Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader Accuses McAuliffe of Suppressing (2004) Votes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:45 AM
Original message
Nader Accuses McAuliffe of Suppressing (2004) Votes
Source: Washington Post

Nader Accuses McAuliffe of Suppressing Votes
Anita Kumar

Consumer activist Ralph Nader accused Terry McAuliffe Thursday of orchestrating an effort to remove him from the presidential ballot in 2004 when McAuliffe was chairman of the Democratic National Committee.

Nader said that McAuliffe offered him an unspecified amount of money to campaign in 31 states if Nader would agree to pull his campaign in 19 battleground states.

"When you get a call like that, first of all it's inappropriate,'' Nader said in an interview. "The other thing is if you don't immediately say no, it's like taffy, you get stuck with it."

The latest charge against McAuliffe, who is in a hotly-contested three-way Democratic primary for governor, calls into question -- again -- whether his political career is a liability for him as a candidate.

Read more: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/virginiapolitics/2009/05/post_228.html#more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Onehandle Accuses Nader of destroying America to sate his ego. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well at least you have an original thought. i'd never heard that angle before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ro1942 Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. nader
nader has a lot more integrity than the dem. party, he represents what this country badly needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Mac's mistake was believing nader would play ball with Dems like he
did with repukes. Silly man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm sure if MAC had offered a contribution Nader would have accepted it. It was the strings that
Nader rejected.

I'm also confident that if the Repos offered Mac money in his campaign that he would accept it, just as Hillary did during her primary last year.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Suuure. nader was gleeful to accept bush's help in Florida in 2000.
You can stick up for that snake if you want to. He is worst than the dirt on my shoe to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. You can scaegoat away if it makes you feel better. It seems to.
i don't understand why it makes people feel better, but it sure seems to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. The difference is, the repukes were paying Nader to do what he
wanted to do anyway, but didn't have the money for. McAuliffe was offering "hush money"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Whatever Terry Mac did, it had to be done in the best interests of the country
Politics is a dirty business. Bush's "re" election had to be stopped; if Ralph Nader was treated unfairly in that endeavor than so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Right, because who needs democracy?
I don't understand this scapegoating of Nader. He had every right to run and people had every right to see his name on the ballots. It doesn't matter if he's an asshole. Scapegoating him is counterproductive to recognizing the real things Democrats need to do to win elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Some things are more important than democracy
Prop 8 was passed by way of democracy; so were the 11 anti-gay marriage state initiatives in 2004.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cal Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Do you hear yourself?
Look, our democracy is terribly flawed - there is no question that prop 8 and other anti-human-rights initiatives make it through the system corrupted by $$$ used to spread propaganda. That isn't democracy either. This is a serious problem but forgive me for not grasping how further suppression of democratic principles is the solution.

This party-over-principle attitude and irrational scapegoating is not going to keep people in the Democratic party, let alone attract new voters to the party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. The ends justify the means?
Wow...just wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hugo_from_TN Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bribing political opponents - nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ralph Nader...
simply needs to FOAD and the sooner the damned better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm not a big Nader fan,
but if this is true and it helps Virginians pick a candidate for governor who has a chance of winning-thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
15. I wish McAuliffe had been better at it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. It's possible the republicans offered a deeper pocket
Nader loves money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Most likely. R's really funded Nader and Sharpton. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. McAuliffe was successful in helping defeat Nader - instead of defeating Bush.
Way to go! :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
21. Terry MacAuliffe putting a D after his name brings shame to the Democratic Party. He's is cheap
hustler-imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DumpDavisHogg Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. McAuliffe supports misnamed "right to work" laws
Therefore, he can go screw himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC