Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roubini Warns Of 'Sovereign' Bank Failure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 05:30 PM
Original message
Roubini Warns Of 'Sovereign' Bank Failure
Source: The Age / Bloomberg

February 20, 2009 - 6:31AM

Nouriel Roubini, the New York University professor who predicted the global credit crisis, said a government-backed bank ''may crack'' as officials try to bail out their financial systems.

''The process of socializing the private losses from this crisis has already moved many of the liabilities of the private sector onto the books of the sovereign,'' Roubini wrote on his Web site today. ''At some point a sovereign bank may crack, in which case the ability of the governments to credibly commit to act as a backstop for the financial system -- including deposit guarantees -- could come unglued.''

Roubini didn't identify any sovereign bank that might run into difficulty.

He also said he sees a 30% chance of an ''L-shaped near-depression'' without ''appropriate and aggressive policy action'' by the US and other major economies to prevent a sovereign bank's failure.

The latest data indicate fourth-quarter gross domestic product in key economies including the US, the euro zone and Japan may be worse than initially reported.

Read more: http://business.theage.com.au/business/world-business/roubini-warns-of-sovereign-bank-failure-20090220-8cs4.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. L-shaped depression?
Does that mean everything collapses to zero and stays there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freemarketer6 Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not to zero, but it reaches a low and stays at that low for a long
long time, like what happened to Japan in the ninties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's better than our I shaped depression
That flat part of the L will feel like up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamuu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. *spits out his milk*
HAH!
yeah... good thing it won't be a lower-case l.
phew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Which soveriegn? Isn't Iceland already close? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Iceland is already gone. Ireland may be next.
Easter Europe is in major trouble, as is Russia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Russia is reporting that they are in relatively good shape. Here is a article from yesterday...
MOSCOW, February 17 (RIA Novosti) - Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said Tuesday at an economic conference that the country's Reserve Fund will be sufficient to balance this year's and future budgets.

The Reserve Fund was designed to cushion the federal budget against a fall in oil prices. Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin has said there would be extensive use of reserve funds to cover the 2009 budget deficit, which he said could total at least 6% of GDP.

"The deficit will be covered from our own resources: activities on the domestic loan market and the Reserve Fund, which currently stands at 4.8 trillion rubles <$132.6 billion>. These funds will be enough to balance the budget in this and subsequent years," Putin said.

According to the parameters of the federal budget for 2009 approved last year, expenditures were to total 9.024 trillion rubles ($248.4 billion at current exchange rates) and revenues slightly over 10 trillion rubles ($275.3 billion). These figures will be adjusted.

Putin also said the government would include the cost of implementing its anti-crisis program in the revised budget.

He said that although budget revenues would be cut, the government would not refrain from implementing key social and investment programs.

"In addition, new expenses will be fixed in the budget as part of anti-crisis measures," he said.

RIA NOVOSTI: http://en.rian.ru/business/20090217/120191393.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Former communist more fiscally responsible than Republicans
Balanced budgets? What are those?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yeah, Russia is such an open, transparent government...

...we should believe everything Putin tells us. Him and his buddy 'W' are two of a kind. Only Putin is less stupid, and 'W' is less evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Don't forget Switzerland - I read it in SMW
See what happens when countries are "neutral" about crimes like tax evasion and money laundering through off-shore accounts from around the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. The Swiss problems stem from loans to Eastern Yurrup...
...should have stuck to chocolates, fondue and over-priced watches... ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gee who could have known that NAFTA , a criminal government and a crooked financial system
working in tandem to fleece the common man could have brought us to this. Hmmmmmmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Don't forget Poland!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. here's the rub....
"...'appropriate and aggressive policy action' by the US and other major economies to prevent a sovereign bank's failure."

....example, the European public sector isn't rushing to inject borrowed 'recovery' money into their private sector to cover fraud, swindle and debt made in Washington and New York....

....and how happy are Americans going to be when they see their borrow domestic 'recovery' money being free-traded away from our economy by European and Asian corporations?

....unless everybody is on the same stimulus, recovery and bank bailout page the countries that are doing more will gravitate to protectionism out of necessity leaving the less able nations to fend for themselves....

"The process of socializing the private losses from this crisis has already moved many of the liabilities of the private sector onto the books of the sovereign,..."

....who has the reserves or cushion for debt to bail-out the nations of the world?....the New New World Order is coming....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. People smarter than me have said the US Heavyweights were insolvent before the bailout...
What has been filtered out of all 'news reporting'(and I use that designation loosely in describing what we see and hear in the US) is that esoteric financial derivative instruments engulfed all of the heavyweights, and the balance sheets put forth for public consumption were based on valuations that were nothing short of fantasy.

The receipt of billions of dollars meant that hedge funds didn't have to be closed out right away, and the whole credit swaps charade was not exposed.

I am afraid we are at the point that keeping the curtain from being pulled back is more important than the billions of dollars we are throwing around to make sure that does not happen.

I doubt we will every 'see' what the true state of affairs 'was' and 'is today.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mackerel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Lehrer Newshour had Dallas Salisbury on tonght
from choosetosave.org and he says that salaries and hourly pay won't return for another 20 years.

If we all lower our debt now and buy absolutely only what we need and with cash we can get things under control and in 15 years actually we will increase the value of hour pay.

The more Americans use credit the less our actual earnings are worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Take your pick
Citi, BofA, Chase.

I think Citi is the unnamed sovereign bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC