|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
rodbarnett
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:39 PM Original message |
Bush: 5.6 Percent Unemployment Rate 'A Good Number' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
POed_Ex_Repub
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, Too bad it's closer to 9.7% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 05:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. Be careful. What number are you using? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 06:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Here's the EPI's numbers (they put constructed unemployment at 7.6%) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 08:02 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. "Constructed" unemployment rate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 08:38 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. So what's unscientific here? what are you complaining about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevedeshazer
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 08:56 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. Smart ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 07:08 AM Response to Reply #34 |
46. What's unscientific? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mhr
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 07:26 AM Response to Reply #28 |
47. HI Organism, Understand That Frodo Is An Apologist For The Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 09:10 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. HI Organism, Understand That mhr rarely has the facts on his side on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crachet2004
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 11:47 AM Response to Reply #49 |
50. The fact is, he is right and you are wrong-deal with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 01:39 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. He really really takes good care of his hair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crachet2004
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 04:42 PM Response to Reply #52 |
57. Okay, Okay.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluzmann57
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. Well yeah it's good as compared with 10 pct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. Golly, if real unemployment were 5.6%, it wouldn't be half bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jimshoes
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. As long as they report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CO Liberal
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. Bush Popularity Below 50% is Also a Good Number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 01:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
54. No CHIMPANZEE McSHRUB in white house a =ZERO= a good Number |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Betty
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. Good number if you're not unemployed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radfringe
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. some other good numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 08:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
35. Deleted message |
joeunderdog
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 09:05 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. If Bush doesn't deserve responsibility for what happens on his watch, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfkrocks
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 09:15 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Right on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. Add all the numwits in the West Wing to the rolls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
54anickel
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:54 PM Response to Original message |
9. Umm, Think he and Greenspin need to sit and talk and get on the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dw
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:20 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. If they consider intaking oxygen and carbon-based foodstuffs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chookie
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
10. Like father, like son |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
htuttle
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. He's more afraid of blame... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robin Hood
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. What would the number be if 150,000 national guards were home? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Negligible due to the huge # of people in the workforce nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thor_MN
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 12:56 AM Response to Reply #13 |
43. Hmm, seems to me that Jan job increases were reported |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0007
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
22. The unemployment number would be higher for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 05:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. Nonexistant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavin4
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
12. What About Your Tax Cuts, George? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
20. the magnitude of the failure is staggering |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
16. I believe I have heard argued . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pw
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. It's a good number if you want to hold wages down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
17. quote: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 05:12 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. How does a president create a recession in his first few months of office? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Another Bill C.
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
18. He's aiming for his daddy's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jburton
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
21. rate this on yahoo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
26. Worst. President. Ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthbetold
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 05:41 PM Response to Original message |
27. That number seems low.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcuno
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 08:36 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. It's a percent and in itself, misleading. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthbetold
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 10:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Ah, gotcha. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfkrocks
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
30. Gotta love this clown-not! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
31. Deleted message |
rfkrocks
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 08:35 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. new job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yavin4
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 09:07 PM Response to Reply #31 |
38. You've Lost Two Years of Income And You're Happy?!?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-04 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
40. Right George - 5.6% is a great number - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barkley
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 12:46 AM Response to Original message |
42. The unemployment rate is not 5.6% the 'swing states' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flaminbats
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 01:23 AM Response to Original message |
44. I understand that seven is God's number... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 04:55 AM Response to Original message |
45. The more he harps on this, the more out of touch he looks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
74dodgedart
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
48. How would he know, he's not a statistician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
51. Time to start repeating "Let 'em EAT CAKE!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bearfan454
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
53. This number counts the Military as employed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frodo
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 02:22 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Link please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VeniceBeat
![]() |
Tue Feb-24-04 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
56. Now I Know Why Bush* Didn't Let the Feds Extend My Unemployment Benefits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crachet2004
![]() |
Wed Feb-25-04 11:09 AM Response to Reply #56 |
58. That's all it was, a cynical political trick... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC