There's a reason why we sign these treaties: to protect my son in the military. That's why we have these treaties, so when Americans are captured they are not tortured. That's the reason in case anybody forgets it.
--Sen. Joesph Biden (Ashcroft hearing, June 8, 2004)
Until we fulfill our treaty-bound duties to bring suspects before a court, the U.S. Constitution is in breach and our armed services personnel are without the protection afforded by our adherence to treaty.
We face an unprecedented crisis. The man we allowed to occupy the Office of the President for eight years tortured in our name.
We must confront the inescapable reality that the 43rd President of the United States must stand trial for war crimes.If we get our so-called "leaders" to see that there is no way out of our treaty-bound duty to try Bush, resistance to prosecuting the "lower level" government officials will melt away.
And when the magnitude of this unprecedented moment in history sinks in, it becomes clear that an unprecedented response is called for. Obama's attempt to foist this off on Holder is
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=103&topic_id=443901&mesg_id=443901">driven by denial. Good man though he may be, Holder simply doesn't have the stature required. Something this big needs more than the investigation of a special prosecutor, out of sight, and out of mind. We need a person, or a panel, to oversee distinct efforts to gather evidence, conduct prosecutions, and to confront the failures of our Congress and of the "fifth estate" that allowed this nation to go so far astray for so long.
Who might have the required stature? Check out
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=5572518&mesg_id=5572518">Kismet!?! Justice Souter Should Preside Over Our War Crimes Tribunal/Inquiry