Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California lawmakers propose lowering voting age to 14

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:03 PM
Original message
California lawmakers propose lowering voting age to 14
Millions of California's teenagers would become the nation's first to vote under a proposed constitutional amendment introduced Monday by a 71-year-old state senator.

Sen. John Vasconcellos, D-Santa Clara, proposed the idea alongside three other lawmakers, saying the Internet, cellular phones, multichannel television and a diverse society makes today's teens better informed than generations of their predecessors.

Coming on the heels of an expected record low turnout among adults in the March 2 election, Vasconcellos would give 16-year-olds a half vote and 14-year-old a quarter vote in state elections beginning in 2006.

The idea, formally called "Training Wheels for Citizenship," first requires two-thirds approval by the Legislature to appear on this November's ballot.

The California suggestion comes 33 years after the United States lowered its voting age from 21 to 18, and amid a fledgling youth movement in the U.S. and other nations to lower the voting age. Supporters say Israel allows 17-year-olds to vote in local elections, while Austria and Germany allow 16-year-olds to vote in some local elections. A bill in California letting 17-year-olds vote in primary elections when they will be 18 years old for the general election has languished.

more…
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/03/08/state1805EST0129.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Um...no thanks
I know plenty of 25 year olds who have no business voting, no need to lower the bar even more. I think 18 is just fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. 14 or FIGHT! Everybody now...14 or FIGHT!
Life imitates art...35 years later!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Nothing can change the shape of things to come!
--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is the plan to reelect Arnold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Or is it the plan to guarantee we have to use computer voting (half a vote
???)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dakota_democrat Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Poor choice...
in my opinion. At 14 most people don't know the issues enough to cast an educated vote...then again, at any age most people don't know the issues enough to cast an educated vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
60. but there are many who do
in fact those who are in HS, and taking gov't and US history classes probably know MORE about current events, policies and politics than many uninterested adults
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Snoop Dogg for Governizzle!
fushizzle dizzle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donkeyboy75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
32. ROTFLMAO
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sheer lunacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rather than lowering the voting age,
we should be requiring that people who do vote have at least a rudimentary knowledge of the candidates and issues. The
Gropernator's election tells me that many voters don't have a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsUnderstood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. My 11 year old knows better
She told me "kids today only follow what their parents want them to. . .so why should anyone be allowed to vote before they can leave the house"

Here is the reality--you can't talk about the political hot buttons in school (abortion, gay rights, corrupt government) so why in the world do we believe kids will be any better informed than their parents??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe they'll vote themselves student pay raises n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
35. And lower the drinking age n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. NO.
They are better informed about each other, NOT the world.

God, what an idiot's idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fourteen is too young, teenagers are not old enough
to make decisions as to who should run their
government. It's like getting to choose their
own parents at that age.....most would love to
trade theirs in for more permissive ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. How about a pilot program...
Allow the teenagers to vote in their local elections (community). After 10 years, we can evaluate participation and the attitudes of both the teens and the adults.

Let them learn in their own area. Then they'll be ready to join us at 18.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. OK, get ready to FLAME ME!! I don't think it could hurt...here's why
The kids I know in this age group are actually better informed that a lot of the middle-age propaganda victims I know. My experiences are, of course, different, because I am in a relatively liberal area of the country, and am involved in a liberal home schooling group.
Many 14+ would be uninformed voters, but then, guess what...so are a great many middle age propoganda victims.
Kids in this age bracket have a tendancy to get DEEPLY INVOLVED in whatever interests them (ever chatted w/ a teen about music?). If they knew that they could become involved in the world that is evolving around them, some would become deeply invoved. I am still in the market for the next RFK or MLK. What better way to have them develop that intensity at a young age. They matter - they care.
Then again, there is the fact that it would be fought tooth and nail by Repub's (especially if there is the draft possibility in 2005). Those kids will get pretty ticked off at the group that attempted to deny them something.

Digest it, then yell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
44. What about the general population?
The proposal was for ALL 14-y-o to have their "half vote" (why does that ring alarm bells? can you say "3/5ths"?) Not just the home-schooled kids you know.

"Those kids will get pretty ticked off at the group that attempted to deny them something."

Nobody is denying them anything. Some MORAN is proposing to give them something they have no right getting. So, next they get "ticked off" that they can't drink, or that at 14, they still can't drive, or get married w/o thir parents consent, or get creit cards.
Big deal, *I* get "ticked off" every day. So what? that's Life, and something your average 14-y-o has no inkling of.

what they won't try to keep Herr Gropenfuhrer in "Sak-Cra-mento"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexwcovington Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #44
53. "That's Life?"
Come now, you think more of your own problems than "That's Life."

Why is it that when young people complain it's Whining, and when adults complain it's a campaign issue?

Because young people can't vote. And that is wrong, especially in a democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cass71898 Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
47. I agree
My 10 year old has more political knowledge that most adults. He became very involved after the 2000 Selection, and even attends rallies with me. He and his friends at school had decided LAST FEBRUARY that they liked Dean.

I can also remember thinking that it wasn't fair that I could work at 16 and not vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Hi cass71898!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor Pedantic Donating Member (210 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. As a Californian....
Let me just say...you've gotta be kidding!

This is the state that got rid of our governor and put in an "actor" on a whim.

This is the state that voted for Proposition 13 ("We hate public schools"), 187 ("We hate the brown people"), and 22 ("We hate, hate, hate, homos").

The adults have proven themselves absolute idiots time and time again (give us credit for Barbara Boxer, though). The last thin we need is a huge influx of even less informed and even more immature voters.

Then again, could we really do any worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katha Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah, right
Hah! No thank you. I don't know many 18 year olds mature enough to handle voting, let alone 14 year olds.

Besides, how many 14-17 year olds are there out there really chomping at the bit to vote? Other than the underage DUers here, of course. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. I have a problem with this, but has to do with71-year-olds
or any other age groups doing onto others. Having others meet some criteria instead of merit is a problem. Its never going be fair totally anytime soon but that should be no reason for blatant discrimination against others.

I don't think it's a good idea but if you can try a teenager as adult in criminal court clearly a means test is absent in this thing they call Citizenship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LifeDuringWartime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. good point
i really wish i could vote in november... but i won't be old enough until two months afterwards :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Interesting -- and sad
If you want to gauge the depth of contempt in the country for young people, just advocate lowering the voting age.

All the arguments posted here mirror those presented before the voting age was lowered from 21 to 18.

It's sad that so many progressives have bought into it.

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Well heck, why stop at 14?
Why not lower the age to 12 ? Or 10? Or 8?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Because some of them are still wetting the bed.
After adolescence, that tends to stop......then they are drafted.



WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. Well
It's fair.

If you're old enough to be tried as an adult, you should be old enough to vote.

Oh, and drink alcohol. Right? If you're old enough to be tried as an adult, you obviously have the capacity to make informed, mature decisions about your life. Same with voting and drinking.

Oh, and driving, that's at 14, too, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crachet2004 Donating Member (725 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. Since 14 is the average mental age of most Republicans...
I say don't do it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. hmmm..
the voting age could be tied to an age that one begins paying taxes, eligibility for the draft, drinking age, and also early high school graduation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. This is a strick to give big families more votes, I think. Probably to
help latinos (catholics).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PartyPooper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. Weren't blacks given 1/2 a vote?
This seems to be the same idea.

Besides, I think kids this age are WAY to young to vote. Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
28. May as well, most Americans think like 14 year olds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlFrankenFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-04 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. Oh thank you!
Voting at 14!!! I'm 14! I'd love it!

But knowing that not everyone I know are interested in politics, kids at age 14 should be required to pass a test that judges whether or not you're "ready" to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JusticeForAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
30. LET THEM VOTE
So, why are you, adult Americans so afraid to let them vote?

Is it because you, my fellow adult Americans who are too lazy to get off your sorry asses and urge your other fellow lazy adult Americans to go vote? Worried that you'll see Representative J. Timberlake making your laws?

I think this is a wonderful way to get people involved in their elections so that they have no right to complain who their elected officials are.

Reading this, it appears that only a quarter vote is given to 14 and 15 year olds, and a half-vote is given to 16, 17, and 18 year olds. Sounds fair to me. If they want to vote, they have every right, as Americans who are created equal and who are given responsibility of being tried as adults. (This would also open them up as candidates for jury duty, as well. How can a jury of peers be fair, when none of their peers can be selected?)

Afraid your election is going to be hijacked by Snoop Doggy Dogg and Britney. Well, Damn...you should have been more of a real life activist than an e-activist here on the DU.

I paid income taxes at 14. Where was my representation?

JusticeForAll
happily, age 32.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Most minors are expected to do what their parents tell them
Wouldn't it be possible that you'd actually be giving adults with children more than one vote, rather than giving minors any votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. I think the turnout could be stronger
look at how many vote for American Idol? I think their first night was higher number of votes than all of the primary votes cast total.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
33. If children as young as 11 can be tried as adults
Then children as young as 11 should be given the right to vote.

When we try children as adults, we implicitly agree that they can make adult decisions. Currently, we want it both ways: try kids as adults, but no voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
34. I wasn't even eligible to vote for JFK
and I was 20 back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R Hickey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
37. Kids in California, back in the 1930's drove cars at 14.
My 85-year-old mother got her bum-knee in a California auto accident back then. The car she was riding in was driven by a 14 year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
38. 16
One can get a driver's license in CA at 16 why not a full vote? Perhaps an IQ test for all voters would be a good idea. Only average IQ and above can vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DiverDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. This would
disenfranchise singles, parents tell there kids to vote their way, in effect giving them more power at the polls.
I don't like it and I think even California will see that it is ridicules.
But then again, they voted in ahnald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. LOL
You think kids would do what their parents tell them?

Are you a parent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. Ha ha ha ha ha ...
> Perhaps an IQ test for all voters would be a good idea.
> Only average IQ and above can vote.

Now that would REALLY f*ck up an electoral system! :evilgrin:

Oh, I wish it would happen (in this country too) - it might be one way
to get a government to pay attention to education ...

Nihil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcwayne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
40. Better Informed? Most 14 year olds can't find their city on a map
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. Most 18 year olds can't find Iraq on a map!
Edited on Tue Mar-09-04 11:39 AM by snooper2
(Edit for link)

Remember the study that came out last year where only 13% of High School graduates could find Iraq on a map.

---
I found the study, from 2002 actually..

http://www.mrcranky.com/movies/farfromheaven/180.html

"The society survey found that only about one in seven -- 13 percent -- of Americans between the age of 18 and 24, the prime age for military warriors, could find Iraq. The score was the same for Iran, an Iraqi neighbor."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
42. Isn't this like "3/5ths of a person"?
Vasconcellos would give 16-year-olds a half vote and 14-year-old a quarter vote in state elections beginning in 2006.

So, like, 14-year-olds are only half the person 16-year-olds are, and 16-year-olds are half the person 18-year-olds are?

What kind of "fuzzy math" is this? Forget it. What the hell is this guy thinking?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. Following that logic
Right now:

14-year olds are only: EXCEPTION - Division by 0! the person 15-year olds are.
15-year olds are only: EXCEPTION - Division by 0! the person 16-year olds are.
16-year olds are only: EXCEPTION - Division by 0! the person 17-year olds are.
17-year olds are only: EXCEPTION - Division by 0! the person 18-year olds are.

Isn't some representation better than none?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexwcovington Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #49
54. I think so! Some representation is better than none.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wabbajack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
45. Quater Vote?
This is the dumbest shit I've ever heard.

Anyone see the movie "North"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JusticeForAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #45
50. I hope to hear a debate on this proposal.
1) They are too dumb. They are too uninformed. They can't find Iraq on a map. (and this makes them different from the general populace how?) (sub-topic on this: Chances are that our so-called modern day textbooks are still referring to that region as Mesopotamia and the birthplace of modern civilization...but that's another issue altogether)

2) It will disenfranchise singles and favor families with more kids (last time I checked most kids of that age were still single. Also, the same laws you vote for affect these citizens too.)

3) It's only partial representation - reminds me of 3/5. (OK, I'm not sure which side these people stand on, and don't really care, some representation is better than none.)

4) They will do what their parents tell them. (Sorry I can't even respond to this one...I am laughing too hard.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wabbajack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Some will
vote like their parents tell them. Think of fundie familes with 8 kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
52. No thanks. This way, all of the young, "culture" crazy kids will vote....
for the Gropenator in 2006. Yes, the adults did it, they may regret it but the kids will be to impressionable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alexwcovington Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. Impressions go both ways.
BELIEVE IT OR NOT!
*Young people can think for themselves!
*Young people are regularly TRIED AS ADULTS while not receiving any of their rights!
*Young people pay taxes, and have NO REPRESENTATION on how they are spent!
*Young people today are the most politically active and volunteer-oriented generation in recent memory!
*Young people are ready and willing to vote!


Are you ready to accept the facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Castilleja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
56. One of the dumbest ideas I can think of.
Short of letting them drive at that age. There is something to be said for maturity when deciding matters that involve other people as well as yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
57. California republicans propose embryonic sufferage.

It's only the logical extension
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JusticeForAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
58. You sound like hetero Repubs discussing gay marriage

Rights for us, none for you, though. We say so, we are the majority.

Your arguments against this legislation are about as well-supported as those currently heard in the gay marriage debate.

It's so nice to visit the liberal hotbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
59. Good
I would have been a better voter and citizen at the age of 8 than many "adults" who currently vote.

Go California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JusticeForAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC