spitzer scandal.

Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/id/29282296



As part of the agreement, 67 of the names will not be published. But that won't stop us amateur intelligence analysts from speculating!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. there are some details i could live without knowing
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if they'll bring up that article Spitzer wrote about the coverups?
I can't find the link, right now, but a department was told to back off (by Bush) regarding the housing situation, I think it was. It was dated March 10, 2007, I think.

That probably won't be mentioned, but I'll bet it has something to do with why they brought him down so quickly. Never the obvious...I doubt they cared about his extra-curricular activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. that is where I want this focus to go - but the media will focus on the
sex instead of the facts of the good work spitzer was doing and the rw loves that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. And also, whatever happened to John Edwards?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Every Time they Smear Spitzer - LET'S REMEMBER WHY
they are doing it


Predatory Lenders' Partner in Crime
How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. exactly
and why they want to continue to smear this man is right in line with the GOP'ers style of politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Eliot, prostitute, madam and banker - who else is out there? 64 FBI guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. CORRUPT Wall street cheered his demise with glee.



and because of it they are now watching their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another important snippet


"Thursday's ruling was a result of a request by The New York Times to unseal documents that outlined the prosecutors' probable cause for wiretapping two cellphones belonging to the prostitution ring."



probable cause? I guess we will finally find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Wait just a doggone
minute.






"Judge Jed Rakoff ruled on Thursday that the public's right to know about an investigation that led to the resignation of the governor outweighed any privacy concerns, especially since the names of other clients were to be redacted."


Okay, especially because the names of the OTHER CLIENTS are redacted?


Why is it okay to identify Spitzer, but none of the other johns?


And why is okay to identify all the prostitutes, but none of the johns, besides Spitzer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Very good questions.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Ill second that one ... good post nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. I Agree 100%
Identify those other johns and maybe we'll start getting enough pissed off, rich white guys to get something done about abuses of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. He was a Madoff investor. This may be related to that.

The timing is questionable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hate articles like this. WHO WHAT WHERE essentials missing and there is tilt. -
Again, after all these months they write it to make it sound like Spitzer ran a ring. Not until the fifth/sixth paragraphs do they say he was a client NOT A RING LEADER.\\

It is just despicable. Anyone who respects NBC is stupid.

We're lucky that Maddox and Olberman have a voice. THAT IS THE LIMIT.

CNBC is the voice of thieves and they want to keep smearing him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Looking forward to the David Vitter releases
Haha, just kidding....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. ROFL. Inverted Totalitarianism is so cute and predictable, isn't it?
OK, not cute. No more than a monstrous evil with blood-slathered jaws could ever be?

But it is predictable.

Yeah, Vitter. :rofl:

He gets a standing ovation in the Senate. No further investigation. No further prosecution. Excused from testifying at trial. I wonder if he shit his diaper in teary-eyed joy?

Inverted Totalitarianism, with all it's hug-a-bear window dressing as it pretends to be the Wolf in Grandma's Clothes, is as brutal and inevitable as it's Classic Totalitarianism predecessors.

Just less violent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC