|
Women MAY by the line that he could not help himself when it came to the woman he raped, most men will not. Most men have an "instinct" (It may be cultural, it may be how most men are raised, it may be truly instinctive, I do not know thus the parenthesis) to protect women, and if they can not they will punish any man who harms a woman. This has been the case for Millennium.
Now as to the harassment on the street, that is a different story. In rural societies men and women had their places, but these were NOT absolute sex based roles (Men gathered and hunted and women gathered and hunted for example, not men hunted and women gathered in hunting gathering societies for example). When Urban centers developed these were locations where the head of surrounding rural area made his capital. Most were easy for the surrounding rural population to get to (and this was true in herding societies as while as Farming societies). When people were in rural areas the sex roles were know and followed but not strictly. In Urban areas, being the center of POWER, every one was on their best behavior (or worse behavior if you went to the wrong parts of town). In such locations it became more and more important for both sexes to followed what they assumed to be the role they sex was to play.
Thus in urban areas sex roles became more fixed (A similar situation arouse in the old south during Segregation, both races had their "place" in society, but these were NOT rigidly enforced. For example when farm work was being done, the workers tend to sit at one table and eat the same food. The whites on one end, the Blacks on the other. Segregated but both sides getting the same food. This was do to the fact the person who hired the workers needed to make sure they were ALL feed, laws that said the two races had to eat at different tables was ignored. The problem was in URBAN area the laws were rigidly enforced, because it was part of the power structure. Whites and Blacks would travel together into the urban centers, but as soon as they entered the town, they each went to those areas allocated to them. Thus it was the towns and cities where you saw the most segregation of the Races in the old South NOT the rural areas. The same thing happens in the Arab World today, the strictest rules are applied in Urban Areas, while the rural areas follow the same rules, but modify them as needed (which is most of the time).
One of the problem with the Arab World is that it is only since the 1950s that most Arabs live in Urban areas, prior to 1950 most Arabs lived in Rural Areas. Thus only in the last 50 or so years has the "Norm" been for most areas to live in Urban Areas (For comparison the first US Census when more people lived in Urban Areas as opposed to Rural Areas in the US was 1920, thus some time about the time of WWI the population or Urban America exceeded Rural America, Europe did this about 40 years before, if you exclude Russia and Eastern Europe for the definition of Europe).
One of the changes that occurs when a Society stops being predominate rural, is that the Urban Areas are no longer the center of a much larger society, but becomes the main body itself with the Rural Areas becoming boondocks (Important in the sense that is where food comes from, but much less important as to getting elected or staying in power). Thus rural life follow and is lead by urban life instead of urban leading rural life, but rural life being dominate. This change meant the loose rules do to the need of rural society starts to be looked at violation of sex roles NOT needed variations (This can be seen in the US in the 1930s-1950s, as the US became more and more Urban, women lost rights, Women were becoming Doctors, Lawyers and other professionals in the later 1800s early 1900s, but that all closed down starting in the 1920s). Rural Rules permitted such exceptions to Sex roles, exceptions needed and thus done, Urban area rejected the concept that such exceptions are needed.
In the 1970s women revolted against the reduction of their role in US Society, but more do to the need to earn more money for the family given the inflation of the time period and the overall decline in the wages of men (I.e. Men COULD afford to keep an unemployed woman at home in the 1950s, but that was no longer the case in the 1970s). Many men resented the fact that women were brought in TO KEEP THEIR SALARIES DOWN OR EVEN TO WORK AT REDUCE WAGES. By the 1980s this initial resistance was gone (Discrimination still existed but women were accepted into the work force). The reason for this acceptance was that most men's salary HAD not kept up and their wives needed to work to keep up the standard of living their parents had enjoyed on their father's wages alone.
The Arabs appear to be in the situation the US was in in the 1970s, women are entering the work force to help out their family's income, but one of the results of such women in the work force is to keep men's wages down. At that reduction of wages the men will attack who they perceive as the cause, thus the attack on women in the 1970s in the US and today in the Arab world.
This is further fostered by the Government for it provides an outlet to those men whose income has dropped NOT do to women entering the work force, but the Government Policy of keeping wages low (Which has to do with excessive theft of Government Resources by the people in power then anything else). What is needed is a better distribution of Income, but to do so would require the rich giving up some of their wealth. The Rich oppose this and that means the people who rules these dictatorships. Given the dilemma the Government thus encourage attacks on woman for that directs the anger of the population onto a "Safe" enemy (Egypt can not afford to blame the US, Egypt is the second largest recipient of US Foreign aid) nor the Jews (Most Jews left the Arab Countries in the 1940s and 1950s thus any anti-jewish movement quickly becomes an Anti-US Movement and the Arabs do NOT want that). The real enemy is the Government itself, but the Government does NOT want any attacks on itself. The religious right views the Government as the enemy more then women, thus can not be encouraged so that leaves attacks on women and any other minority group the Government can blame the economic decline on (Communists would be a good enemy, but given the fall of the Soviet Union not a viable group to put the blame on).
Blaming women, using the Koran, is a good place to start (Most of these Countries are Sunni Moslem NOT Shiite Muslim meaning that the religious leaders are picked by the Government NOT an independent religious structure). Using Islam the Government does two things, gives an outlet to its own population that divides any opposition (I.e. the Religious Right from the women of the Society) AND provides the a group the Government can blame the attack on women on (i.e. "it is NOT the fault of the Government, but those religious extremist, even through the religious leaders pushing this are all on the Government's payroll).
|