Gay Marriage Fails (NYS Senate), 24-38

[brooklynite]

Source: NY Daily News

After an historic debate that lasted close to three hours, the Senate today rejected a bill that would have made New York the sixth state in the nation to legalize same-sex marriage.

The final vote was 24-38. Seven Democrats voted "no", while not a single Republican voted "yes."


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2009/12/gay-marriage-fails-24-38.html

[Behind the Aegis]

1. Disgusting!

:puke:

[HERVEPA]

2. Just want to express my disgust

at this vote to all the GLBT folks out there.
People just suck!

[David Zephyr]

11. What's that sound? GayTM's shutting down for the Democratic Party across the nation.

Enough is enough.

[Pab Sungenis]

3. Boycott New York State.

All we need to do is get a million gays to pull up stakes and move to Wyoming. Make it the first majority-gay state. Then watch them squirm as we ban straight marriage.

[tomm2thumbs]

8. interesting thought - for the sake of moving the argument to conclusion

the eventual conclusion that it will change, just the conservative oldies kicking and screaming on the way to their bath

[galledgoblin]

9. nah, just into the city of Buffalo and other districts where

the Senators voted appropriately.

[LynneSin]

12. I wouldn't boycott the entire state

I'm sure those from NYC were supportive.

[brooklynite]

28. Diaz, Monseratte and Kruger are all from NYC

[LynneSin]

64. well there goes that theory

:cry:

[Freddie Stubbs]

16. Yeah, but who wants to live in Montana?

:shrug:

[pettypace]

23. what about bi's?

do you strictly have to be 100 percent gay?

What if you have gay parents, can you be grandfathered in?

[Pab Sungenis]

25. Bi's count.

The "gay friendly" and "straight allies" do not count. Today underlines the fact that we can't trust heterosexual "allies" to watch out for our rights.

[clear eye]

63. Hey! I'm straight and I called my senator to vote yea.

Fortunately she did. Yesterday's defeat doesn't show how every single straight person stood or what they did.

I do enjoy your fantasy of reversing the power equation w/ a practically gay-only state. Clearly even sympathetic straight people would defeat the purpose.

[Le Taz Hot]

73. You know what?

That's really unfair! Lots of us here in CA are working VERY hard to overturn Prop. H8. Just as the Civil Rights movement had LOTS of caring, involved activist Caucasians, so does the Civil Rights struggle for the GBLT community have lots of support from the straight community. Know your enemy, but more importantly, KNOW YOUR FRIENDS!

Peace,

LTH

[goclark]

4. Horrible! nt

[galledgoblin]

5. roll call, take note.

http://blog.timesunion.com/capitol/archives/20479/gay-marriage-vote-tally/#more-20479
With the vote to begin shortly, we’ll update the list below:

YES: 24
NO: 38

FULL ROLL CALL

* Eric Adams (D) — YES “This is about love.”
* Joseph Addabbo (D) — NO
* Darrel Aubertine (D) — NO
* Neil Breslin (D) — YES
* Ruben Diaz (D) — NO “Sen. Smith, it is better to keep your word.”
* Martin Malave Dilan (D) — YES
* Tom Duane (D) — YES
* Pedro Espada (D) — YES
* Brian Foley (D) — YES
* Ruth Hassell-Thompson (D) — YES
* Shirley Huntley (D) — NO
* Craig Johnson (D) — YES
* Jeffrey Klein (D) — YES
* Liz Krueger (D) — YES
* Carl Kruger (D) — NO
* Hiram Monserrate (D) — NO
* Velmanette Montgomery (D) — YES
* George Onorato (D) — NO
* Suzi Oppenheimer (D) — YES
* Kevin Parker (D) — YES
* Bill Perkins (D) — YES
* John Sampson (D) — YES
* Diane Savino (D) — YES
* Eric Schneiderman (D) — YES
* Jose Serrano (D) — YES
* Malcolm Smith (D) — YES
* Daniel Squadron (D) — YES
* William Stachowski (D) — NO
* Toby Ann Stavisky (D) — YES
* Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D) — YES
* Antoine Thompson (D) — YES
* David Valesky (D) — YES

and of course, every republican as one bloc:

* James Alesi (R) — NO
* John Bonacic (R) — NO
* John DeFrancisco (R) — NO
* Hugh Farley (R) — NO
* John Flanagan (R) — NO
* Charles Fuschillo, Jr. (R) — NO
* Martin Golden (R) — NO
* Joseph Griffo (R) — NO
* Kemp Hannon (R) — NO
* Owen Johnson (R) — NO
* Andrew Lanza (R) — NO
* Bill Larkin (R) — NO
* Kenneth LaValle (R) — NO
* Vincent Leibell (R) — NO
* Tom Libous (R) — NO
* Elizabeth Little (R) — NO
* Carl Marcellino (R) — NO
* George Maziarz (R) — NO
* Roy McDonald (R) — NO
* Thomas Morahan (R) — NO
* Michael Nozzolio (R) — NO
* Frank Padavan (R) — NO
* Michael Ranzenhofer (R) — NO
* Joseph Robach (R) — NO
* Stephen Saland (R) — NO
* James Seward (R) — NO
* Dean Skelos (R) — NO
* Dale Volker (R) — NO
* George Winner (R) — NO
* Catherine Young (R) — NO

[hedgehog]

20. I will be sending Senator Aubertine a note with NO money!

[Libertas1776]

22. That piece of shit

wife beating coup organizer Hiram Monseratte voted NO. Why isn't that fucking piece of trash in jail right now?!!!!! The government in Albany is such a fucking joke.

[KamaAina]

36. And the spouse abuser votes No

in order to uphold the sanctity of traditional marriage. :sarcasm:

[DuaneBidoux]

6. We have to face it, without courts it won't happen anytime soon.

Alfred Kuhn wrote a book about scientific revolutions. In his research he discovered than even supposed rational scientists pretty much had to die out before the new paradigm became embedded in science. If it is this way with rational and thoughtful scientists imagine what we are facing with average people, let alone wingnuts.

Unless we have courts come down on our side consistently it will be a slow slog. Without courts the vote would have eventually arrived for women, but more slowly. Eventually racial equality would have arrived, but again, much more slowly.

Know this however--equality in marriage will eventually arrive. Slowly without the help of courts, or more quickly with the help of the courts. But as far as changing minds? That is rare. It usually requires the death of the old, and the ascendancy of the young.

[paulsby]

7. rational and thoughtful scientists

lol. don't even get me started. science is rational. scientists are just as prone to human foibles as anyone else.

this NYS ruling is both surprising to me, and depressing.

[DuaneBidoux]

65. Well, that was a bit my point: they are rational and they are thoughtful.

But of course this is a relative concept. The mind of a scientist is more disciplined and rational than an average person--but that is not necessarily saying a lot.

[targetpractice]

14. Did you read "Born to Rebel" by Frank Sulloway?

Also about leaders of revolutions in science and the correlation with birth order... the gist is that all (almost all) revolutions in science were lead by latter borns... First born scientists tend to support the status quo... Sulloway has since done much research about the natural origins of conservative and liberal thinking.

Upon googling... I think you meant Thomas Kuhn, who wrote "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions"... Thanks for the tip... I look forward to reading.

[DuaneBidoux]

66. Thanks for the name correction. I read it 22 years ago and only remembered the big lesson:

Old guys like me have to die. Rather depressing, from my perspective.

[alcibiades_mystery]

26. It was Thomas Kuhn

:-)

[Unvanguard]

60. It won't take courts. It will take time.

Courts generally follow public opinion anyway.

[Beavker]

10. As a whole...

This country just isn't going anywhere...we just can't change for the better and will be the last reasonably industrialized country to make strides in basically any aspect (environment, healthcare, rights).

I don't have much hope that by the time my 18mo. old is an old man, he'll be able to see positive change on ANYTHING in this country, let alone me. Two steps forward, three steps back.

[Soylent Brice]

13. ...

:argh:

[Zoeisright]

15. What is the matter with them?

Are they Democrats, or not?

[Freddie Stubbs]

18. There are a significant number of Democrats who do not support marriage equity. Such as this guy:

[alcibiades_mystery]

27. You mean

"That one."

[Freddie Stubbs]

43. Your words. Not mine.

What would Freud say about that?

[alcibiades_mystery]

45. Uh huh

[Freddie Stubbs]

58. Indeed

[CTLawGuy]

31. Obama is responsible for the NY Senate now

unbelievable.

[Danmel]

35. How do you figure?

Gillibrand is in the US Senate and she is pro gay rights.

This was the NY State senate. (They still suck, but it isn't Obama's fault)

[CTLawGuy]

37. I don't figure

but the person above me brought Obama into this.

[Freddie Stubbs]

42. No, but he is emblematic of Democratic politicians who are trying to

straddle the fence on this issue. They want the support of those who want gay rights, but they also do not want to alienate voters with 'traditional' values. So they take a stance that is to the left of Republicans but which still falls short of what marriage equity proponents want. It may not be right, but is sure seems to work in getting elected.

[xchrom]

41. indeed -- he did say he would

use the 'bully-pulpit' on our behalf.

how much did he use it in ny?

[Freddie Stubbs]

44. He also said that he was opposed to same sex marriage because

his "religious beliefs say that marriage is something sanctified between a man and a woman."

http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/lesbianactivism/p/BarackObama.htm

[xchrom]

46. oh yes indeed he did say that. nt

[TheWatcher]

71. Translation.

"I'm A Bigot, but too much of a coward to admit it, so I will hide behind religion to cover the ass of my Bigotry."

Change We Can Be Ashamed Of.

[Zhade]

48. We're quite aware he and others are bigoted on this issue. Not news.

NT!

[boppers]

50. Lincoln didn't believe blacks and whites were equals.

This equality thing is a long slog, taking many hundreds of years, and expecting it to be fixed quickly is a bit... odd.

[slackmaster]

30. They are career politicians FIRST, Democrats SECOND, liberal somewhere lower on the scale

Their primary concern, getting re-elected, usually eclipses all other considerations.

[galledgoblin]

32. well, several of them just lost votes, more than they may have gambled they would.

I will not vote for Stachowski, D from Erie County, when the next election comes around.

[leftynyc]

17. My sincere apologies

This New Yorker is utterly ashamed of this vote. In my head, I'm swearing like a sailor.

[Dogtown]

19. K&R, sadly n/t

[hedgehog]

21. Ahem, "nine of the Senate’s 11 black members voted in support of same-sex marriage."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/nyregion/03marriage.html

[galledgoblin]

33. Ruth Hassell-Thompson's speech made me teary

I'm a little teary just thinking about it.

[redwitch]

24. What the hell is wrong with this country?

You would think NY would have better sense and lots more empathy for fellow humans. The fight goes on brothers and sisters. We will get there but it will be gawdawful slow I guess.

[CTLawGuy]

29. That sucks

if you want to come over to CT, we have equal marriage and an annoying senator who needs voting out in 2012. His name rhymes with Shmeeberman.

[superconnected]

34. I know that guy! He plays a dem on tv right?

[CTLawGuy]

38. yeah

but he's not a good actor.

[Historic NY]

39. What happened to all the talk they had the votes? ...

Albany once again lives up to its dysfunctional leadership.

[2Design]

40. constitution is dead - equality is dead n/t

[BobTheSubgenius]

47. One of the bluest states, huh?

:puke:

[defendandprotect]

49. What is their problem? I don't get it --

[and-justice-for-all]

51. New York State Senate Votes Down Gay Marriage Bill

Source: NY Times

December 3, 2009
New York State Senate Votes Down Gay Marriage Bill
By JEREMY W. PETERS NY Times

ALBANY — The State Senate defeated a bill on Wednesday that would legalize same-sex marriage, after an emotional debate that touched on civil rights, family and history. The vote means that the bill, pushed by Gov. David A. Paterson, is effectively dead for the year and dashes the optimism of gay rights advocates, who have had setbacks recently in several key states.

The bill was defeated by a decisive margin of 38 to 24. The Democrats, who have a bare, one-seat majority, did not have enough votes to pass the bill without some Republican support, but not a single Republican senator voted for the measure. Still, several key Democrats who were considered swing votes also opposed the bill.

Mr. Paterson made an unusual trip to the Senate floor minutes after the last vote was cast, saying, “These victories come and so do the losses, but you keep on trying.”

The state’s Roman Catholic bishops, who had actively lobbied against the bill, said they were pleased by the vote.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/03/nyregion/03marriage.html?_r=1

---

Fucking deplorable.

The vote in the Senate was 38-24, with not one Republican voting for the bill. The Democrats voting against marriage equality were Addabbo, Aubertine, Huntley, C. Kruger, Monserrate, Onorato, and Stachowski.

[enigmatic]

52. sickening

:puke:

[clear eye]

53. Noooo.

I don't know. Even as I was writing how weak the Dem majority is, and who the anti constituency is, I was picturing our state as being the fourth state to go for equality. I can't even say I could have done more; my senator voted yea.

[and-justice-for-all]

54. Send them a nasty letter...

I live in Indiana and I just sent Addabbo an email.

[JDPriestly]

55. So sad. But it is just a matter of time.

Young people could care less.

[Le Taz Hot]

74. And yet . . .

I keep reading on this board, in this thread even, that if we (Boomers) would just hurry up and die off everything will be all better. :eyes: My only hope is that the youngbloods will get a clue and understand that NOTHING gets done without activism and each generations' activism builds on the previous generations' efforts.

[defendandprotect]

56. Strange, sick and sad . . .

[No Elephants]

57. Another victory for hate, irrationality and pandering to the religious far right.

:puke:

[Tim01]

59. I think it's the team thing again.

Humans just love to pick teams, then hate every team other than their own. We see it all over the world.
The problem the gays have is a lack of population. Their team isn't big enough to not get picked on by the other team.
This problem may be here for a very long time.

[apnu]

62. Good point

To overcome this problem, the culture must change. To change the culture, opinions of homosexuality have to change. This is akin to asking Americans to live in a color-less world or a sex-less world.

Equality will never come to America until our culture of different-ness is removed. I have never understood why the civil rights, feminist and gay movements have not worked together very well. If those three groups teamed up under the banner of equality, real change can come to America.

[beyond cynical]

61. ...thereby agreeing with Barack Obama’s position on gay marriage.

[La Lioness Priyanka]

67. the most rabidly homophobic senator Ruben diaz used Obama's stance as his excuse

[leliorisen]

68. Resource material on the 8 Democratic traitors

I have been putting in quite a bit of time in targeting the state senators that think gays in New York are 2nd class citizens.

I have done 3 blogposts so far, including contact information, voting records, and other relevant source information that will be helpful when it comes time to challenge them in primaries. Every one of them must be challenged. I am sharing this issue here, because it is a waste of resources to have the info and not have it available to the activists that will...hopefully...use it.

For the 3 I have already targeted (I am doing them in alphabetical order), here are the links. Please share with fellow activists:

Shirley Huntley
http://leliorisen.blogspot.com/2009/12/traitor-3-shirley-huntley.html

Darrel Aubertine
http://leliorisen.blogspot.com/2009/12/traitor-2-darrel-aubertine.html

Joe Addabbo
http://leliorisen.blogspot.com/2009/12/lets-start-with-addabbo.html

I will be posting on the other 5 in coming days. Additionally, if you have any relevant information to include, please e-mail me and I will include the information as I verify it.

You can e-mail me at
[e-mail]

[brooklynite]

69. A waste of time unless...

..you find solid candidates to run against them ASAP. It's possible (I got a pro-choice reformer elected two years ago in place of an "old school" Democrat) but time is running short.

[leliorisen]

75. I guess now we see if our advocacy money is well spent

If the glbt advocacy groups do not try and find a candidate to run against these people, then we will know the extent of their impotency. At least make the effort.

There are certain seats we cannot win with a progressive Democratic candidate (Aubertine's, for example). However, in the NY 23d Congressional race, the Republican who dropped out of the race was far superior on social issues to the Democrat (that won over the Conservative candidate that forced Dede Scozzafava out).

I will take a progressive Republican (as few as there are) over a Rahm Emanuel, Blue Cruss Democrat, anytime.

I was a lifelong Democrat...now voting solely as an Independent progressive.

[Socal31]

70. Sad.

Why do people care who is screwing who behind closed doors?


Oh, I forgot, you might catch the ghey from a toilet seat!*





*extreme sarcasm

[Le Taz Hot]

72. New Yorkers can now join us Californians

in the Bigotry Hall of Shame. :cry: