Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Labor Dept. List 21,000 New Jobs...Congrats to the Lucky Few...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:53 AM
Original message
Labor Dept. List 21,000 New Jobs...Congrats to the Lucky Few...
:) :) :)


And the 2,000,000 who were promised jobs...........uhmmmm...uhmmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. 21000 NEW JOBS
flipping burgers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FauxNewsBlues Donating Member (420 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. No Private Sector growth
Ummm actually no. 21,000 new gubermint jobs created. The private sector actually had zero job growth. I wonder how the Chimp plans on selling this to his minions.

Perhaps he can hire 300,000 new government employees a month til November to really boost up his numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Wait! Not so fast! Don't you know those are "manufacturing" jobs?
Atleast, according to the Bushistas...

Fast-food jobs hard to qualify
Category affects possible tax break

By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
New York Times

Is cooking a hamburger patty and inserting the meat, lettuce and ketchup inside a bun a manufacturing job, like assembling automobiles?

That question is posed in the new Economic Report of the President, a thick annual compendium of observations and statistics on the health of the U.S. economy.

The latest edition, sent to Congress last week, questions whether fast-food restaurants should continue to be counted as part of the service sector or should instead be reclassified as manufacturers. No answers were offered.


http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/business/2411774

So we have to concede that Bush created 21,000 new manufacturing jobs.

Doesn't sound so awful now, does it? :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Its Friday in Lent, so you mean Filet-o-Fish, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Whoopeee!
I wasn't one of the 21,000. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Let's do the math....
There are 50 states, so that comes to 420 new jobs per state.

There are 3000+ counties, so that comes to a whopping 7 new jobs per county.

Don't you just feel the optimism?!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Revise down Dec by 8000, Jan by 15000 and have 21000 in Feb
are we gaining ANY jobs ??????

23000 decrease from previous total, add 21000 for Feb

and I do not even see one new job in 3 months!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. 150,000 people enter the job market each month so there is a net loss
of jobs. Over 2.9 million jobs have gone overseas. they are never coming back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hmm, at this rate, we'll need to have a few. . .
months where 500,000 jobs are created in order to meet the growth that Chimpco and Associates predicted right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. The reservists getting called up for duty...numbers look about right
I've been in Sales for 25 years and this is the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Echo that.
Clients starting to go belly up.

Reminiscent of the mid-late '80s, and we barely eked it past that fun time. You can only tighten the belt so much and hold your breath so long, then . . . pfffft.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. This never amazes me
and it turns out also that January's preliminary numbers were too high. Just under 100,000 new jobs were created in January.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ye gods
Could it get any worse? Our poor middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. During Clinton's term this many jobs were created every 63 hours
Every 63 hours twenty one thousand jobs were created for eight straight years. Oh those republicans really know about the economy don't they.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. You want fries with that? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
osaMABUSh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. A RW hate radio host said today that the Rate is all that counts
5.6% doesn't sound bad so, of course, they'll try to emphasis that number not the 21,000 (gov.) jobs. We all know that the unemployment is totally misleading.

I'm no business scholar but it seems to me that most hiring comes at the beginning of the year when new budgets are in place.

No matter how many jobs are created bt. now and October there's no way Bush will have a net job increase. I can see the debates now: "worst president since Hoover on the economy"

"This is a terrible number," said Sung Won Sohn, chief economist at Wells Fargo. "The economic recovery is almost three years old, and the economy should be producing 200,000 to 300,000 jobs per month."

“Americans have a clear choice in this election,” Sen. John Kerry, the presumptive Democratic nominee, told reporters Friday. “They can either suffer with more and more job losses that rip the heart out of our economy or they can give George Bush a new job.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-04 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. Ouch
The Yahoo! boards have been full of freeps boasting about the January numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC