Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP source: Obama has more than 6 people for court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:32 PM
Original message
AP source: Obama has more than 6 people for court
Source: AP (via Yahoo)

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama is considering a list of more than six contenders for the Supreme Court that is dominated by women and Hispanics, one that includes judges and leaders from own his administration who have never donned a judicial robe.

Among those under consideration are Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and U.S. Appeals Court judges Sonia Sotomayor and Diane Pamela Wood. California Supreme Court Justice Carlos Moreno is also under review by Obama.

Sources familiar with Obama's deliberations confirmed the names to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because no candidates have been revealed by the White House. The confirmation amounts to the first time any name has been directly tied to Obama.

One official cautioned that Obama is considering other people who have not been publicly mentioned. And more names may be added as the administration considers a replacement for retiring Justice David Souter. . .

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090513/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_supreme_court



I have a feeling we may see Granholm get it. She's credentialed, only 50, a governor (Obama is a big admirer of Earl Warren), thoroughly vetted, empathetic with solid experience, and doesn't have a judicial record to pick apart.

I for one would be for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dang. I was so hoping he'd pick me.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Associate Justice Velveteen Ocelot may just be too much.
Although otherwise, I am sure you would be first choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. It will be the guy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. It won't be Granholm.
She messed up the primary here in Michigan (with help from the MI GOP, granted) and did it to give the state to Hilary. Obama's since acted like Michigan either doesn't exist or shouldn't. All that crap about the car companies but tons of free money to the banks? Granholm's come out against all that double-standard stuff, and I just don't think Obama's going to put her in there.

I'm hoping she'll replace Stabenow in the Senate for us. She'd be better there, though I'll give her this: she's a great lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. "she's a great lawyer" - yep. She would be a strong choice. Probably won't happen, but . . .
Don't underestimate Obama's wish to put somebody with public experience on the Court. She would handle the Senate hearings easily, and maybe be the kind of consensus builder who could occasionally split the Roberts-Souter-Alito-Thomas iron grip. Occasionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. She's a moderate and pro-business, but the GOP hates her.
I mean, rabid, frothing at the mouth, crazy hates her. My dad's gone right-wing in his old age, and he says that craziest stuff about her that he's heard on the radio--and he actually liked her at first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Det FP headline online: Granholm reported among 6 considered for U.S. Supreme Court seat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Sounds like the stuff my family says about her.
I have no idea why they're so crazy in their hatred. She's a moderate. Still, it's not like she's been the governor we really needed--we needed someone who could strongarm all the powers in Michigan and figure out a new way for our state to survive. She just hasn't done it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. She's been a good governor
I think a lot of what has held the state back has been because of the GOP. They went from having control of everything to suddenly having to answer to a Democratic governor. So I think they decided to do to Granholm what the Republicans are now doing to Obama. Just say no and obstruct everything while offering no new ideas. The GOP would rather let the MI languish than to have Granholm look good. I don't see how she could "strongarm" people into doing something they don't want to do. Why doesn't Obama just strongarm the GOP into supporting his policies? It's unfortunate that Granholm didn't have control of both houses in large enough majorities so she could've made the most of her term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Oh, I agree that the MI GOP's been ruining the state. That's definite.
At least, that's what I call messing with every single budget and getting crazier and crazier right-wingers as party higher-ups.

I was just thinking that she's worked so hard for consensus when sometimes she's needed to play hardball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I see Obama walking down this same road.
Granholm, I believe , thought that everyone would work together to build a better Michigan when she was first elected. By the time she was in her second term, I think she had figured the GOP out and with the House in Democratic control got more done. For example, I'm happy she fought for the 2007 tax increase. She didn't get her original plan but she knew we needed a tax increase and got her way. Also, the RPS and the film incentives were Granholm ideas that she pushed for and was able to get through Congress.

Obama's need for bipartisanship is similar to Granholm's desire to work for a "consensus." I hope Obama wises up because the GOP will oppose him no matter what, including the Supreme Court appointee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. She did not try to give MI to Hillary
There had been talk of Michigan moving up before, including in 2004. The idea that this was done just to help Hillary is absurd. That being said, it was a mistake to move to an early primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. There had been talk before, but nothing came of it.
My personal theory is that the MI GOP were the real bad guys, and I have no idea why our party leaders thought that the GOP agreeing with them on this was a good idea. The MI GOP saw that they'd only lose half their delegates but we'd lose all of ours and were the ones who put the bill forward in the House. Why our party leaders, including Granholm, didn't see through that crap, I'll never know.

Granholm and Stabenow were firmly in Hilary's camp, and they were trying to swing the state her way. Why else were the rank and file completely ignored (no one at any of the county meetings ever heard anyone telling Mark that it was a good idea or agreeing to it)? The entire thing backfired, and Obama's been very dismissive of our state and its needs since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I guess we'll have to agree to disagree
I don't believe moving MI's primary was a way to help Hillary. Hillary probably would've won Michigan and moving risked losing our delegates at the convention. Why would anyone want to risk losing ALL of their Michigan delegates just to move to a primary a few weeks earlier? I just don't see the move benefiting Hillary enough to make her supporters take such risks.

Levin has been pushing to take away Iowa and New Hampshire's unfair influence in the primary process for years. I believe enough people, including Granholm, agreed and finally decide to go for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. I bet he'll 'go hybrid' with Diane Pamela Wood - hispanic woman without hispanic name

just my guess - early bets pay higher <g>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. How will Obama give away the store with this as he's done with torture and the banks?
Stay tuned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
downindixie Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. If they don't have a law degree
I'm not for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. No problem. They all do.
And distinguished academic records in the law. Some are federal judges; Granholm is a former Wayne County prosecutor and Michigan attorney general. She clerked in law school for federal Judge Damon Keith, one of the very best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-13-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am prepared to be disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. All 6 should be FEMALE . . . we need a bunch of women on the court . . .
PROGRESSIVE, LIBERAL WOMEN . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Would it be just too rude for President Obama to ask Scalia and Thomas to retire...
in order to make room for the more qualified applicants on his list? I mean, he's gone to all that trouble to make a list and shit, no sense wasting the effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. Perhaps Granholm's silence on the gutting of the Big 3 is the quid pro quo for this appointment
Because based on what's happened thusfar, it would not otherwise appear that Granholm has much influence with the Obama administration. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. I think she's been pretty vocal regarding the auto industry
I've seen her on the news numerous times speaking on the developments coming out of the industry. Several times, you could tell she was quite angry. Whether she has enough pull with Obama to influence his decisions is unknown. I would hope he listens to Granholm but considering that MI is usually ignored in Washington (except at election time), I'm pretty skeptical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. She was for a time. But she's shut her mouth since the Chrysler BK. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. The youngest one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Optical.Catalyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-14-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
26. I hope he gets all six appointed to the Supreme Court
President Obama has seven years left in the White House.

Justices Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer were all born in the 1930's.

Is six really too many to ask for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC